User talk:Ganbaruby
Welcome to Ganbaruby's talk page! Hit the "New section" button on the top right to start a new conversation. I will always reply with the {{ping}} template on this page as well so you don't have to watchlist this page. {{ping}} doesn't work for IP addresses, in which I'll leave a {{talkback}} on your user page. |
|
||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Hi (archive)
Your talk page button says say hi! so I'm saying hi. Hi LieLower (talk) 09:52, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Sorry Myquiky12 (talk) 15:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Rosguill. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Wenchang Subdistrict (disambiguation), and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
signed, Rosguill talk 15:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- My mistake, for some reason the redirect showed up in the queue despite you having reviewed it and I clicked on the button before seeing that it had the wrong prompt. signed, Rosguill talk 15:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Rosguill: No worries, thanks for your hard work. Quick question: if I come across an unreviewed redirect, should I just mark it as reviewed? I've noticed that New Pages Feed doesn't mark it as reviewed either. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 04:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ganbaruby, I'm not sure I understand the question. Reviewing redirects is part of NPP as well, although it's generally much simpler. Best practices are collected here. signed, Rosguill talk 04:16, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Rosguill: No worries, thanks for your hard work. Quick question: if I come across an unreviewed redirect, should I just mark it as reviewed? I've noticed that New Pages Feed doesn't mark it as reviewed either. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 04:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Arnprior Packers
Out of respect, please return the content I have added. Citations probably won't work well because of the time period and infancy of the Internet at the time. This was created by me about me and I am a former Arnprior Packer - but their stats and data and own website doesn't go back that far. I added this bc I thought it would be cool to have former players add something about their hockey life after the Packers.
Please replace the content.
Chris Lane — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1970:55E1:2300:602F:CEDF:757A:8888 (talk) 04:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- No. Everything on Wikipedia must be attributed to reliable sources. If a source does not exist, we have no way of verifying the authenticity of the information, and therefore should not be added. Also, writing autobiographies, even if in a section, is considered a conflict of interest and is strongly discouraged. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 04:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Conflict of interest, for whom? "Discouraged" does not mean it can be there. Really too bad and disappointing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1970:55E1:2300:602F:CEDF:757A:8888 (talk) 04:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
There is no need for further correspondence on this issue as I do not want to justify/support your employment related to this any further.
On Wikipedia page of FunPlus
Hi Ganbaruby,
Nice to e-meet you in a weird situation. I'm Gabriel Liu, the Game & Esports Analyst of FunPlus. I’ve noticed that one of our colleagues made some changes under the FunPlus page, and it was be seen as "spamming"/"promoting". I understand that and would upload a more proper version with references and citations.
However, according to our status quo, we do need to make some fundamental changes to the FunPlus page. And it would be complicated for us to give out references and/or citations. For example, now FunPlus's HQ is officially in Singapore, and since we don't have any press releases on it, we cannot change the HQ part on the wiki. The same thing happens to the game product sessions, Family Farm is no longer our game, we also cannot give out proof unless we disclose the confidential documents - which is also not very possible from my perspective. Due to our neglect, there are many more issues on the page.
I'm writing to ask if it's possible for you and the whole Wikipedia community, to help us review the version we provide - then upload it? We want to make the page more relevant to our situation as quickly as possible and to avoid potential losses due to misinformation.
Thanks,
All the best,
Gabriel Liu — Preceding unsigned comment added by GabrielYXLiu (talk • contribs) 09:14, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @GabrielYXLiu: Thanks for reaching out for clarification. You should first familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline, most importantly that you are strongly advised to not edit FunPlus directly. You may instead file edit requests on the article's talk page for any improvments you want to implement. Also understand that everything listed in an article must be verifiable, which means information should be attributed to reliable sources independent of the company. You could probably get away with citing your own website for basic information that is not unduly self-serving (eg. based in Singapore), but do not cite your website or PR releases for anything else. If it doesn't have a source, it shouldn't be listed on the page. Lastly, be aware of copyright violations since your colleague's text seems to closely resemble the text on your website. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 15:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi
because its rude not to Shift674 (talk) 00:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Oh no I forgot to sign my name. Shift674 (talk) 00:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Shift674
Hi
Thanks for the nice welcome message and looking at my proposed edit on the China article! It's my first time so still getting the hang of it. I happened to land on the China page and was reading the general overview and thought what that person added seemed so politically charged and out of place, so I decided to make an account and give it a shot. Thanks again!
Mangomystery (talk) 04:51, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Mangomystery: No worries, your feedback is greatly appreciated! Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, especially regarding due weight, is pretty subjective and hard to get right, so there's always the possibility that others will disagree. If you have any other questions, feel free to drop by the Teahouse, where we have a space for newcomers to ask questions about editing. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 04:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Hina Khan
Hi could you please add the guest appearances table in Hina Khan as she was a part of them. Thank you I have put it on the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:70:DAE5:C506:9138:5C45:DA0D (talk) 15:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Replied at Talk:Hina Khan#Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2020 guest appearances. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 02:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- She was NOT apart of korean girl group TWICE. You are probably mistaken
- I’ve... never said so. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!)
