User talk:Setog1

November 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Chris Sununu, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Hirolovesswords (talk) 05:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly disagree with your statement. All my statements are back with sources. Thank you

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Chris Sununu. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Hirolovesswords (talk) 15:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All my source are legitimate and are using annual reports and published media. You are suppressing information. You're being vague intentionally to suppress our right to education.

Hirolovesswords you need to find something better to do that work for the GOP by censoring legitimate information. A company's public filings and NPR are real and true sources. Shame on you

Setog1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Setog1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Chris Sununu, you may be blocked from editing. Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Setog1 (talk) 03:26, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Talk!, Hirolovesswords (talk) is being abusive and censoring legitimate information. I would like to report him.