Niles and Sutherland Report: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Rv, the listed information still does NOT support the sentences referenced.
m detailed reference
Line 9: Line 9:


They reported that Van's Armenians (which they stated was approximately a quarter of the city's pre-war population) were all gone, that only 700 Armenians were left in the whole Van region, and they had to be protected by the soldiers from the vengeance of the Muslims. They reported that almost all of the Muslims were refugees who had escaped the invading Russians and Armenians, then returned when the Russians pulled back. Their report claimed immense death and destruction at the hands of Armenians, and stated that the Muslim sections of Van and [[Bitlis]] were completely demolished while the rest, mostly Armenian neighborhoods were mostly intact. In this, the Niles and Sutherland Report somewhat contradicts other reports, including that of the [[Harbord Commission|Harbord Report]] which generally found Armenian property in other areas to be in ruins.<ref>Harbord, James G., ''Report of the American Military Mission to Armenia'', (Government Printing Office, 1920), 8.</ref> and to eyewitness accounts of the actual destruction at Van <ref>Ussher, Clarence D. (1917). An American Physician in Turkey. Houghton Mifflin Company. http://books.google.com/books?id=QXtCAAAAIAAJ&client.</ref>. The report claimed that two thirds of the pre-war Muslim population was no longer in Van after the war and that there were no shops, no schools and no markets or warehouses left; only two hospitals were kept open by the efforts of the governor. Much of the city had to be rebuilt<ref>The Armenian Rebellion At Van", Justin McCarthy et.al., University of Utah Press, 2006, pp. 233-257</ref>.
They reported that Van's Armenians (which they stated was approximately a quarter of the city's pre-war population) were all gone, that only 700 Armenians were left in the whole Van region, and they had to be protected by the soldiers from the vengeance of the Muslims. They reported that almost all of the Muslims were refugees who had escaped the invading Russians and Armenians, then returned when the Russians pulled back. Their report claimed immense death and destruction at the hands of Armenians, and stated that the Muslim sections of Van and [[Bitlis]] were completely demolished while the rest, mostly Armenian neighborhoods were mostly intact. In this, the Niles and Sutherland Report somewhat contradicts other reports, including that of the [[Harbord Commission|Harbord Report]] which generally found Armenian property in other areas to be in ruins.<ref>Harbord, James G., ''Report of the American Military Mission to Armenia'', (Government Printing Office, 1920), 8.</ref> and to eyewitness accounts of the actual destruction at Van <ref>Ussher, Clarence D. (1917). An American Physician in Turkey. Houghton Mifflin Company. http://books.google.com/books?id=QXtCAAAAIAAJ&client.</ref>. The report claimed that two thirds of the pre-war Muslim population was no longer in Van after the war and that there were no shops, no schools and no markets or warehouses left; only two hospitals were kept open by the efforts of the governor. Much of the city had to be rebuilt<ref>The Armenian Rebellion At Van", Justin McCarthy et.al., University of Utah Press, 2006, pp. 233-257</ref>.

The observations reported by Niles and Sutherland was in great contrast to the reports received by the American public during the War. The Armenians and the Christian missionaries in the area friendly to them had so far only detailed the sufferings of the Armenians in the region<ref>"An American Physician in Turkey" by Clarence D. Ussher,Sterndale Classic titles, 2002, 118pp for example</ref><ref>"The Tragedy of Bitlis", Grace H. Knapp, 1919, pages 150-160, "Sequal", where the focus is solely on the efforts of various relief efforts for Armenians, conditions of the Armenian refugees, dying of disease and famine, while the equally severe conditions of the beaten and decimated Muslim populations get not one single mention</ref>.


A draft copy of this report was found among the documents of the Harbord Commission held in the [[Library of Congress]] <ref>"The Armenian Rebellion At Van", Justin McCarthy et.al., University of Utah Press, 2006, pp. 1-2</ref>, and it is believed to be the only surviving copy, and all other copies, including the originals of their interviews with locals, have been either lost or more likely destroyed. <ref>"The Armenian Rebellion At Van", Justin McCarthy et.al., University of Utah Press, 2006, pp. 2</ref>.
A draft copy of this report was found among the documents of the Harbord Commission held in the [[Library of Congress]] <ref>"The Armenian Rebellion At Van", Justin McCarthy et.al., University of Utah Press, 2006, pp. 1-2</ref>, and it is believed to be the only surviving copy, and all other copies, including the originals of their interviews with locals, have been either lost or more likely destroyed. <ref>"The Armenian Rebellion At Van", Justin McCarthy et.al., University of Utah Press, 2006, pp. 2</ref>.

Revision as of 18:15, 18 November 2009

The Niles and Sutherland Report[1] was a report commissioned by the United States Congress in 1919 to investigate conditions in the Ottoman Empire's eastern provinces in the aftermath of World War I, and to assess what sort of aid was needed and whether that aid could be provided by the American Committee for Relief in the Near East (Near East Relief). It was prepared by Captain Emory H. Niles of the United States Army and Arthur E. Sutherland Jr., and was based on their investigations at the city of Van and its vicinity[2].

