Draft:Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis'

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 97198 (talk | contribs) at 13:30, 26 April 2024 (Declining submission: nn - Submission is about a topic not yet shown to meet general notability guidelines (be more specific if possible) and context - Submission provides insufficient context (AFCH)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) encompasses various initiatives developed by the TRIPOD Group to alleviate the problems arising from inadequate reporting of Clinical prediction rules. It is part of the larger EQUATOR Network initiative to enhance the transparency and accuracy of reporting in research.

TRIPOD Statement

The main product of the TRIPOD Group is the TRIPOD Statement,.[1] which is an evidence-based, minimum set of recommendations for reporting Clinical prediction rules. It offers a standard way for authors to prepare reports of clinical prediction models, facilitating their complete and transparent reporting, reducing the influence of bias on their results, and aiding their critical appraisal and interpretation.

The TRIPOD "Explanation and Elaboration" document[2] explains and illustrates the principles underlying the TRIPOD Statement. It is strongly recommended that it be used in conjunction with the TRIPOD Statement.[1]

Considered an evolving document,[2] the TRIPOD Statement is subject to periodic changes as new evidence emerges; the most recent update was published in April 2024. The most recent version of the TRIPOD statement, now includes evidence-based recommendations for reporting prediction models that have been developing using artificial intelligence powered by machine learning methods ,[3]

Extensions

Extensions of the TRIPOD Statement have been developed to give additional guidance for prediction model studies that have accounted for clustering,[4]. Other TRIPOD guidance includes guidance for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical prediction models ,[5].

Similar initiatives to improve the reporting of other types of research have arisen after the introduction of CONSORT. They include: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE),[6] Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD),[7] Strengthening the Reporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA),[8] Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA),[9], Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE),[10] among others. These reporting guidelines have been incorporated into the EQUATOR Network initiative to enhance the transparent and accurate reporting of research studies.[11]. These reporting guidelines have been incorporated into the EQUATOR Network initiative to enhance the transparent and accurate reporting of research studies.[12]

References

  1. ^ a b Collins GS, Reitsma HB, Altman DG, Moons KGM. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:55-63
  2. ^ a b Moons KGM, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Ioannidis JPA, Macaskill P, Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Ransohoff DF, Collins GS. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015;:162: W1-W73
  3. ^ Collins GS, Moons KGM, Dhiman P, Riley RD, et al. TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ. 2024;385: e078378
  4. ^ Debray TP, Collins GS, Snell KIE, Van Calster B, Reitsma JB, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist. BMJ 2023; 380:e07018.
  5. ^ Snell KIE, Levis B, Damen JAA, Dhiman P, Moons KGM, Collins GS, Riley RD. Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA). BMJ 2023; 381:e073538.
  6. ^ Vandenbroucke JP. The making of STROBE. Epidemiology 2007;18: 797e9.
  7. ^ Knottnerus JA, Tugwell P. The standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:1118e27
  8. ^ Little J, Higgins JPT, Ioannidis JPA, Moher D, Gagnon F, Von Elm E, et al. STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA)-an extension of the STROBE Statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:597e608
  9. ^ Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche P, et al. and the PRISMA Group (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6: e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
  10. ^ Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, Ogrinc G, Mooney S, SQUIRE Development Group. Publication guidelines for improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE Project. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:670e6
  11. ^ Simera I, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz K, Hoey J. The EQUATOR Network: facilitating transparent and accurate reporting of health research. Serials 2008 Nov 21 (3): 183-87
  12. ^ Simera I, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz K, Hoey J. The EQUATOR Network: facilitating transparent and accurate reporting of health research. Serials 2008 Nov 21 (3): 183-87
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Transparent_Reporting_of_a_multivariable_prediction_model_for_Individual_Prognosis_Or_Diagnosis%27&oldid=1220875675"