Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neurohop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JGHowes ^talk 22:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neurohop

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable genre that has no meaningful coverage, even in books. the little that can be found are circular back to Wikipedia or blogs. Praxidicae (talk) 23:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the nominator. I can find nothing solid by way of sources. The pieces cited certainly seem the best two. The rest is just music tracks and mirrors. There is a grand total of three tracks on Soundcloud. When I came to the internet radio site that said ‘Listen to 0 Neurohop stations’ I stopped looking. Mccapra (talk) 04:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.