Armenian national awakening: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Khoikhoi (talk | contribs)
71,605 edits
m Reverted edits by 205.148.53.200 (talk) to last version by ROOB323
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Front page of ARF newslatter second quarter in 1914.jpg|thumb|230px|[[Hunchak]] newsletter]]
[[Image:Front page of ARF newslatter second quarter in 1914.jpg|thumb|230px|[[Hunchak]] newsletter]]
'''Armenian rebellions in the Ottoman Empire''' covers the activities of ethnic [[Armenians|Armenian]] citizens of the [[Ottoman Empire]] to obtain independence, similar to other non-Ottoman ethnic groups in the empire starting around 1880 to the period of the [[Armenian genocide]] (1915&ndash;1917). <ref>{{cite web
'''Armenian rebellions in the Ottoman Empire''' covers the activities of ethnic [[Armenians|Armenian]] citizens of the [[Ottoman Empire]] to obtain independence, similar to other non-Ottoman ethnic groups in the empire starting around 1880 to the period of the [[Caucasus Campaign]] (1915&ndash;1917). <ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.ermenisorunu.gen.tr/english/armenian_issue/role_of_church.html
|url=http://www.ermenisorunu.gen.tr/english/armenian_issue/role_of_church.html
|title= HOW THE ARMENIAN ISSUE CAME ABOUT
|title= HOW THE ARMENIAN ISSUE CAME ABOUT
Line 30: Line 30:
[[Image:Fedayees.JPG|thumb|200px|right|[[Fedayee]] group fighting under the [[Armenian Revolutionary Federation]]]]
[[Image:Fedayees.JPG|thumb|200px|right|[[Fedayee]] group fighting under the [[Armenian Revolutionary Federation]]]]
{{Seealso|Revolution}}
{{Seealso|Revolution}}
As the ([[Millet (Ottoman Empire)|Millets]]) was broken, Armenians began gradually to reject the theocratic system ([[Armenian Apostolic Church]]) of the Ottoman empire as a political control (move from theocratic to a democratic system) which was set under the [[Millet (Ottoman Empire)#Armenians|Ottoman Armenian Millet]], and so rethink their position in the world. In this analysis the Armenian subjects of the Empire began to hear from European educated fellow Armenians ([[Armenian diaspora]]) and the Protestant missionaries with their network of congregations and schools throughout [[Ottoman Empire]]. Even though their initial aim was to conversion ([[Mission (Christian)]]) of the Muslims and Jews, they soon became involved with [[Protestant Reformation|reformation]] (see:[[Protestant Reformation]]) of the Christian Armenians. The [[mission (Christian)]] activities quickly transferred the European intellectual currents such as ideas of [[French revolution]] to the 23,000 Armenian students within 127 Protestant congregations with 13,000 communicants, and 400 schools <ref>G. Warneck, Outline of a History of Protestant Missions (Edinburgh and London, 1901), p. 241.</ref>. Ottoman Armenians educated with the [[Western|European Way]] {{dn}} began to make attempts at political organization – [[secret society|secret societies]], local groups and so forth. In 1881, the 'Protectors of the Fatherland', was established in Erzerum. Protectors of the Fatherland aimed to defend the Armenian population against the Kurds and Turks; but it was almost certainly affected by the ideas of [[French revolution]] as 'Freedom or Death' was their motto <REF>The Times, 10 January 1883, p. 5; ibid., 8 June 1883, p. 5</REF>.
As the ([[Millet (Ottoman Empire)|Millets]]) was broken, Armenians began gradually to reject the theocratic system ([[Armenian Apostolic Church]]) of the Ottoman empire as a political control (move from theocratic to a democratic system) which was set under the [[Millet (Ottoman Empire)#Armenians|Ottoman Armenian Millet]], and so rethink their position in the world. In this analysis the Armenian subjects of the Empire began to hear from European educated fellow Armenians ([[Armenian diaspora]]) and the Protestant missionaries with their network of congregations and schools throughout [[Ottoman Empire]]. Even though their initial aim was to conversion ([[Mission (Christian)]]) of the Muslims and Jews, they soon became involved with [[Protestant Reformation|reformation]] (see:[[Protestant Reformation]]) of the Christian Armenians. The [[mission (Christian)]] activities quickly transferred the European intellectual currents such as ideas of [[French revolution]] to the 23,000 Armenian students within 127 Protestant congregations with 13,000 communicants, and 400 schools <ref>G. Warneck, Outline of a History of Protestant Missions (Edinburgh and London, 1901), p. 241.</ref>. Ottoman Armenians educated with the [[Western|European Way]] {{dn}} began to make attempts at political organization – [[secret society|secret societies]], local groups and so forth. In 1881, the 'Protectors of the Fatherland', was established in Erzerum. Protectors of the Fatherland aimed to incite the Armenian population against the Kurds and Turks; but it was almost certainly affected by the ideas of [[French revolution]] as 'Freedom or Death' was their motto <REF>The Times, 10 January 1883, p. 5; ibid., 8 June 1883, p. 5</REF>.


