Flying Machines Which Do Not Fly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk | contribs) at 20:06, 9 September 2023 (ce). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A 1903 New York Times article predicted that humanity could not create a working flying machine for another one to ten million years.

"Flying Machines Which Do Not Fly" is an editorial published in the New York Times on October 9, 1903. The article incorrectly predicted it would take one to ten million years for humanity to develop an operating flying machine.[1] The article was written in response to Samuel Langley's failed airplane experiment two days prior. 69 days after the article's publication, American brothers Orville and Wilbur Wright successfully achieved the first heavier-than-air flight on December 17, 1903, at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina.

Background

Main article: History of aviation

By the beginning of the twentieth century, popular opinion regarded air travel as impossible.[2][3] Prominent engineers and scientists too were pessimistic about flight. Notable critics included Simon Newcomb, Lord Kelvin, and chief engineer of the US Navy George W. Melville, the latter of whom described flying machines as "wholly unwarranted, if not absurd".[4] After five years of preparations, aviation pioneer Samuel Langley was ready to test out his Aerodrome on October 7, 1903. Piloted by Charles Manly, the aircraft failed to fly and dropped into the Potomac River immediately after launch.[4]

Article

First failure of Samuel Langley's manned Aerodrome, Potomac River, October 7, 1903.
Seconds into the Wright brothers' successful airplane flight, near Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, on December 17, 1903.

The failure of the Aerodrome resulted in public ridicule of Langley. Two days after the failed experiment, an editorial published in the New York Times opined:[5]

[It] might be assumed that the flying machine which will really fly might be evolved by the combined and continuous efforts of mathematicians and mechanicians in from one million to ten million years...No doubt the problem has attractions for those it interests, but to the ordinary man it would seem as if effort might be employed more profitably.

On the same day as the published article, Orville Wright wrote in his diary, "We started assembly today", in reference to the first airplane that he and his brother, Wilbur, would fly shortly thereafter.[6] On December 8, Langley made a final attempt to fly his Aerodrome. Once again, the experiment failed and official support for Langley's project was withdrawn. Another Times editorial commented:[7]

We hope that Professor Langley will not put his substantial greatness as a scientist in further peril by continuing to waste his time and money for further airship experiments. Life is short, and he is capable of services to humanity incomparably greater than can expected to result from trying to fly...

On December 17, the Wright brothers disproved the Times with the successful flight of their airplane.[5]

Legacy

Astronaut Dave Williams regards the article as "perhaps the most infamous bad prediction of all time"[8] and political scientist P.W. Singer notes the article as his favorite example of a "completely and utterly wrong" prediction.[9]

American President George W. Bush referenced the Times article during the centennial celebration of the Wright brothers' historic flight in December 2003.[10]

See also

References

  1. ^ LaMagdeleine, Izz Scott (May 12, 2023). "Did Wright Brothers Fly Same Year NYT Said Flying Machines Could Take 10M Years To Develop?". Snopes. Retrieved September 8, 2023.
  2. ^ Paris, Michael (1995). From the Wright Brothers to Top Gun: Aviation, Nationalism, and Popular Cinema. Manchester University Press. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-7190-4074-0.
  3. ^ Anslow, Louis (April 16, 2022). "In 1903, New York Times predicted that airplanes would take 10 million years to develop". Big Think. Retrieved September 8, 2023.
  4. ^ a b Hallion, Richard (May 8, 2003). Taking Flight: Inventing the Aerial Age, from Antiquity Through the First World War. Oxford University Press. pp. 152–153. ISBN 978-0-19-516035-2.
  5. ^ a b Firebaugh, Glenn (June 26, 2018). Seven Rules for Social Research. Princeton University Press. p. 27. ISBN 978-0-691-19043-3.
  6. ^ Gansler, Jacques S. (August 16, 2013). Democracy's Arsenal: Creating a Twenty-First-Century Defense Industry. MIT Press. p. 268. ISBN 978-0-262-52523-7.
  7. ^ Short, Simine (May 21, 2023). Flight Not Improbable: Octave Chanute and the Worldwide Race Toward Flight. Springer Nature. p. 195. ISBN 978-3-031-24430-8.
  8. ^ Williams, Dave; Elizabeth, Howell (2022). Why Am I Taller?: What Happens to an Astronaut's Body in Space. ECW Press. ISBN 978-1-77090-549-8.
  9. ^ Singer, Peter Warren (2009). Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the Twenty-first Century. Penguin. p. 9. ISBN 978-1-59420-198-1.
  10. ^ Sanger, David E. (December 18, 2003). "Wright Brothers Celebration Lacks a Key Element: Flight". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved September 8, 2023.

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flying_Machines_Which_Do_Not_Fly&oldid=1174641292"