China COVID-19 cover-up allegations: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
we do not make a distinction between central and local government for matters of international health regulations
removing - I don't see RSs stating that this was the government of China rather than Wuhan local government
Line 3: Line 3:
</noinclude>{{POV|date=July 2021}}
</noinclude>{{POV|date=July 2021}}


'''China COVID-19 cover-up''' refers to the [[Government of China]]'s efforts to hide information about the early outbreak of the [[COVID-19 pandemic in Hubei|COVID-19 in Wuhan]] in December 2019, and allegations of its efforts to inhibit the [[Origin tracing|tracing]] of [[SARS-CoV-2]]'s origins in China. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the Chinese government delayed the release of information and clamped down on discussion and reporting about it, fund and control further research into the virus's origins, and promote fringe theories about the virus.<ref>https://apnews.com/article/united-nations-health-ap-top-news-virus-outbreak-public-health-3c061794970661042b18d5aeaaed9fae</ref><ref name=ChinaClampsDownAp>{{cite news |title=China clamps down in hidden hunt for coronavirus origins |url=https://apnews.com/article/united-nations-coronavirus-pandemic-china-only-on-ap-bats-24fbadc58cee3a40bca2ddf7a14d2955 |work=AP NEWS |date=30 December 2020}}</ref> The Chinese government has stated that it did not cover up information related to the COVID-19 outbreak.<ref>{{Cite news|author=Reuters Staff|date=17 April 2020|title=China says there has never been a cover-up on coronavirus outbreak|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-mofa-idUSKBN21Z0XC|access-date=29 June 2021}}</ref>
'''China COVID-19 cover-up''' refers to allegations that the [[Government of China]] worked to inhibit the [[Origin tracing|tracing]] of [[SARS-CoV-2]]'s origins in China. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the Chinese government delayed the release of information and clamped down on discussion and reporting about it, fund and control further research into the virus's origins, and promote fringe theories about the virus.<ref>https://apnews.com/article/united-nations-health-ap-top-news-virus-outbreak-public-health-3c061794970661042b18d5aeaaed9fae</ref><ref name=ChinaClampsDownAp>{{cite news |title=China clamps down in hidden hunt for coronavirus origins |url=https://apnews.com/article/united-nations-coronavirus-pandemic-china-only-on-ap-bats-24fbadc58cee3a40bca2ddf7a14d2955 |work=AP NEWS |date=30 December 2020}}</ref> The Chinese government has stated that it did not cover up information related to the COVID-19 outbreak.<ref>{{Cite news|author=Reuters Staff|date=17 April 2020|title=China says there has never been a cover-up on coronavirus outbreak|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-mofa-idUSKBN21Z0XC|access-date=29 June 2021}}</ref>


==Cover-up of the initial Wuhan outbreak==
==Cover-up of the initial Wuhan outbreak==

Revision as of 03:43, 14 December 2021

China COVID-19 cover-up refers to allegations that the Government of China worked to inhibit the tracing of SARS-CoV-2's origins in China. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the Chinese government delayed the release of information and clamped down on discussion and reporting about it, fund and control further research into the virus's origins, and promote fringe theories about the virus.[1][2] The Chinese government has stated that it did not cover up information related to the COVID-19 outbreak.[3]

Cover-up of the initial Wuhan outbreak

As COVID-19 began spreading within China between December 2019 - February 2020, Chinese authorities prevented doctors and laboratories from sharing information about the outbreak, including admonishing frontline healthcare professionals and perceived whistleblowers, most notably, Li Wenliang.[4][5] By 27 December 2019, the local government knew there was an outbreak of pneumonia. At least one healthcare worker had already been infected, which, under international healthcare regulations, requires a country to report an outbreak to the World Health Organization (WHO), as it is considered proof of person-to-person spread. However, China did not report the outbreak to the WHO at that time. Instead, the WHO noticed a media report of the outbreak on 31 December. On 3 January, when China acknowledged the outbreak to the WHO, it called it "viral pneumonia of unknown cause", even though they had the complete genetic sequence at that time. It also said that there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission, even though 20 cases had already been confirmed among medical workers.[6]