===Humanitarian intervention===
===Humanitarian intervention===
Line 36: Line 36:
[[Image:Armenian martyrdom portrayed-1918.png|thumb|200px|Asking USA's intervention ([[Wilsonian Armenia]])]]
[[Image:Armenian martyrdom portrayed-1918.png|thumb|200px|Asking USA's intervention ([[Wilsonian Armenia]])]]
After the Greek revolution of 1821, the Great Powers—England, France, and Russia—became increasingly involved in Ottoman affairs using the "[[capitulations of the Ottoman Empire]]." Protectorate structure give powers reason to support the independence struggles of Ottoman subjects as opportunities to achieve their own strategic interests under the guise of “humanitarian intervention.”
After the Greek revolution of 1821, the Great Powers—England, France, and Russia—became increasingly involved in Ottoman affairs using the "[[capitulations of the Ottoman Empire]]." Protectorate structure give powers reason to support the independence struggles of Ottoman subjects as opportunities to achieve their own strategic interests under the guise of “humanitarian intervention.”
The [[History of the Balkans#National Awakening in the Balkans|national awakining in the Balkans]] ended with uprisings which were harshly repressed and also the plight of Armenians to Tsar urged the Russian intervention in 1877-1878. After the [[Treaty of San Stefano]] Russia gained control over a large part of Armenia become the protectorate of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire (a protectorate clause) and obtained the independence of Romania (see:[[National awakening of Romania]]) and Serbia . However, Russia had to step back as a result of the English and German pressure. Russian intervention gained a protectorate to the Armenian national movement but fall short establishing the Armenian state. 1878 was marked for the down turn of relations between Armenians and Ottoman Empire.
The [[History of the Balkans#National Awakening in the Balkans|national awakining in the Balkans]] ended with uprisings which were harshly repressed and also the plight of Armenians to Tsar urged the Russian intervention in 1877-1878. After the [[Treaty of San Stefano]] Russia gained control over a large part of Armenia become the protectorate of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire (a protectorate clause) and obtained the independence of Romania (see:[[National awakening of Romania]]) and Serbia . However, Russia had to step back as a result of the English and German pressure. Russian intervention gained a protectorate to the Armenian national movement but fell short of establishing the Armenian state. 1878 was marked for the down turn of relations between Armenians and Ottoman Empire.


