Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Flanders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Flanders

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Set up two groups (both currently at AfD for lack of notability). Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 07:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, article was presumably created by a COI editor, this guy does not meet GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable and unknown person. The reference is at the wrong place. Even the writer itself with "close connections" can write only a single sentence. Styyx (talk) 09:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:54, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:54, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Festival for Cinema of the Deaf and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago Institute for the Moving Image --Closeapple (talk) 19:47, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable --Devokewater @ 10:27, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.