Talk:For Official Use Only

United States: Government Stub‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Untitled

If I'm not mistaken, since this text originated from a U.S. Government website, it is public domain. Aldrich Hanssen (talk) 16:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have begun updating this article to be compliant with the DoDM 5200.01 published 24 February 2012. I kinda blew it on references. As I indicated in my initial edit, I personally certify that the information contained in the four volumes of DoDM 5200.01 and the website upon which they are hosted are Approved for Public Release per official U.S. DoD policy. I don't edit Wikis much, so I'm a bit baffled at what went wrong. Help would be much appreciated. casual disregard (talk) 20:41, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Old use?

Pacific Missile Test Center used to print "For Official Use Only" on the telephone directory. I guessed it meant "Not for commercial use." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.196.121.15 (talk) 02:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's unlikely the meaning shifted. My first hand experience is FOUO basically means "unclassified, but don't share it unnecessarily and shred it when you're done with it". It'd be nice to find a reference that clarifies this. Anyway, examples I've seen include unclassified agendas for symposiums, teaching materials for courses on security, and mailing lists. It's stuff that doesn't need to be classified or would be rendered useless by classifying it, but should be controlled because it would make life easier for people who mean harm. (Knowing who works at a test center, or what was discussed at a conference, may tell a spy who they need to be friends with). In practice it's close to what private companies consider 'proprietary'. The place where I work won't let you give the phone book either. 151.190.40.1 (talk) 16:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

cui vs fouo

I'm confused. Does CUI supersede FOUO or is FOUO one of the markings that falls under CUI? By this I mean in the future will documents be labeled CUI or FOUO?--Drewder (talk) 14:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CUI has superseded FOUO for all new controlled unclassified documents, per DoDI 5200.48. Refer to https://www.ndia.org/policy/recent-posts/2020/3/16/dod-released-new-controlled-unclassified-information-instruction 129.246.254.12 (talk) 15:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on For Official Use Only. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080822052147/http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pub1.html to http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pub1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]