The first effective intervention (or response to Armenian martyrdom) had come by the [[Woodrow Wilson]] who agreed to transfer what will be named as "[[Wilsonian Armenia]]" back to the Armenians in the [[Treaty of Sèvres]].
The first effective intervention (or response to Armenian martyrdom) had come by the [[Woodrow Wilson]] who agreed to transfer what will be named as "[[Wilsonian Armenia]]" back to the Armenians in the [[Treaty of Sèvres]].
Line 42: Line 42:
==Between three Empires==
==Between three Empires==
{{Seealso|Armenian diaspora}}
{{Seealso|Armenian diaspora}}
Before the 20th century Armenians mainly lived in the intersection of three empires, [[Ottoman Empire]], [[Russian Empire]] and [[Persian Empire]]. Although an [[Armenian diaspora]] existed since the Armenian loss of statehood in 1375 (when the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia fell to the Mamelukes), it grew in size only after the 1915 [[Armenian Genocide]]. Most of the Armenian diaspora before the 20th century were composed of the elite (high [[socioeconomic]] status) part whom were being educated or performing the trade. It was expected that the movements will cover the three empires, not only inside (local forms such as "''Protectors of the Fatherland''") but also in Europe, such as [[Geneva]]. The organization that was founded in [[Geneva]] (Europe), mostly by active Russian Armenians, took the idea of nationalism and gave it a clear imprint of Caucasian revolutionary thought in 1887. <ref>Nalbandian, Armenian Revolutionary Movement, p. 115.</ref> . Caucasian revolutionary thought was directed to Ottoman Empire, which as a diaspora saw it as homeland. The Armenians in Europe ([[Armenian diaspora]]) began to hold meetings about their oppressed status leading to the foundation of parties that will formalize the "national politics" under [[Armenakan]]s, [[Hnchakian]]s, and [[Armenian Revolutionary Federation]] with the coming years. These secret societies (or parties for some) which developed the "National Politics" stated goals as "freeing the Armenians from the [[Ottoman Empire]] by any means possible". <ref>Eddie Arnavoudian; In defence of the Armenian National Liberation Movement, 2002</ref> H. K. Vartanian wrote that the Armenian revolutionary movement was a direct and necessary response to the increasingly intolerable social, economic and political conditions of the 19th century decaying and declining Ottoman Empire <ref>Vartanian; The Western Armenian Liberation Struggle, Yerevan, 1967</ref>.
Before the 20th century Armenians mainly lived in the intersection of three empires, [[Ottoman Empire]], [[Russian Empire]] and [[Persian Empire]]. Although an [[Armenian diaspora]] existed since the Armenian loss of statehood in 1375 (when the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia fell to the Mamelukes), it grew in size only after the 1915 [[Caucasus Campaign]]. Most of the Armenian diaspora before the 20th century were composed of the elite (high [[socioeconomic]] status) part whom were being educated or performing the trade. It was expected that the movements will cover the three empires, not only inside (local forms such as "''Protectors of the Fatherland''") but also in Europe, such as [[Geneva]]. The organization that was founded in [[Geneva]] (Europe), mostly by active Russian Armenians, took the idea of nationalism and gave it a clear imprint of Caucasian revolutionary thought in 1887. <ref>Nalbandian, Armenian Revolutionary Movement, p. 115.</ref> . Caucasian revolutionary thought was directed to Ottoman Empire, which as a diaspora saw it as homeland. The Armenians in Europe ([[Armenian diaspora]]) began to hold meetings about their oppressed status leading to the foundation of parties that will formalize the "national politics" under [[Armenakan]]s, [[Hnchakian]]s, and [[Armenian Revolutionary Federation]] with the coming years. These secret societies (or parties for some) which developed the "National Politics" stated goals as "freeing the Armenians from the [[Ottoman Empire]] by any means possible". <ref>Eddie Arnavoudian; In defence of the Armenian National Liberation Movement, 2002</ref> H. K. Vartanian wrote that the Armenian revolutionary movement was a direct and necessary response to the increasingly intolerable social, economic and political conditions of the 19th century decaying and declining Ottoman Empire <ref>Vartanian; The Western Armenian Liberation Struggle, Yerevan, 1967</ref>.
===Seeking help to be rescued===
===Seeking help to be rescued===
{{Seealso|National awakening of Bulgaria|Capitulation (treaty)}}
{{Seealso|National awakening of Bulgaria|Capitulation (treaty)}}
Line 48: Line 48:
[[Image:The sultan (1973) original mansell collection - San Stefano.png|thumb|200px|Negotiations for San Stefano Agreement]]
[[Image:The sultan (1973) original mansell collection - San Stefano.png|thumb|200px|Negotiations for San Stefano Agreement]]
<!--image text do not fix it-->
<!--image text do not fix it-->
Armenian national movement was clearly an international movement. However, practical center for Armenian revolutionaries was the [[Caucasus]], where Armenians could meet, organize funds, move the sources and materials to Ottoman Empire easily. [[Young Armenia Society]] founded in 1889 by [[Kristapor Mikayelian]] within [[Caucasia]] become bigger with time. <ref>Nalbandian, Armenian Revolutionary Movement, pp. 145–7.</ref> [[Young Armenia Society]] organized [[Fedayee]] campaigns into Ottoman territory. The society members believed that the Armenians can ask Russia to build a national state, such as they did by rescuing beleaguered Bulgaria. The rationalization of this idea depended on two main international political promises of British government. First came with the [[Cyprus Convention]] and then [[Treaty of Berlin, 1878]] with the article 61. As Patriarch ''Nerses Varjabedyan'' had expressed his position to British Minister of Foreign Affairs, Lord Salisbury, Britain was bound to intervene to Ottoman rule for the benefit of Armenian National cause. In 1879, one year of after the agreements, the only thing missing was the practical events (uprising) to enable the articles against the Ottoman Empire for the demand of an Armenian state. Within the next two decades the Armenian national movement had discovered through their revolutionary uprising (revolutionary movement) that neither [[Tsar Alexander II]] with his idealism nor [[William Ewart Gladstone |Gladstone]]'s Liberalism was a dependable hope to intervene the Ottoman Empire. Besides the development of ideological imprint, the Young Armenia Society was also an instrument to future organizations. [[Simon Zavarian]], who was Kristapor Mikayelian's right-hand man, was instrumental in the founding of the [[Armenian Revolutionary Federation]]. There was a very big common ground (shared methods, ideologies, workforce, etc) between these different organizations.
Armenian national movement was clearly an international movement. However, practical center for Armenian revolutionaries was the [[Caucasus]], where Armenians could meet, organize funds, move the sources and materials to Ottoman Empire easily. [[Young Armenia Society]] founded in 1889 by [[Kristapor Mikayelian]] within [[Caucasia]] become bigger with time. <ref>Nalbandian, Armenian Revolutionary Movement, pp. 145–7.</ref> [[Young Armenia Society]] organized [[Fedayee]] campaigns into Ottoman territory. The society members believed that the Armenians could ask Russia to build a national state, such as they did by rescuing beleaguered Bulgaria. The rationalization of this idea depended on two main international political promises of British government. First came with the [[Cyprus Convention]] and then [[Treaty of Berlin, 1878]] with the article 61. As Patriarch ''Nerses Varjabedyan'' had expressed his position to British Minister of Foreign Affairs, Lord Salisbury, Britain was bound to intervene to Ottoman rule for the benefit of Armenian National cause. In 1879, one year of after the agreements, the only thing missing was the practical events (uprising) to enable the articles against the Ottoman Empire for the demand of an Armenian state. Within the next two decades the Armenian national movement had discovered through their revolutionary uprising (revolutionary movement) that neither [[Tsar Alexander II]] with his idealism nor [[William Ewart Gladstone |Gladstone]]'s Liberalism was a dependable hope to intervene the Ottoman Empire. Besides the development of ideological imprint, the Young Armenia Society was also an instrument to future organizations. [[Simon Zavarian]], who was Kristapor Mikayelian's right-hand man, was instrumental in the founding of the [[Armenian Revolutionary Federation]]. There was a very big common ground (shared methods, ideologies, workforce, etc) between these different organizations.


