Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Tatjana of Liechtenstein

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Malcolmxl5 (talk | contribs) at 17:30, 29 July 2020 (→‎Princess Tatjana of Liechtenstein: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:30, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Tatjana of Liechtenstein[edit]

Princess Tatjana of Liechtenstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tatjana is the youngest child of the sovereign prince of a microstate. She has no succession rights whatsoever and no constitutional or public role. The official website of the family mentions her only twice and reports no activities of hers, while her eldest brother is mentioned 64 times. The subject appears to be an entirely private person. And while her ancestry is almost as impressive as the size of her brood, I do not see significant coverage in reliable sources. Surtsicna (talk) 14:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 14:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 14:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The dearth of sources mentioning her even though she is 47 means she does not meet WP:GNG at this time. MarnetteD|Talk 22:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and the other comments above. Smeat75 (talk) 19:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete being in the royal family of a micro-nation is not a default sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:18, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.