Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discover Deadly
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Carbunup River, Western Australia. Please stop telling users in advance of any actions that they arevignorant. Spartaz Humbug! 21:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Discover Deadly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Similar to Bunbury Wildlife Park, this appears to be a local attraction with a lack of substantial third-party coverage outside of a hundred TripAdvisor hits. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 01:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 01:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete lacks notability. Balle010 (talk) 05:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Carbunup River, Western Australia - the park is already mentioned at that page. Not enough notability for a separate article but the suburb redirect is an appropriate alternative to deletion. Deus et lex (talk) 11:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clarkcj12 (talk) 06:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clarkcj12 (talk) 06:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - and before an ignorant nominator closes this to say redirect is inappropriate, I'm suggesting it is best redirected there because the content is better placed in the subject article than in its own one. Deus et lex (talk) 12:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.