Jump to content

Talk:British Aerospace ATP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 109.190.55.91 (talk) at 05:26, 12 December 2020 (→‎Co-Branding: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAviation: Aircraft C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
B checklist
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the aircraft project.

"ATP"

What does the "ATP" in "BAe ATP" stand for? 212.84.100.119 (talk) 17:42, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced Turbo-Prop. Redalert2fan (talk) 17:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Co-Branding

While it would be cumbersome to explain the reasons and effects of Co-branding wherever it occurs, could somebody shed some more light on the way that the ATP was renamed Jetstream 61? The improvements which where certainly real and felt by crew and passengers do, in my opinion, not justify the act and did not with other aircraft.

“In my times” and in a former life, the ATP was utterly disliked as a “customer” which needed special treatment, as well as by those who had to handle it in the diverse meanings of the expression. “Our guess” had been that the comparably cool Jetstreams should serve to lift the reputation and market-value of the ATP.

Correct me, by all means, if you know to do it. TIA 109.190.55.91 (talk) 05:26, 12 December 2020 (UTC) (Psycho Chicken, forgot to log-in)[reply]