Release of the genetic sequence

By 27 December 2019, a lab called Vision Medicals had most of the sequence of the new virus. On 2 January 2020, Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) decoded the entire sequence. By 5 January, two more labs had obtained the sequence, including the Shanghai Public Clinical Health Center led by Zhang Yongzhen, who submitted the sequence to the United States government's GenBank database. On 11 January, Zhang's lab published the sequence on virological.org. Three people stated that this angered the Chinese CDC, and the Shanghai government temporarily closed Zhang's lab.[7][8] Zhang said that the closure was not retaliation for publishing the genome, but instead was to improve the lab's biosafety protocols.[9] On 24 January the lab was accredited to research the novel coronavirus.[10] On 12 January, the WIV and the other labs released their sequences.

Silencing of medical workers

Li Wenliang was an ophthalmologist at Wuhan Central Hospital. On 30 December 2019, he had seen seven cases of a virus he thought looked like SARS. He sent a message to fellow doctors in a chat group warning them to wear protective clothing to avoid infection. He and seven other doctors were later told to come to the Public Security Bureau and told to sign a letter. The letter accused them of "making false comments" that would "disturb the social order". Wang Guangbao, who is a Chinese surgeon and science writer, later said that by 1 January, people in medical circles thought that a SARS-like virus might be spreading, but the police warning discouraged them from talking openly about it.[11] Wenliang later died of the virus, and China later apologized to his family and overturned the warning in the letter.[12][13]

A nurse said that by early January, doctors and nurses had noticed that they too were getting sick. Hospital administrators made long calls to the City Government and Health Commission. However, medical personnel were not allowed to wear protective gear, because it would cause panic. Health and governance experts place much of the blame on higher-level officials, as local authorities in China can be punished for reporting bad news.[14]

Arrest or disappearance of citizen journalists

As of December 2020, around a year after the outbreak, at least 47 journalists were currently in detention in China for their reporting on the initial coronavirus outbreak.[15]

Chinese citizen journalist Chen Qiushi started reporting on the outbreak from Wuhan on 23 January 2020. He disappeared on 6 February. On 24 September, a friend said he had been found. He was being supervised by "a certain government department", but would not face prosecution for the moment because he had not contacted opposition groups.[16][17]

Fang Bin is a Chinese citizen journalist who broadcast images of Wuhan during the outbreak several times on social media. He was arrested several times during February 2020. The last arrest was on 9 February, and as of September 2020, he had not been seen in public since.[17]

Li Zehua was reporting on the outbreak from Wuhan in February 2020. On 26 February, he was caught by the authorities after livestreaming part of the chase. On 22 April, he returned to social media with a brief statement in which he quoted a proverb that the human mind was "prone to err." A friend said he may have been told by authorities to make the statement.[18][19]

Another citizen journalist, Zhang Zhan, stopped sharing information on social media in May 2020. On 28 December, she was sentenced to 4 years in prison. According to one of her attorneys, she was convicted of "picking quarrels and provoking trouble".[20]

Doubts on official statistics

Timothy P.H. Lin and his collaborators said in May 2020 that there are doubts on some statistics from China (i.e. death tallies) because of alleged political censorship; however, come to the conclusion that due to the lack of any known deaths of Hong Kong or Taiwan residents in Mainland China, which would be newsworthy, that the official numbers do not form a particularly large discrepancy from the actual death numbers.[21]

Actions that inhibit research on the origin of COVID-19

Two universities in China published and then removed pages saying that papers about COVID-19 needed extra scrutiny before publication, in what British newspaper The Guardian suggested might be "part of a wider attempt to control the narrative surrounding the pandemic".[22] A preprint from the American Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center stated that scientists in China published and then took down COVID-19 sequences; some scientists said that this suggested "China has something to hide about the origins of the pandemic", but others countered that the information was later republished.[23] David Robertson, a virologist from the University of Glasgow UK, said he thinks the Chinese Communist Party wants the origin of SARS-CoV-2 to be a location outside of China.[24]

