Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Liddell-Grainger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Liddell-Grainger[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article looks like a mere genealogical entry, being mostly about to whom she is related (see WP:NOTGENEALOGY policy). There is talk of a missionary and charity work but it is sourced to a single article that was apparently published by The Daily Mirror, therefore being tabloid journalism. Looking it up further online has not produced any noteworthy results, so I doubt there is significant coverage to establish notability per WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. Surtsicna (talk) 10:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 10:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 10:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 10:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the Liddell-Grainger's are British aristocrats however there is nothing else to suggest notability, fails WP:GNG --Devokewater@ 14:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and the other comment above.Smeat75 (talk) 01:08, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is nothing more than a genealogical record. The topic fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. There are no reliable sources independent of the subject that cover anything directly and indepth about this individual because they have done absolutely nothing notable. Being related to a public figure is not notable WP:INVALIDBIO WP:NOTINHERITED. Wikipedia is WP:NOTGENEALOGY of non-notable members in royal families. // Timothy :: talk 05:42, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.