Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biff Naylor

Biff Naylor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline A7 eligible article for a subject that blatantly falls short of WP:BIO as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, is this where I defend my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biff_Naylor Please forgive my poor coding skills, I'm sorta new at this. I made some changes and additions that I hope will address the concerns. @Celestina007

For a biographical article, the subject of the article must satisfy WP:BIO that is they must have been discussed with in-depth in reliable sources independent of them & the subject of your article doesn’t satisfy that. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Celestina007 Did you see the additions I made to the story - and additional sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nixols (talk • contribs) 18:23, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, content looks somewhat viable. Geschichte (talk) 20:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:48, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. content is significant to California lifestyle and Googie architecture, as well as Restaurant industry importance. Accurately sourced.Intenseca (talk) 08:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Intenseca[reply]

This is the user's second ever edit after a 15-year hiatus. Geschichte (talk) 10:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does your comment add to a thoughtful discussion? For a notable and honored figure in the hospitality industry, and for a major contributor to the unique and fascinating Southern California lifestyle, the article adds historical significance and well-sourced information to the Wikipedia service. The well composed article meets the standards and exacting, non-compromising values that are detailed on this site. Please re-read the first paragraph regarding commenting on other users. Thank you. Intenseca Intenseca (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It simply makes people wonder why a user made his/her second edit in a discussion. Geschichte (talk) 10:46, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable restaurateur. Cbl62 (talk) 22:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Coverage in San Jose Mercury-News, Los Angeles magazine, and Los Angeles Times appears to qualify for notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable enough for inclusion per WP:GNG. --KartikeyaS (talk) 16:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]