===Unification===
===Unification===
Line 60: Line 60:
<!--image text do not fix it-->
<!--image text do not fix it-->


Russian intervention in 1877-1878 changed the political and military structure alongside newly established Russian border. With the hostilities on the border become open, numbers of [[Circassians]] and [[Laz people|Laz]] from the Russian empire emigrated (forced deportation) in the Ottoman empire which brought tensions where they settled. These migrations were changing the population distribution and balance of power within the local communities. The Russia become protectorate of Armenians (Christians) so the lands that changed hand had less on Armenian but relatively more hostile environment to the Kurds who were left under the Russian control. The Kurdish tribal leaders, who had fled during the war began to express their power along the countryside, not only to Armenian Millet but to the local non-tribal Kurds as well. The regions social structure (coexistence of the communities or ([[Millet (Ottoman Empire)|Millets]]) was clearly broken under the [[Ottoman Empire]]. The broken structure (social structure) of coexistence of the communities required implementation of new reforms with the plan of February 1882 by the Sultan. However Germany (another protector) refused to act in concert with the other powers, which 'interference with the happiness of other sovereigns' was the main reason given. Unsolved social problems began to feed the Armenian national politics.
Russian intervention in 1877-1878 changed the political and military structure alongside newly established Russian border. With the hostilities on the border become open, numbers of [[Circassians]] and [[Laz people|Laz]] from the Russian empire emigrated (forced deportation) in the Ottoman empire which brought tensions where they settled. These migrations were changing the population distribution and balance of power within the local communities. Russia became the protectorate of Armenians (Christians) so the lands that changed hands had less impact on Armenians but a relatively more hostile environment to the Kurds who were left under Russian control. The Kurdish tribal leaders, who had fled during the war began to express their power along the countryside, not only to the Armenian Millet but to the local non-tribal Kurds as well. The regions social structure (coexistence of the communities or ([[Millet (Ottoman Empire)|Millets]]) was clearly broken under the [[Ottoman Empire]]. The broken structure (social structure) of coexistence of the communities required implementation of new reforms with the plan of February 1882 by the Sultan. However Germany (another protector) refused to act in concert with the other powers, which 'interference with the happiness of other sovereigns' was the main reason given. Unsolved social problems began to feed Armenian national politics.


Russian intervention in 1877-1878 put an end to the [[Tanzimat]], which Armenian political expression was coming to age. Nonetheless, the Armenian liberation movement gathered momentum with the establishment of [[Armenian Revolutionary Federation]], [[Social Democrat Hunchakian Party]] and [[Armenakan]] (later named as [[Ramgavar]]).
Russian intervention in 1877-1878 put an end to the [[Tanzimat]], which Armenian political expression was coming to age. Nonetheless, the Armenian liberation movement gathered momentum with the establishment of [[Armenian Revolutionary Federation]], [[Social Democrat Hunchakian Party]] and [[Armenakan]] (later named as [[Ramgavar]]).
Line 71: Line 71:
The ''Social Democrat Hunchakian Party'', also known as the ''Hentchak'', is one of the oldest [[political parties]] of [[Armenia]]. It was founded in 1887 with the goal to gain Armenia's independence from the [[Ottoman Empire]]. The [[Armenian Revolutionary Federation]] came into being in 1890 through the merging of various factions of [[Armenia|Armenian]] political groups akin to the ones operating in Russia and Eastern Europe at the time. The original aim was for autonomy of the Armenian-populated areas in the Ottoman Empire. The party began to organize itself in [[Anatolia]] in the early 1890s and held its first major meeting in [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] in 1892. At that meeting the party adopted a decentralized modus operandi according to which the various chapters in different countries were allowed to plan and implement policies in tune with their local political atmosphere.
The ''Social Democrat Hunchakian Party'', also known as the ''Hentchak'', is one of the oldest [[political parties]] of [[Armenia]]. It was founded in 1887 with the goal to gain Armenia's independence from the [[Ottoman Empire]]. The [[Armenian Revolutionary Federation]] came into being in 1890 through the merging of various factions of [[Armenia|Armenian]] political groups akin to the ones operating in Russia and Eastern Europe at the time. The original aim was for autonomy of the Armenian-populated areas in the Ottoman Empire. The party began to organize itself in [[Anatolia]] in the early 1890s and held its first major meeting in [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] in 1892. At that meeting the party adopted a decentralized modus operandi according to which the various chapters in different countries were allowed to plan and implement policies in tune with their local political atmosphere.