Niles and Sutherland's inspection of Eastern Turkey was loosely coordinated with that of General James Harbord's larger and more expansive American Military Mission to Eastern Anatolia and Armenia which had been instructed to "investigate and report on the political, military, geographic, administrative, economic, and such other considerations involved in possible American interests and responsibilities in the region".[3] The Harbord Commission did not travel to Bitlis and Van, instead relying on information provided in Niles and Sutherland's report [4].

From Aleppo, Niles and Sutherland travelled by rail to Mardin, arriving there on 3 July 1919, where they engaged Osman Ruhi, a Turkish medical student, as their interpreter. The journey to Bitlis and Van was done on horseback, accompanied by a guard of Turkish soldiers. Their itinerary included Van, the Lake Region, Erzurum, Erzincan, Karakilise(modern Kars) and Şebinkarahisar. Because of difficulties in transportation, war damage, lack of roads, automobiles, gasoline, and sickness, they had to make changes in the trip plan occasionally. In some areas where they saw no real war damage, such as between Erzincan and Şebinkarahisar, or where ACRNE was already active, such as Trabizond, they did not spend much time.

Arriving by horseback at the city of Van in the summer of 1919, they were the first outsiders to see Van since the end of World War I. The two Americans estimated that there were maybe five thousand inhabitants in the city at the time, and close to one hundred thousand in the whole province.

They reported that Van's Armenians (which they stated was approximately a quarter of the city's pre-war population) were all gone, that only 700 Armenians were left in the whole Van region, and they had to be protected by the soldiers from the vengeance of the Muslims. They reported that almost all of the Muslims were refugees who had escaped the invading Russians and Armenians, then returned when the Russians pulled back. Their report claimed immense death and destruction at the hands of Armenians, and stated that the Muslim sections of Van and Bitlis were completely demolished while the rest, mostly Armenian neighborhoods were mostly intact. In this, the Niles and Sutherland Report somewhat contradicts other reports, including that of the Harbord Report which generally found Armenian property in other areas to be in ruins.[5] and to eyewitness accounts of the actual destruction at Van [6]. The report claimed that two thirds of the pre-war Muslim population was no longer in Van after the war and that there were no shops, no schools and no markets or warehouses left; only two hospitals were kept open by the efforts of the governor. Much of the city had to be rebuilt[7].

The observations reported by Niles and Sutherland was in great contrast to the reports received by the American public during the War. The Armenians and the Christian missionaries in the area friendly to them had so far only detailed the sufferings of the Armenians in the region[8][9].

A draft copy of this report was found among the documents of the Harbord Commission held in the Library of Congress [10], and it is believed to be the only surviving copy, and all other copies, including the originals of their interviews with locals, have been either lost or more likely destroyed. [11].

External links

References

  1. ^ U.S. National Archives, 184.021/175
  2. ^ "Niles and Sutherland Report", Justin McCarthy, Kongreye Sunulan Bildiriler: X1. Turk Tarih Kongresi, Ankara, 1990, pp. 1809-1853
  3. ^ Harbord, James G., Report of the American Military Mission to Armenia, (Government Printing Office, 1920), 3.
  4. ^ "All of the vilayets (provinces) of Turkish Armenia were visited except Van and Bitlis, which were inaccessible in the time available, but which have been covered by Captain Niles, an army officer who inspected them on horseback in August, and whose report corroborates the observations in the neighboring regions.35 (Footnote: Harbord in 184,02102/5, p. 2.)
  5. ^ Harbord, James G., Report of the American Military Mission to Armenia, (Government Printing Office, 1920), 8.
  6. ^ Ussher, Clarence D. (1917). An American Physician in Turkey. Houghton Mifflin Company. http://books.google.com/books?id=QXtCAAAAIAAJ&client.
  7. ^ The Armenian Rebellion At Van", Justin McCarthy et.al., University of Utah Press, 2006, pp. 233-257
  8. ^ "An American Physician in Turkey" by Clarence D. Ussher,Sterndale Classic titles, 2002, 118pp for example
  9. ^ "The Tragedy of Bitlis", Grace H. Knapp, 1919, pages 150-160, "Sequal", where the focus is solely on the efforts of various relief efforts for Armenians, conditions of the Armenian refugees, dying of disease and famine, while the equally severe conditions of the beaten and decimated Muslim populations get not one single mention
  10. ^ "The Armenian Rebellion At Van", Justin McCarthy et.al., University of Utah Press, 2006, pp. 1-2
  11. ^ "The Armenian Rebellion At Van", Justin McCarthy et.al., University of Utah Press, 2006, pp. 2
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Niles_and_Sutherland_Report&oldid=326576191"