Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Şemsiruhsar Hatun

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shameran81 (talk | contribs) at 22:49, 20 November 2020 (fixed grammar). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Şemsiruhsar Hatun

Şemsiruhsar Hatun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject doesn't appear to be notable on her own. The article's creator who has worked on various articles related to the Ottoman dynasty personally asked me to put it up for deletion. Sources do not contain any information about her background whatsoever, and the only thing known about her is that she had a daughter with the sultan. Based on its current status it doesn't meet the criteria we have for establishing notability (notability is not inherited or passed on to individuals by their relatives). The page can either be deleted or redirected to the article about her husband. Keivan.fTalk 05:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:12, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:12, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

keep I see this article as an example of what Wikipedia does best, bring to light interesting historical figures and offer stub pages that others can then improve and dive into future research. I appreciate that work was initially done to surface the two books here by Leslie Pierce and M. Çağatay Uluçay that describe this person, perhaps there are more! I'd like to see more effort to surface more sources -- perhaps this is of interest to more Turkish-language editors -- rather than deletion / subsumption into the article about her husband. I'm not sure of what relevance the conversation that Keivan.f reports having with the article's initial creator has to this AfD. Shameran81 (talk) 21:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]