Jump to content

User talk:AHC300

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AHC300 (talk | contribs) at 05:58, 30 December 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

December 2020

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Legality of bestiality in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Some1 (talk) 15:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Everything I edited and added is up to date information on legality of bestiality, including Wisconsin felony penalty increase or Maryland changes. https://legiscan.com/MD/bill/HB81/2020 https://legiscan.com/WI/bill/SB139/2019 https://web.archive.org/web/20161228150534/http://www.csom.org/pubs/50%20state%20survey%20adult%20registries.pdf AHC300 (talk) 16:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You made an edit here stating that bestiality is "Illegal statewide, excluding the counties of Erie, Fulton, Huron, Lucas, Ottawa, Sandusky, Williams and Wood" and "Legal in the counties of Erie, Fulton, Huron, Lucas, Ottawa, Sandusky, Williams and Wood" using this document as a reference, but none of that is supported by the reference at all. Please stop misrepresenting sources and adding WP:OR to this article or any other article for that matter; this is not the first time you've done so and you've done it multiple times. Some1 (talk) 16:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
https://patch.com/ohio/cleveland/court-s-ruling-made-bestiality-legal-8-ohio-counties-one-legislator-wants-fix https://legiscan.com/OH/text/HB350/id/2054887 "Section 4.The amendments to sections 959.15, 959.21, and959.99 of the Revised Code by thisact are intended to re-enactthe amendments to those sections made by Sub. S.B. 331 of the131st General Assembly that were severed by the Sixth DistrictCourt of Appeals of Ohio in Toledo v.Ohio, 2018-Ohio-4534; 2018Ohio App. LEXIS 4854 (6th Dist.) due to the determination thatthose provisionsviolated the one subject rule established underArticle II, Section 15(D) of the Ohio Constitution." AHC300 (talk) 05:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]