Control of domestic research

In January 2020, Chinese biomechanics researcher Botao Xiao released a paper saying that the virus probably came from a lab leak. He withdrew the paper after Chinese officials insisted that no lab accident had taken place.[25] In February 2021, the head of an international WHO team investigating the origins of COVID-19 said the disease is “extremely unlikely” to have come from a laboratory.[26]

According to CNN, Fudan University in China published a document describing how research into COVID-19 should be vetted. All research needs approval, and research into its origin needs extra scrutiny, with the document stating that "academic papers about tracing the origin of the virus must be strictly and tightly managed." After CNN contacted the China Education ministry's science and technology department about the notice, it was taken down. A Chinese researcher, who insisted on anonymity for fear of retaliation, said he thought the document was part of a "coordinated attempt to control the narrative" about the virus. According to The Guardian, which also described the episode, research on other medical topics is not subject to similar scrutiny.[27][28]

On 30 December 2020, the Associated Press reported that China was still controlling domestic research into the virus under direct orders from Chinese Communist Party general secretary Xi Jinping. Researchers who are authorized to investigate the virus often work closely with the military, and their research must be approved by a task force under the management of China's State Council. An order by the State Council, marked "not to be made public", said that scientific publication should be orchestrated like "a game of chess", and people who do not comply shall be held accountable.[2][29]

Actions against foreign research

The World Health Organization investigation into the source of COVID-19 was delayed over a year by negotiations over the arrangements. When the WHO-convened study was conducted during 14 January – 10 February 2021, the Chinese authorities only provided limited access.[30][31] The Chinese authorities did not share a specific list of early cases with the international team. Instead, this information was shared with a Chinese team. The Chinese team then gave the international team a summary.[32] With the line-by-line list of individual cases, the team could have contacted each person and tried to determine where they might have become infected.[33][34][35] Members of the WHO team have reiterated that the Chinese team "was and still is reluctant to share raw data (for instance, on the 174 cases identified in December 2019), citing concerns over patient confidentiality".[36]

China has closed access to an abandoned mine shaft which once contained bats who were infected by RaTG13, the closest known viral relative of COVID-19. Two researchers managed to get samples from the shaft, but their samples were confiscated. Three teams from the Associated Press were followed by Chinese security agents.[2][37]

In June 2021, a researcher at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center found 13 genome sequences that were deleted from the Sequence Read Archive following a request by researchers at Wuhan University. They were originally published by a Chinese researcher and represent samples collected near the start of the pandemic. The sequences are more distantly related to bats than the active variants of COVID-19. Researchers do not believe this finding supports either a natural or lab origin.[38][39][40]

China has refused to allow an independent investigation into the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.[41]

Disputes with other countries over proposed inquiries

After the Australian government called for an independent inquiry into the origins of COVID-19, Chinese ambassador Cheng Jingye said that Australia was treading a "dangerous path". Shortly afterwards, the Chinese government banned beef imports from Australia's four biggest abattoirs. It also put a tariff of over 80% on Australian barley and informally banned imports of Australian coal.[42][43] The Chinese government later agreed to an inquiry. An article in The Economist speculated that an inquiry "might reveal China doing more to suppress information about early infections than to quash the outbreak itself".[42]

On 25 August 2021, a US intelligence review of the source of covid was pending. China warned of a "counterattack" against any country that "baselessly accuses China" of being responsible for the origin of COVID-19.[44]

Refusal to cooperate with second phase of WHO investigation

On 15 July 2021, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said that the COVID-19 lab leak hypothesis had been prematurely discarded by the World Health Organization. He proposed a second phase of WHO investigation, which he said should take a closer look at the lab leak idea, and asked China to be "transparent" and release relevant data.[45] On 22 July 2021, Zeng Yixin of China's National Health Commission (NHC) said that China would not cooperate with the second phase, denouncing it as "shocking" and "arrogant".[46][45] The United States criticised China's position on the follow-up origin probe as "irresponsible" and "dangerous".[47] Science journalist Jon Cohen said that "[China's] relative openness to collaboration during the joint mission seems to have evaporated".[48]

