User talk:MrsSnoozyTurtle
If you would like help regarding a draft article, I request the following: 1) please place the text at the bottom of this page, 2) please include a link to the draft in question and 3) please sign your posts (place "~~~~" at the end). I am happy to give explanations for any review comments, but please do not request a follow-up review or re-check the draft; there is a large backlog and someone will get to it when they can. Otherwise I may not respond to your request. Cheers, 1292simon.
Hi Simon, regarding the article European Training network Of PhD researchers on Innovative EMI analysis and power Applications I created, I disclose that I am a PhD researcher with this project. All resources are checked and the promotional tone were removed. This article was created only the purpose to create an encyclopedia article, like this Smart Cities EMC Network for Training project. Lu Wan (talk) 10:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Lu Wan. Thanks for the message, however this is not the correct place for Paid Editor disclosures. Please see WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 22:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Simon, thanks so much for pointing out the right places to put this disclosure. I have added it on my own user page. I will also put it on the article. Lu Wan (talk) 07:35, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Simon, thanks so much for your effort for this article. However, this article due to many issues like COI and promotional phrases was deleted by Sandstein. I created a userspace to make a draft from the begin in order to write an encyclopedia article with a neutral point of view. Also I discolsed the information in my user page. Could you please help me to review the draft hereUser:Lu Wan/European Training network Of PhD researchers on Innovative EMI analysis and power Applications ?Lu Wan (talk) 15:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Lu. You're welcome. The appropriate process in this situation is to request a Wikipedia:Deletion review. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 21:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Simon, thanks for your answer. I should request a deletion review instead of drafting a new one directly. Thanks for your advice. I learnt a lot indeed during this process. Cheers.Lu Wan (talk) 07:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, 1292simon, thanks so much for your contribution and review of this article. I really appreciate your kind help. Also thanks so much for your clarification about the deletion reason. I am afraid that I could not conduct WP:DRV at this moment, since the deletion reason about notability is not solved with lack of independent sources regarding WP:ORG. As you said only an interview from local television station is independent. However, I have to say that indeed I have COI, the purpose of my creation of this article is just to create encyclopaedic content about this project. I am so sorry at the beginning of the draft I put too much irrelevant content and it is biased from the content. After I learnt the basics of drafting wikipedia article I just realized it was not proper.
Since I need to do some research about independent sources, it seems not appropriate right now to conduct WP:DRV. I could contribute to the draft of this article in the future or conduct WP:DRV until it is notable enough with many independent coverages to have a wikipedia page. Thanks again for help, I learnt many things from reviewers like you in wikipedia. Cheers Lu Wan (talk) 21:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi 1292simon. You declined a previous submission of this draft for more sources. I believe these have been addressed by the author. If you are fine with what has been addressed, it should be okay to accept the submission. — LeoFrank Talk 16:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi LeoFrank. Thanks for your message and your efforts to improve the references in the draft. If you believe it is ready for publication, you are welcome to click the Submit button and hopefully a reviewer will look at it soon. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 21:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Redirecting
Please do not redirect articles about national television stations that have many references and have been edited by many editors apart from coi ones. Such redirects without consensus are highly disruptive, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello 1292Simon, thank you for visiting this page. The subject in discussion is a global brand and the citations provided are from very reputed publications in India as well as across the globe. May you please guide on the improvements that needs to be practiced for the document so that the inclusion is permitted.