User talk:Cabayi

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Roqui15

3X

And Roqui's prize is a free upgrade to a WP:3X ban. Cabayi (talk) 14:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Seeing as you're at least somewhat familiar with this case from previous reports, would you care to take a look at the latest report over at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Roqui15? TompaDompa (talk) 12:23, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. They admitted to both WP:SOCKPUPPETRY and WP:MEATPUPPETRY after you declined their edit request (diff). TompaDompa (talk) 17:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why you came here TompaDompa? Are you afraid of being blocked? I know why you came here, because you know that what you are you doing is not allowed, you are clearly violating the "you don't own wikipedia" rule. You should be blocked forever my friend. Too bad no one will probably do it. BestaMontalegre (talk) 18:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Double reporting

Sir, regarding this. I was not reporting twice, but something technical happened, likely because of twinkle. In articles, sometimes the thing freezes, and when it completes, I get edit conflict because of two edits back to back. That's why I keep it disabled and enable it only when reporting. I hope you understand. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fylindfotberserk, it's comforting to know that I'm not the only one to get tripped up by the tools. Happy editing. Cabayi (talk) 17:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not to waste your time sir. But I'd like to share that before my break of 4-months I used to open 40-pages at a time and work on them simultaneously without any problem. Now, opening 10 pages causes breakdowns. I keep twinkle disabled, but the speed is nowhere near the original. Do I have to report it somewhere? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All I can suggest is the standard stuff...

Is it the browser? Have you tried another, Firefox, Edge, Safari, Opera?
Is it the size of internet cache? Have you cleared the temporary files lately?
Is your disk getting full?
If you're on Win 10, is there an upgrade pending that needs a reboot?

Sorry I've not got any better ideas, Cabayi (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've to check another browser. Rest of the things are taken care off and I use Win 8.1. Now I use Chrome exclusively, because for some reason I can't login into IE, which previously was my main browser for Wikipedia (Chrome used only for reFill tool). Thanks sir, thanks for the time and suggestions. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:50, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fylindfotberserk, I'm on Win 10 and mostly using Firefox but for the last couple of weeks Edge has been pushing itself quite aggressively - starting Edge automatically, importing add-ons from Firefox, offering itself as a new default browser, and generally butting in where it's not wanted. It might be related. Cabayi (talk) 20:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Might be. It came as part of an update package for 8.1 in June I believe. I uninstalled it because of similar problems. I'd give Firefox a try. Had good experience with it many years back through. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revised Draft Upload Question

Hello,

I have reviewed your comments regarding copyright on this submission. I have made several edits including removing and rewriting any copyrighted material and removing the copyrighted pictures you mentioned here. I also made sure the article linked to verified third party sources.

The message on the drafted page says that I should contact you before uploading again. Could you please tell me the next steps for uploading my draft?

Thank you!

JessMessenger (talk) 19:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JessMessenger,

Ensure your draft meets the requirements of WP:NORG.
Don't deceive yourself - its parent organisation ISSA doesn't have an article - why is GBAC more notable than its parent?
On a personal level I'm unwilling to do for free the work you're being paid for. Other editors may be more accommodating.
Draft:Global Biorisk Advisory Council is the place to do it, add the following at the top of the page:

{{subst:AFC draft|JessMessenger}}

-- Cabayi (talk) 07:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello Cabayi, thank you for being so fast (deleting drafts eligible for G11). Well I made a request at WT: AFCP and it has been almost a week since no one has ever attended those requests. I have been patrolling the AFC drafts and I have found a lot of drafts which should be declined on sight because they are against Wikipedia’s purpose I.e pure advertising. I am therefore requesting if you could add my name to the AFC list so that I may be able to have access to the script. Best regards Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 13:20, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sidowpknbkhihj

After this IP came up to me about new socks from Sidowpknbkhihj, i started a new SPI against Sidowpknbkhihj today. I also started a new global lock request against them here. Since you are familiar with the case, could you please check this case out?. Thank you, SMB9 9thx my edits 10:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, these socks got blocked. SMB9 9thx my edits 06:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question before upload draft again

Hello, Cabayi

I revised draft for 'KDI Central Library' in my sandbox. I did remove and rewrite any copyrighted materials. I show that the message on the drafted page says that I should contact you before uploading again. Can you tell me please what to do next steps for uploading my draft?

Thank you.

Thehinse (talk) 14:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thehinse, the history section still looks like a copy of https://library.kdischool.ac.kr/htmlmanager/service/15 which will need to be removed and those revisions removed from the page's history. -- Cabayi (talk) 17:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi, i revised history section that you said. Thehinse (talk) 01:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thehinse, I've removed the copyright material from the page's history, added the necessary declarations of your paid editing and moved it to Draft:KDI Central Library. You can submit it for review whenever you wish. Cabayi (talk) 07:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revocation

Hello Cabayi, hope you are well. Could you possibly revoke TPA for I hate Guarantors (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)? Thanks in advance. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In line with Favonian's treatment of I hate estate agents (no more guarantors) wheels (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log),

Done, though I'm unaware of the LTA involved. Cabayi (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, it is WP:LTA/BMX. Appreciate your help! -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goofdawg

Did they really abuse the email function that you have revoked it? The block modification goes from 1 block parameter to 3 block parameters in 1 go. --94.73.33.144 (talk) 20:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The intent is to prevent Goofdawg (talk · contribs) making personal attacks, not to slightly restrict their means of making them. Cabayi (talk) 08:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Email abuse from this user; yes or no? This is all I am asking. I am concerned that they could have lost privelege without either without evidence or abuse. --94.73.33.144 (talk) 08:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The editor who was attacked did not (so far as I'm aware) complain of any. Cabayi (talk) 08:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why haven't you said a thing regarding email access revocation when you have revoked this privelege for this user? --94.73.33.144 (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I refer you to my first answer. Cabayi (talk) 18:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And if they blocked from this option without evidence of abuse, how about they get it back. --94.73.33.144 (talk) 18:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I refer you to my first answer. Cabayi (talk) 18:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why? I don't why is the first answer and nothing else. --94.73.33.144 (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

What is the meaning of your username? A question in my somewhat interest. --94.73.33.144 (talk) 18:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]