Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alain Baudet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alain Baudet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is currently sourced to some YouTube videos featuring the subject, and a commercial website selling a book published by an organisation he worked for. I've looked online for better sourcing, but am not finding anything better. The name Alain Baudet seems to be quite common, so it's possible that I'm missing some stuff about this person amongst all the obituaries and random websites about other people called Alain Baudet, but I don't think he passes WP:GNG. GirthSummit _(blether) 08:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 08:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 08:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, would have recommended a "redirect/selective merge" to the relevent section at Qigong but unfortunately that article does not have one about practitioners. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:51, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My search found none of the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:BASIC. Youtube videos and pinterest shots do not make someone notable. He doesn't appear to meet any martial arts notability criteria and I didn't find him on the French WP. There's simply no evidence of him being WP notable. Papaursa (talk) 13:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer: I believe the relist above was unnecessary per WP:NOQUORUM. If considering an NAC of this discussion, please bear WP:RELISTBIAS in mind. GirthSummit _(blether) 17:33, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article lacking any reliable 3rd party sourcing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.