These parties within the next decade (1880-1890) developed local communication channels. The organization was fully functional under [[Ankara]], [[Amasya]], [[Çorum]], [[Diyarbakır]], [[Yozgat]], and [[Tokat]]. In 1893 they began to use wall newspapers (newspapers like billboards) directed toward the non Armenian subjects. The main theme of these materials were people should take control of their own life (against the oppressors).<ref> Graves, Storm Centres,</ref> This ideological communicants did not have any effect on the Muslims. The main result was clashes between patriots and Ottoman police that ended with the jail time. Every jail time ended with official exchanges between two empires as Britain was the protectorate of the these patriots (Educated (European) revolutionaries who can print papers). Britain concluded that was 'more than probable' that Armenian revolutionaries (patriots) were responsible parties in this conflict. <ref>Graves, Storm Centres, p. 138</ref> They were cutting telegraph wires, bombing the odd government buildings which would have caused the sultan to panic, and local authorities act against them, however if there would be more interference (Britain or European sources) that would end with religious fanaticism, and a civil war (massacres) would occur. <ref>Graves, Storm Centres, pp. 132-139</ref>
These parties within the next decade (1880-1890) developed local communication channels. The organization was fully functional under [[Ankara]], [[Amasya]], [[Çorum]], [[Diyarbakır]], [[Yozgat]], and [[Tokat]]. In 1893 they began to use wall newspapers (newspapers like billboards) directed toward the non Armenian subjects. The main theme of these materials were people should take control of their own life (against the oppressors).<ref> Graves, Storm Centres,</ref> This ideological communicants did not have any effect on the Muslims. The main result was clashes between revolutionaries and Ottoman police that ended with the jail time. Every jail time ended with official exchanges between two empires as Britain was the protectorate of the these rebels (Educated (European) revolutionaries who can print papers). Britain concluded that was 'more than probable' that Armenian revolutionaries were responsible parties in this conflict. <ref>Graves, Storm Centres, p. 138</ref> They were cutting telegraph wires, bombing the odd government buildings which would have caused the sultan to panic and local authorities act against them, however if there would be more interference (Britain or European sources) that would end with religious fanaticism, and a civil war (massacres) would occur. <ref>Graves, Storm Centres, pp. 132-139</ref>


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 79: Line 79:
|-
|-
|1880s
|1880s
|[[Bashkaleh Resistance]]
|[[Bashkaleh Resistance|Başkale Revolt]]
|[[Armenakan|Armenakan Party]]
|[[Armenakan|Armenakan Party]]
|-
|-
|1890s
|1890s
|[[Kum Kapu Affray]]
|[[Kum Kapu Affray|Kum Kapı Affray]]
|[[Hunchak]]s (Social Democrat Hunchakian Party)
|[[Hunchak]]s (Social Democrat Hunchakian Party)
|-
|-
|
|
|[[Defense of Van]]
|[[Defense of Van|Van Uprising]]
|[[Armenakan|Armenakan Party]]
|[[Armenakan|Armenakan Party]]
|-
|-
Line 116: Line 116:
[[Category:History of Armenia]]
[[Category:History of Armenia]]
[[Category:World War I]]
[[Category:World War I]]
[[Category:Armenian Genocide]]

Revision as of 20:34, 5 April 2007

Hunchak newsletter

Armenian rebellions in the Ottoman Empire covers the activities of ethnic Armenian citizens of the Ottoman Empire to obtain independence, similar to other non-Ottoman ethnic groups in the empire starting around 1880 to the period of the Caucasus Campaign (1915–1917). [1] The early rebellions were an attempt to obtain financial advantages (breaks), but with the French revolution and the rise of nationalism under the Ottoman Empire the ideology of independence ("Freedom or Death") became dominant.[citation needed] The Greeks obtained independence in 1829, which sparked the Russo-Turkish war. The Ottomans held on to many of their other territories under very difficult conditions. [2] During this time among the Armenian elite, idea of republicanism replaced the absolute monarchy, and the Millet system of the Ottoman Armenians underwent a restructuring, which led to the establishment of the Armenian National Assembly in 1863 and took over some of the regulations of temporal matters of the Ottoman Armenian Community from the Patriarchate. While it took World War I for the establishment of First Armenian Republic, the Armenians had oscillated between the ideas of republic and autonomous region in the empire during the history of Ottoman democracy with organizations like Social Democrat Hunchakian Party and Armenakan. The Empire tried to cover the social needs by creating the Tanzimat era, the development of Ottomanism and First Constitutional Era. However, the coexistence of the communities under Ottomanism proved to be a dysfunctional solution as did the Second Constitutional Era which also ignited the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire.

Breaking down the system

See also: Millet (Ottoman Empire)
Further information: [[:French Revolution, Tanzimat, Ottomanism First Constitutional Era]]
Patriarch Nerses Varjabedian: response to a Christian administration "Only a Christian administration can provide the equality, justice and the freedom of conscience" in 1878 just after the reforms before the conflicts began