References

  1. ^ https://apnews.com/article/united-nations-health-ap-top-news-virus-outbreak-public-health-3c061794970661042b18d5aeaaed9fae
  2. ^ a b c "China clamps down in hidden hunt for coronavirus origins". AP NEWS. 30 December 2020.
  3. ^ Reuters Staff (17 April 2020). "China says there has never been a cover-up on coronavirus outbreak". Reuters. Retrieved 29 June 2021. {{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  4. ^ Tan, Jianxing (31 January 2020). 新冠肺炎"吹哨人"李文亮:真相最重要. Caixin (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 31 January 2020. Retrieved 6 February 2020.
  5. ^ "Wuhan pneumonia: a "whistleblower" Li Wenliang who dared to make the epidemic public" 武汉肺炎:一个敢于公开疫情的"吹哨人"李文亮. BBC News 中文 (in Chinese). 4 February 2020. Archived from the original on 19 February 2020. Retrieved 6 February 2020.
  6. ^ "Timeline: WHO's COVID-19 response". www.who.int.
  7. ^ "China delayed releasing coronavirus info, frustrating WHO". AP NEWS. 20 April 2021.
  8. ^ "Lab that first shared coronavirus sequence closed for 'rectification'". South China Morning Post. 28 February 2020. Retrieved 26 July 2021.
  9. ^ "Nature's 10: ten people who helped shape science in 2020". www.nature.com. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  10. ^ "Lab that first shared coronavirus sequence closed for 'rectification'". South China Morning Post. 28 February 2020. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  11. ^ Shih, Gerry; Rauhala, Emily; Sun, Lena H. (1 February 2020). "Early missteps and state secrecy in China probably allowed the coronavirus to spread farther and faster". Washington Post.
  12. ^ "Li Wenliang: Coronavirus kills Chinese whistleblower doctor". BBC News. 7 February 2020.
  13. ^ "Chinese inquiry exonerates coronavirus whistleblower doctor". The Guardian. 21 March 2020. Archived from the original on 20 March 2020. Retrieved 21 March 2020.
  14. ^ "Wuhan officials face questions, anger over virus response". AP NEWS. 29 April 2021.
  15. ^ Nectar Gan and James Griffiths. "Chinese journalist who documented Wuhan coronavirus outbreak jailed for 4 years". CNN. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
  16. ^ "Coronavirus: journalist missing in Wuhan as anger towards Chinese authorities grows". the Guardian. 10 February 2020.
  17. ^ a b "Wuhan Covid journalist missing since February found, says friend". the Guardian. 24 September 2020.
  18. ^ "Missing Wuhan citizen journalist reappears after two months". the Guardian. 22 April 2020.
  19. ^ "Missing citizen journalist Li Zehua back online after 'quarantine'". South China Morning Post. 23 April 2020. Retrieved 1 June 2020.
  20. ^ Oxner, Reese (29 December 2020). "U.S. And EU Condemn Jailing Of Lawyer Who Reported On Coronavirus In Wuhan". NPR.
  21. ^ Lin, Timothy P. H.; Wan, Kelvin H.; Huang, Suber S.; Jonas, Jost B.; Hui, David S. C.; Lam, Dennis S. C. (2 October 2020). "Death tolls of COVID-19: Where come the fallacies and ways to make them more accurate". Global Public Health. 15 (10): 1582–1587. doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1808040.
  22. ^ "China clamping down on coronavirus research, deleted pages suggest". the Guardian. 11 April 2020. Retrieved 1 July 2021.
  23. ^ CohenJun. 23, Jon; 2021; Pm, 7:45 (23 June 2021). "Claim that Chinese team hid early SARS-CoV-2 sequences to stymie origin hunt sparks furor". Science | AAAS. Retrieved 1 July 2021. {{cite web}}: |last2= has numeric name (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  24. ^ Lawton, Graham (June 2021). "Did covid-19 come from a lab?". New Scientist. 250 (3337): 10–11. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(21)00938-6. PMC 8177866. PMID 34108789.
