Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deangelo Martin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deangelo Martin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Following BLPN discussion, this article should be deleted as a violation of WP:BLPCRIME. The subject has not yet been convicted of any such crime[1], article admits as much, instead only charged at the moment. The article cannot be salvaged currently, so I don't think anything less than deletion will resolve the issue. I've no issue with recreation if the subject ends up convicted. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Multiple BLPCRIME violations with only claim to notability being not yet proven allegations. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment: This person is currently standing trial. That only compounds the BLP problem. This article should not exist. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No claims to notability outside of what they are accused of, clear violation of BLPCRIME. --J04n(talk page) 13:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.