- She was NOT apart of korean girl group TWICE. You are probably mistaken
Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Hi Ganbaruby,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.
Please do not remove my edits while I am editing
Hi, I was working to improve the article and you removed my edits while I was adding citations with the comment that I did not add citations.
This is not very inclusive or constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.74.84.197 (talk) 07:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for not immediately deleting my comment after I finished editing it the second time!
- Whenever you hit the "Publish changes", your changes go live for the entire world to see; therefore, by that time you are expected to deliver a "finished product", which means it should be properly cited already. There is no way for other editors to know if it's still a work in progress or not, and unsourced material may be removed immediately. If you would like the ability to save an unfinished change and come back to it later, consider creating an account, which gives you access to your personal sandbox page to make test edits and save your progress. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 08:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Kenosha Riots Talk Page
Hi, I seem to be unable to edit the talk page anymore, I'm not sure if user Aquillion somehow disabled me. This was after they reverted your edit, and repeated their simple to verify, totally incorrect claim, that only the USAToday article refers to police vehicles. This, after I had responded to them to please check the CBC article again for the sentence I quoted. Aquillion further claims, as a basis for their revert, that it is clearly controversial suggestion, when in fact they are the only one to find it controversial (other discussion is as to the exact term, "vehicle", "car", "tactical vehicle" etc). Lastly, if there is some pedantic reason that my understanding of the source articles is open to interpretation, it is easy enough to verify my understanding by watching the video they each include - it shows only vehicles, exactly as described. 108.15.33.17 (talk) 14:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- The talk page is currently semi-protected until tomorrow, as requested at WP:RFPP (permalink: [1]). I'm not going to further discuss the dispute here, and I've left another comment at the talk page. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 14:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Promotional Post Re-do
I had the following edit removed because it was promotional (and I agree).
Since 1996 the space has been occupied by Mulvaney's B&L, a restaurant specializing in hand-crafted New American cuisine, a farm-to-table devotee that celebrates the efforts of the grower→s, ranchers, brewers and winemakers. The interior of the firehouse has been subdivided to include a dining room, main and expediting kitchens and open areas for food prep, as well as private dining rooms.
Would the following be acceptable?
Since 1996 the space has housed a restaurant Mulvaney's B&L. The interior of the firehouse has been modified to accommodate dining rooms and other restaurant services. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidh1970 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Davidh1970: That would be fine, but do you have a reliable, independent source to back up your claim? ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 22:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
@Ganbaruby: Aside from their webpage and having been there several times? No. It's OK, I just stumbled on the page and though it be interesting to note that it now housed a restaurant now and wasn't an abandoned old firehouse. I'll forget about it. Davidh1970 (talk) 22:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 27 August 2020
Hi, Ganbaruby! Regarding your thoughts on my reference to Janine di Giovanni's Bernard Lown Humaritarian Award, please reconsider. The award is one of the most prestigious honors given by the University of Maine. Di Giovanni's selection was the subject of this recent newspaper article https://bangordailynews.com/2020/08/25/news/bangor/war-correspondent-janine-di-giovanni-named-recipient-of-university-of-maine-2020-humanitarian-award/. If you do not want to list it as I presented, would you list the award among di Giovanni's other awards noted on her Wikipedia page? Thanks for your consideration. Dodgeretti14 Dodgeretti14 (talk) 15:58, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Dodgeretti14: Sorry for the late reply, but in short, no. Anyone can hand out an award, but not all belong on a list of awards since they don't meet Wikipedia's notability guideline (see WP:LSC). Too many non-notable awards make the article sound promotional and therefore failing WP:NPOV. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 05:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Mark Andrews Pixar
Heres my source on why I edited him out of the upcoming Pixar movies list https://forum.pixarpost.com/post/2022-projects-10636642?&trail=15 https://www.pixarpost.com/2019/10/pixars-next-7-films-2020-2024.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.170.248.187 (talk) 18:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Neither of those are reliable sources. Pixar Post seems to be a self-published source with little editorial oversight, and the first link is a web forum. Look for official press releases or news organizations instead. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 22:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
But they literally learned this when they visited Pixar, theyre reliable theyre good people — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.170.248.187 (talk) 20:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- According to who? Anyone can claim to have visited Pixar, and I can't just take your word for it that the source is reliable. I bet they're good people, but for Wikipedia's standards we need sources with a track record of reliability. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 14:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Edits to NSNA
Hello - I was in the process of Updating the NSNA page and all the edits have been removed. Current president history etc. I linked the sources so the information could be verified.