  25. ^ "Analysis | Timeline: How the Wuhan lab-leak theory suddenly became credible". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 20 June 2021.
  26. ^ "COVID-19 'extremely unlikely' to have come from a lab, experts say". United Nations. 9 February 2021. Retrieved 29 June 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  27. ^ Nectar Gan, Caitlin Hu and Ivan Watson (12 April 2020). "China imposes restrictions on research into origins of coronavirus". CNN.
  28. ^ "China clamping down on coronavirus research, deleted pages suggest". the Guardian. 11 April 2020.
  29. ^ "DocumentCloud". www.documentcloud.org.
  30. ^ Goh, Goh (13 February 2021). "China refused to provide WHO team with raw data on early COVID cases, team member says". Thomson Reuters Foundation. Reuters. Retrieved 1 August 2021.
  31. ^ "Covid-19 pandemic: China 'refused to give data' to WHO team". BBC. BBC. 14 February 2021. Retrieved 1 August 2021.
  32. ^ "WHO-convened global study of origins of SARS-CoV-2: China Part". World Health Organisation. 6 April 2021. Retrieved 1 August 2021.
  33. ^ Hernández, Javier C.; Gorman, James (12 February 2021). "On W.H.O. Trip, China Refused to Hand Over Important Data". The New York Times.
  34. ^ "A scientist adventurer and China's 'Bat Woman' are under scrutiny as coronavirus lab-leak theory gets another look". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 20 June 2021.
  35. ^ "U.S. intel agencies still haven't ruled out lab accident origin for Covid". NBC News.
  36. ^ Koopmans, Marion; Daszak, Peter; Dedkov, Vladimir G.; Dwyer, Dominic E.; Farag, Elmoubasher; Fischer, Thea K.; Hayman, David T. S.; Leendertz, Fabian; Maeda, Ken; Nguyen-Viet, Hung; Watson, John (26 August 2021). "Origins of SARS-CoV-2: window is closing for key scientific studies". Nature. 596 (7873): 482–485. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02263-6. PMID 34433937. S2CID 237306971.
  37. ^ "How China's Response to the COVID-19 Lab Leak Theory Means It Will Rumble On and On". Time.
  38. ^ Callaway, Ewen (24 June 2021). "Deleted coronavirus genome sequences trigger scientific intrigue". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01731-3. PMID 34168363. S2CID 235634064.
  39. ^ Zimmer, Carl (23 June 2021). "Scientist Finds Early Virus Sequences That Had Been Mysteriously Deleted". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 25 June 2021.
  40. ^ Maggie Fox. "Scientist says early coronavirus samples were deleted from NIH database". CNN. Retrieved 25 June 2021.
  41. ^ Bollyky, Thomas J.; Huang, Yanzhong (15 August 2021). "The Right Way to Investigate the Origins of COVID-19". {{cite magazine}}: Cite magazine requires |magazine= (help)
  42. ^ a b "China punishes Australia for promoting an inquiry into covid-19". The Economist. 21 May 2020.
  43. ^ Yap, Chuin-Wei (10 February 2021). "China's Coal War With Australia Fuels Shortage at Home". Wall Street Journal – via www.wsj.com.
  44. ^ "China Warns of Retaliation Ahead of U.S. Report on Virus Origins". Bloomberg News. August 25, 2021. Retrieved August 25, 2021.
  45. ^ a b Ben Westcott, Isaac Yee and Yong Xiong. "Chinese government rejects WHO plan for second phase of Covid-19 origins study". CNN. Retrieved 23 July 2021.
  46. ^ Buckley, Chris (22 July 2021). "China denounces the W.H.O.'s call for another look at the Wuhan lab as 'shocking' and 'arrogant.'". The New York Times. Retrieved 23 July 2021.
  47. ^ "Covid: China rejects WHO plan for second phase of virus origin probe". BBC News. 23 July 2021. Retrieved 6 August 2021.
  48. ^ "Why many scientists say it's unlikely that SARS-CoV-2 originated from a 'lab leak'". www.science.org.