Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirshenbaum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Scott Burley (talk) 05:41, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kirshenbaum

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy WP:GNG. Nardog (talk) 19:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 21:35, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 21:35, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found a whole rafts worth of references on GBooks. scope_creep^Talk 09:23, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Scope creep: Can you show us where they are? Nardog (talk) 14:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - - Steven Moran; Michael Cysouw (29 June 2018). The Unicode cookbook for linguists: Managing writing systems using orthography profiles. Language Science Press. p. 46. ISBN 978-3-96110-090-3. Retrieved 10 April 2019.
    - Jukka K. Korpela (21 June 2006). Unicode Explained. "O'Reilly Media, Inc.". p. 367. ISBN 978-0-596-10121-3. Retrieved 10 April 2019.
    - Jose Mira; José M. Ferrández; Jose-Ramon Alvarez Sanchez; Felix Paz; Javier Toledo (18 June 2009). Methods and Models in Artificial and Natural Computation. A Homage to Professor Mira's Scientific Legacy: Third International Work-Conference on the Interplay Between Natural and Artificial Computation, IWINAC 2009, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, June 22-26, 2009, Proceedings. Springer. p. 74. ISBN 978-3-642-02264-7. Retrieved 10 April 2019.
  Here is three. Maybe not a raft full. scope_creep^Talk 14:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Scope creep: Do you think that's significant coverage? Nardog (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per scope_creep. Also looks like I did some maintenance on it then got distracted a couple of weeks back.Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd forgotten about this, but it is very established as a term and a technology. It probably worth closing this Afd. scope_creep^Talk 20:57, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.