Social structure of the Empire, also the "Armenians", was based on Millet (Ottoman Empire) which was was term for a confessional community in the Ottoman Empire. It was somewhat similar to the autonomous territories that was the European norm.[citation needed] The Ottoman term specifically refers to the separate legal courts pertaining to personal law under which sections of the society were allowed to rule themselves (in cases not involving any Muslim) with fairly little interference from the Ottoman government.[citation needed] Each millet was under the supervision of an Ethnarch ('national' leader), most often a religious hierarch such as the Armenian Apostolic Church. The millets had a great deal of power - they set their own laws and collected and distributed their own taxes. During the Tanzimat period, a series of constitutional reforms provided a limited modernization of the Ottoman Empire. In 1856, the Hatt-ı Hümayun promised equality for all Ottoman citizens irrespective of their ethnicity and confession, widening the scope of the 1839 Hatt-ı Şerif of Gülhane. In 1863 the Armenian National Constitution (Ottoman Turkish:"Nizâmnâme-i Millet-i Ermeniyân") was Ottoman Empire approved form of the "Code of Regulations" composed of 150 articles drafted by the "Armenian intelligentsia", which defined the powers of Patriarch (position in Ottoman Millet) and newly formed "Armenian National Assembly". [3] The reformist period peaked with the Constitution, called the Kanûn-ı Esâsî (meaning "Basic Law" in Ottoman Turkish), written by members of the Young Ottomans, which was promulgated on 23 November 1876. It established freedom of belief and equality of all citizens before the law. "Firman of the Reforms" gave immense privileges to the Armenians, which formed a "governance in governance" to eliminate the aristocratic dominance of the Armenian nobles by development of the political strata in the society[4]. These two reforms, which were theoretically perfect examples of social change by law, brought serious stress over Ottoman political and administrative structure. Armenian Nobles (Amira) were not happy, and they were the owners of the economic system. Kagik Ozanyan claims that these regulations (formation of a political strata) incited the national (nation building by revolution) spirit[5]. General Mayewski, who was the Russian Consul General to Ottoman Empire recorded the following in 1912; [6]

The rebellion of Armenians resulted from the following three causes:(1). Their known evolution in political matters (Issue of Civilizations), (2). Development of ideas of nationalism, salvation and independence in Armenian opinion (Revolution Perspective), (3). Supporting of these ideas by Western governments and publication through the inspiration and efforts of Armenian clerical men (Humanitarian intervention).[7]

Issue of Civilizations

Main article: Clash of Civilizations

According to some authors the breakdown of the "coexistence of the communities" was a direct result of the Christian Armenians and Muslim Turks and Kurds of the Ottoman Empires inability to live together. Most of the Ottoman Sources do not give credit to these claims. They presenting the argument that because of the Millet (Ottoman Empire) system, and State and Religion (Ottoman Empire) structure which had preserved the Empire for centuries. The opposing side presents the activities of Armenian Patriarchs. Patriarch Nerses Varjabedyan expresses his position to British Minister of Foreign Affairs, Lord Salisbury on April 13 1878[8].

It is no longer possible for the Armenians and the Turks to live together. Only a Christian administration can provide the equality, justice and the freedom of conscience. A Christian administration should replace the Muslim administration. Armenia (Eastern Anatolia) and Kilikya, are the regions, where the Christian administration should be founded... The Turkish Armenians want this... That is, a Christian administration is demanded in Turkish Armenia, as in Lebanon. [9]

A strong argument behind rejecting the "clash of civilizations" (for some civil war) came with the analysis of the activity timetable. The clashes collected in distinct events. Each event had high density with distinct beginning and an end. There was no single period that thousand deaths were spread over a long period of time. This fact support the "revolutionary view" which tried to be a catalyst – to show to the European powers (which had a certain, if ill-defined, responsibility for their government) the true nature of Ottoman rule, and to force them to do something about it through the international agreements (protectorate structure). Assuredly Europe would do nothing if those thousand deaths were spread over a year.

Revolution Perspective

File:Fedayees.JPG
Fedayee group fighting under the Armenian Revolutionary Federation
See also: Revolution

As the (Millets) was broken, Armenians began gradually to reject the theocratic system (Armenian Apostolic Church) of the Ottoman empire as a political control (move from theocratic to a democratic system) which was set under the Ottoman Armenian Millet, and so rethink their position in the world. In this analysis the Armenian subjects of the Empire began to hear from European educated fellow Armenians (Armenian diaspora) and the Protestant missionaries with their network of congregations and schools throughout Ottoman Empire. Even though their initial aim was to conversion (Mission (Christian)) of the Muslims and Jews, they soon became involved with reformation (see:Protestant Reformation) of the Christian Armenians. The mission (Christian) activities quickly transferred the European intellectual currents such as ideas of French revolution to the 23,000 Armenian students within 127 Protestant congregations with 13,000 communicants, and 400 schools [10]. Ottoman Armenians educated with the European Way [disambiguation needed] began to make attempts at political organization – secret societies, local groups and so forth. In 1881, the 'Protectors of the Fatherland', was established in Erzerum. Protectors of the Fatherland aimed to incite the Armenian population against the Kurds and Turks; but it was almost certainly affected by the ideas of French revolution as 'Freedom or Death' was their motto [11].

