Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruf R Kompressor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by King of Hearts (talk | contribs) at 03:25, 2 August 2020 (→‎Ruf R Kompressor: Closed as no consensus (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (WP:NPASR). King of ♥ 03:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ruf R Kompressor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A poorly written article which does less to cover it's subject matter in detail. It is better off as a section in the Ruf automobile main page. U1 quattro TALK 09:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think with a little more info and some formatting I can clean this one up just fine, i'll get on it after I finish improving the RK Coupe article. TKOIII (talk) 00:12, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think that would be really helpful. This article also needs an infobox and some more citations to bring it up to par. In its current state, it does not look like a proper article.U1 quattro TALK 04:51, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. U1 quattro TALK 09:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 21:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 23:39, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I added another source, an infobox and more info to the article so I think it's pretty much up to par at this point. TKOIII (talk) 19:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.