Jump to content

User talk:BilCat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 178.222.117.254 (talk) at 16:55, 24 September 2020 (→‎Military). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

HEMI-DEMI-SEMI-RETIRED

This user is somewhat active on Wikipedia, and limits his activities to a small range of pages and mostly non-contentious discussions. There may be periods in which the user is not active due to life issues.

My sincere apologies.

Sorry, next time I will use better judgment.

--Josephearlhebert (talk) 14:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Wikipedia has a steep learning curve, and it takes a while to get proficient. Take your time, and when in doubt, you can always ask on a talk page. Take care. BilCat (talk) 18:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

It appears Washington High School (Georgia), should be Booker T. Washington High School (Georgia). I can't move it per previous comments regarding redirects.RickH86 (talk) 19:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look at it in a little while. Ping me tomorrow if I forget. :) BilCat (talk) 19:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Booker T. Washington High School (Georgia) is blank. You should be able to move it. Perhaps you misspelled something, or there is another issue. Would you try it again? I'll. move it if it doesn't work for you this time. BilCat (talk) 20:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@RickH86: Have you tried to move it again yet? I'd like to see if there's an issue with your account somewhere, as you should have been able to move it. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 18:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't but I just tried and was able to move it. Thanks RickH86 (talk) 19:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Glad it worked! BilCat (talk) 19:04, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hawker Hunter

Comments moved to Talk:Hawker Hunter#Hawker Hunter in Chile. BilCat (talk)

Removed content

I saw at the Japan Self-Defence Forces page to user removed sourced content and to you restored that, but he did it again, seems as vandalism or user has some personal views but I checked history and seems to he really has some problem with that sourced content about China. And I checked sources and yes really mentions China and shift of focus from Soviet Union. 178.221.254.97 (talk) 03:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've restored it again. BilCat (talk) 06:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC
@Telsho: Stop acting like a vandal, and you won't be treated like one. And if you have an issue with cited content, take it to the article's talk page. BilCat (talk)
And an account that's less than two months old is NOT a regular. Unless you're also a sock. BilCat (talk) 06:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I saw you restored that content, I don't get why is that big deal about China? Maybe we should call that guy who is the prime minister of Japan and ask him why the focus is shifted from the Soviet Union to China. And why is that published in one relevant source. :))) I don't get it, North Korea note is not removed by any editor but just that note about the focus on China is kind of big problem for some. Even if it is sourced. 178.221.254.97 (talk) 07:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know either. But if they keep removing it, they're likely to get blocked. BilCat (talk) 07:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Military

Check that article Military. User changed that rankings of militaries, blanked credit suisse source what is kind of academic and added some blog called globalfirepower as a source. I think to it is wrong and to it is just a blog and it looks like a mess. So check it maybe it is just some vandalism and that article is protected and me as IP can't revert it or change it. Cheers! 178.222.117.254 (talk) 14:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably best if you raise the issue on that article's talk page. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 16:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Checked talk page and there is talk about to credit suisse source is relevant source and to until there is new one list by relevant source come to it is not changed. Also checked history of that article and users already reverted stuff from that blog. 178.222.117.254 (talk) 16:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]