Humanitarian intervention

See also: Treaty of San Stefano and Congress of Berlin
File:Armenian martyrdom portrayed-1918.png
Asking USA's intervention (Wilsonian Armenia)

After the Greek revolution of 1821, the Great Powers—England, France, and Russia—became increasingly involved in Ottoman affairs using the "capitulations of the Ottoman Empire." Protectorate structure give powers reason to support the independence struggles of Ottoman subjects as opportunities to achieve their own strategic interests under the guise of “humanitarian intervention.” The national awakining in the Balkans ended with uprisings which were harshly repressed and also the plight of Armenians to Tsar urged the Russian intervention in 1877-1878. After the Treaty of San Stefano Russia gained control over a large part of Armenia become the protectorate of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire (a protectorate clause) and obtained the independence of Romania (see:National awakening of Romania) and Serbia . However, Russia had to step back as a result of the English and German pressure. Russian intervention gained a protectorate to the Armenian national movement but fell short of establishing the Armenian state. 1878 was marked for the down turn of relations between Armenians and Ottoman Empire.

The first effective intervention (or response to Armenian martyrdom) had come by the Woodrow Wilson who agreed to transfer what will be named as "Wilsonian Armenia" back to the Armenians in the Treaty of Sèvres.

Between three Empires

See also: Armenian diaspora

Before the 20th century Armenians mainly lived in the intersection of three empires, Ottoman Empire, Russian Empire and Persian Empire. Although an Armenian diaspora existed since the Armenian loss of statehood in 1375 (when the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia fell to the Mamelukes), it grew in size only after the 1915 Caucasus Campaign. Most of the Armenian diaspora before the 20th century were composed of the elite (high socioeconomic status) part whom were being educated or performing the trade. It was expected that the movements will cover the three empires, not only inside (local forms such as "Protectors of the Fatherland") but also in Europe, such as Geneva. The organization that was founded in Geneva (Europe), mostly by active Russian Armenians, took the idea of nationalism and gave it a clear imprint of Caucasian revolutionary thought in 1887. [12] . Caucasian revolutionary thought was directed to Ottoman Empire, which as a diaspora saw it as homeland. The Armenians in Europe (Armenian diaspora) began to hold meetings about their oppressed status leading to the foundation of parties that will formalize the "national politics" under Armenakans, Hnchakians, and Armenian Revolutionary Federation with the coming years. These secret societies (or parties for some) which developed the "National Politics" stated goals as "freeing the Armenians from the Ottoman Empire by any means possible". [13] H. K. Vartanian wrote that the Armenian revolutionary movement was a direct and necessary response to the increasingly intolerable social, economic and political conditions of the 19th century decaying and declining Ottoman Empire [14].

Seeking help to be rescued

See also: National awakening of Bulgaria and Capitulation (treaty)
File:The sultan (1973) original mansell collection - San Stefano.png
Negotiations for San Stefano Agreement

Armenian national movement was clearly an international movement. However, practical center for Armenian revolutionaries was the Caucasus, where Armenians could meet, organize funds, move the sources and materials to Ottoman Empire easily. Young Armenia Society founded in 1889 by Kristapor Mikayelian within Caucasia become bigger with time. [15] Young Armenia Society organized Fedayee campaigns into Ottoman territory. The society members believed that the Armenians could ask Russia to build a national state, such as they did by rescuing beleaguered Bulgaria. The rationalization of this idea depended on two main international political promises of British government. First came with the Cyprus Convention and then Treaty of Berlin, 1878 with the article 61. As Patriarch Nerses Varjabedyan had expressed his position to British Minister of Foreign Affairs, Lord Salisbury, Britain was bound to intervene to Ottoman rule for the benefit of Armenian National cause. In 1879, one year of after the agreements, the only thing missing was the practical events (uprising) to enable the articles against the Ottoman Empire for the demand of an Armenian state. Within the next two decades the Armenian national movement had discovered through their revolutionary uprising (revolutionary movement) that neither Tsar Alexander II with his idealism nor Gladstone's Liberalism was a dependable hope to intervene the Ottoman Empire. Besides the development of ideological imprint, the Young Armenia Society was also an instrument to future organizations. Simon Zavarian, who was Kristapor Mikayelian's right-hand man, was instrumental in the founding of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation. There was a very big common ground (shared methods, ideologies, workforce, etc) between these different organizations.

Unification

See also: Armenian Patriotic Society of Europe

Beginning with the 1879, the Armenian national movement, began to collect distributed organizations under a unified front. The national perspective that was set during 1870s, which was solidified Cyprus Convention and then Treaty of Berlin, 1878, required a need of coordinating the patriotic activities and also a reason to build a single front. These activities will form what will become the nationalism of Armenian Diaspora.

The activities

Main article: Rise of nationalism under the Ottoman Empire
Refuges of Russian war, beginning the end of coexistence of the communities (Millets)

Russian intervention in 1877-1878 changed the political and military structure alongside newly established Russian border. With the hostilities on the border become open, numbers of Circassians and Laz from the Russian empire emigrated (forced deportation) in the Ottoman empire which brought tensions where they settled. These migrations were changing the population distribution and balance of power within the local communities. Russia became the protectorate of Armenians (Christians) so the lands that changed hands had less impact on Armenians but a relatively more hostile environment to the Kurds who were left under Russian control. The Kurdish tribal leaders, who had fled during the war began to express their power along the countryside, not only to the Armenian Millet but to the local non-tribal Kurds as well. The regions social structure (coexistence of the communities or (Millets) was clearly broken under the Ottoman Empire. The broken structure (social structure) of coexistence of the communities required implementation of new reforms with the plan of February 1882 by the Sultan. However Germany (another protector) refused to act in concert with the other powers, which 'interference with the happiness of other sovereigns' was the main reason given. Unsolved social problems began to feed Armenian national politics.

