User talk:Jiv arshu

Your deletion requests

I have just declined your CSD on Draft:Million Dollar Productions because the rationale is wholly invalid. I see you have chosen to nominate severls drafts for deletion because a main space redirect exists. Please stop. Fiddle Faddle 08:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fiddle ok i am reverting my changes ThanksBlue Birds(talk) 08:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have a large number of editors to apologise to. Revert 100% of your CSD nominations first oklease. Also see Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism where your actions have been reported as a matter of urgency

I am making a firm suggestion to you that you learn about policies before using a deletion mechanism again. This is not an instruction, but the suggestion will be taken into account by admins against future action Fiddle Faddle 08:49, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Fiddle i have reverted my CSD edits and i will be carefull next time. Blue Birds(talk) 08:51, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please ensure that the editors concerned know you were in error, by which I mean all of them. Those who create drafts are generally new users. We must very aware that they will feel upset. Fiddle Faddle 08:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Got It, Thanks Fiddle Faddle for the your information. I have reverted my all CSD Edites, Please check and tell me Is this ok or not?? Blue Birds(talk) 08:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to trust that you have done so. Our reputation is made or lost by the quality of our edits.

Pretty obviously you have had a basic misunderstanding of what draft space is used for. What help may I be in explaining that to you, please? Fiddle Faddle 09:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are also the unusual reasons, see below. I find those quite concerning Fiddle Faddle 09:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK Fiddle

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Wibsey A.F.C

Hello Jiv arshu. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Wibsey A.F.C, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Manifestly not Wikipedia:Patent nonsense: "Wibsey A.F.C is an amateur football club based in the Wibsey area of Bradford" quite clearly indicates what it is about. . Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 08:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Shirt58: Please see above discussion. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shirt58 I just revereted my all CSD edited which are made by me. Blue Birds(talk) 09:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jiv arshu: Thank you. I think it would be best if you concentrate on building and improving articles rather than trying to get them deleted. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another speedy delete declined

I have declined your speedy delete request for Draft:Maksim Tujković. It was not promotional. Thanks for reverting many of your nominations as rationales were flawed. Stop tagging pages for deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Graeme Bartlett I reverted all my CSD edits and from next time i will be careful. Thanks Blue Birds(talk) 11:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Counter-Inflation Act 1973 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Counter-Inflation Act 1973, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle Faddle 11:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, you appear to be confused about the UK and Fiji. Fiddle Faddle 12:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lappula barbata

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lappula barbata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:117484-1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle 12:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lappula squarrosa might help Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May I direct you to WP:AFC

Lookking at the two articles you have created already today, neither is sutiable for iunclusion in Wikipedia as it stands. One is a copyright violation, the other is imperfectly referenced. We welcome your contrinutions to Wikipedia and would like to help you to improve.

AFC allows you to receive direct guidance from experienced editors in order to make your life much easier when creating articles. It means that they are not subject to immediate action by other editors, such as the two actions I have just performed. Fiddle Faddle 12:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Counter-Inflation Act 1973 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Counter-Inflation Act 1973. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 12:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kalyana Vaibhogam (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalyana Vaibhogam (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalyana Vaibhogam (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 12:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Fiddle I had just translated from simple wikipedia. you can delete it if you want to thanks Blue Birds(talk) 12:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Wikipedia is just that, simple. It has a far easier scheme of rules and requirements than the English language Wikipedia.

I am concerned about your editing pattern Fiddle Faddle 12:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Fiddle then should i make draft and submit it for reviews?? Blue Birds(talk) 12:46, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the moment I think that would be very wise. You will learn a lot by doing so. You will become more productive by working far slower. Fiddle Faddle 12:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Faddle So from now i will make the articles in Draft and after that i will submit it for review. Because i want to become best editer in wikipedia and i dont want more warnings in my talk page. Thanks Blue Birds(talk) 12:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A very laudable ambition. First learn your trade, like any apprentice. You may find this essay, one of many essays on good practices, useful. Fiddle Faddle 12:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Fiddle Please check my Recent draft Draft:Miney (disambiguation) Thanks Blue Birds(talk) 13:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]