Russian intervention in 1877-1878 put an end to the Tanzimat, which Armenian political expression was coming to age. Nonetheless, the Armenian liberation movement gathered momentum with the establishment of Armenian Revolutionary Federation, Social Democrat Hunchakian Party and Armenakan (later named as Ramgavar). [16] The Social Democrat Hunchakian Party, also known as the Hentchak, is one of the oldest political parties of Armenia. It was founded in 1887 with the goal to gain Armenia's independence from the Ottoman Empire. The Armenian Revolutionary Federation came into being in 1890 through the merging of various factions of Armenian political groups akin to the ones operating in Russia and Eastern Europe at the time. The original aim was for autonomy of the Armenian-populated areas in the Ottoman Empire. The party began to organize itself in Anatolia in the early 1890s and held its first major meeting in Georgia in 1892. At that meeting the party adopted a decentralized modus operandi according to which the various chapters in different countries were allowed to plan and implement policies in tune with their local political atmosphere.

These parties within the next decade (1880-1890) developed local communication channels. The organization was fully functional under Ankara, Amasya, Çorum, Diyarbakır, Yozgat, and Tokat. In 1893 they began to use wall newspapers (newspapers like billboards) directed toward the non Armenian subjects. The main theme of these materials were people should take control of their own life (against the oppressors).[17] This ideological communicants did not have any effect on the Muslims. The main result was clashes between revolutionaries and Ottoman police that ended with the jail time. Every jail time ended with official exchanges between two empires as Britain was the protectorate of the these rebels (Educated (European) revolutionaries who can print papers). Britain concluded that was 'more than probable' that Armenian revolutionaries were responsible parties in this conflict. [18] They were cutting telegraph wires, bombing the odd government buildings which would have caused the sultan to panic and local authorities act against them, however if there would be more interference (Britain or European sources) that would end with religious fanaticism, and a civil war (massacres) would occur. [19]

Decade Event Organization
1880s Başkale Revolt Armenakan Party
1890s Kum Kapı Affray Hunchaks (Social Democrat Hunchakian Party)
Van Uprising Armenakan Party
1896 Ottoman Bank Takeover Armenian Revolutionary Federation
Khanasor Expedition Armenian Revolutionary Federation
1900s Yildiz Attempt Armenian Revolutionary Federation

See also

External links

References

  1. ^ "HOW THE ARMENIAN ISSUE CAME ABOUT". www.ermenisorunu.gen.tr. Retrieved 2006-10-09.
  2. ^ "Armenian History, chapter 8: Western Armenia". www.armenianhistory.info. Retrieved 2006-10-09.
  3. ^ Richard G. (EDT) Hovannisian "The Armenian People from Ancient to Modern Times" page 198
  4. ^ Ilber Ortayli, Tanzimattan Cumhuriyete Yerel Yönetim Gelenegi, Istanbul 1985, pp. 73
  5. ^ Esat Uras, Tarihte Ermeniler ve Ermeni Meselesi, İstanbul 1976, 5. 463;
  6. ^ General MAYEWSKI; Statistique des Provinces de Van et de Bitlis, pp. 11-13
  7. ^ General MAYEWSKI; Statistique des Provinces de Van et de Bitlis, pp. 11-13
  8. ^ F.O. 424/70, No. 134/I zikr., Bilal N. ªimsir, British Documents On Ottoman Armenians 1856-1880), Vol. I, Ankara 19R2, pp.173. Document No. 69
  9. ^ F.O. 424/70, No. 134/I zikr., Bilal N. ªimsir, British Documents On Ottoman Armenians 1856-1880), Vol. I, Ankara 19R2, pp.173. Document No. 69
  10. ^ G. Warneck, Outline of a History of Protestant Missions (Edinburgh and London, 1901), p. 241.
  11. ^ The Times, 10 January 1883, p. 5; ibid., 8 June 1883, p. 5
  12. ^ Nalbandian, Armenian Revolutionary Movement, p. 115.
  13. ^ Eddie Arnavoudian; In defence of the Armenian National Liberation Movement, 2002
  14. ^ Vartanian; The Western Armenian Liberation Struggle, Yerevan, 1967
  15. ^ Nalbandian, Armenian Revolutionary Movement, pp. 145–7.
  16. ^ "Chapter VIII: WESTERN ARMENIA (FROM 1820 TO 1913)". armenianhistory.info. Retrieved 2006-11-09.
  17. ^ Graves, Storm Centres,
  18. ^ Graves, Storm Centres, p. 138
  19. ^ Graves, Storm Centres, pp. 132-139
Rise of nationalism in the Balkans
Nationalism under the Ottoman Empire
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armenian_national_awakening&oldid=120571216"