User contributions for 109.76.131.91
For 109.76.131.91 talk block log logs filter log
22 April 2020
- 05:2305:23, 22 April 2020 diff hist +7 Popeye (film) Wikilink Stalag because I only half knew the joke from watching war films. (Alternatively instead of a link the text could be expanded to make it clearer, something like "Robins joked it was like a prison camp, calling it Stalag Altman")
- 05:1405:14, 22 April 2020 diff hist +25 Popeye (film) Intro should summarize not repeat Rotten Tomatoes
- 05:0805:08, 22 April 2020 diff hist +29 Popeye (film) MOS:SMALLFONT Avoid using smaller font sizes in elements that already use a smaller font size, such as infoboxes
- 04:5904:59, 22 April 2020 diff hist +81 Gomorrah (film) Needs reviews from actual critics. WP:MOSFILM Undid revision 952406777 by Vaselineeeeeeee (talk) Tag: Undo
- 04:2704:27, 22 April 2020 diff hist +679 Future Man (TV series) →Reception: Reviews. More would be better each season now has at least one review.
- 04:1704:17, 22 April 2020 diff hist +6 Glenne Headly WP:RELTIME Don't say "recently" say when, or leave it out.
- 03:1203:12, 22 April 2020 diff hist −2 Addicted to Love (film) Metacritic is published by CBS
- 03:0803:08, 22 April 2020 diff hist −40 The Orville While I'm at it I may as well remove another entirely unnecessary table heading. Totally redundant, there's a section heading immediately before it, not even some prose in between.
- 03:0603:06, 22 April 2020 diff hist −40 The Orville Must be embarrassing to fail to spell The Orville correctly, but there's simply no need for a table heading, or to include the show name in the heading.
- 02:5802:58, 22 April 2020 diff hist −1 Talk:Paul Feig Spel fix
- 02:2302:23, 22 April 2020 diff hist −17 Max Landis WP:STATUSQUO The focus of the section is exactly the same, the recently changed section heading is not an improvement, I'm merely restoring what was there up until recent changes. Undid revision 952406674 by Sro23 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 02:1802:18, 22 April 2020 diff hist +315 Talk:Max Landis →Sexual assault allegation
- 02:1002:10, 22 April 2020 diff hist −17 Max Landis Section heading is redundant and repetitive. Revert to "Controversy" (alternatively "Criticism" would work but that might be too neutral for some)
- 02:0602:06, 22 April 2020 diff hist +175 Better Call Saul WP:NAMEDREFS
- 02:0202:02, 22 April 2020 diff hist −11 Better Call Saul →Critical response: If it isn't "widespread" is it really critical acclaim? That's like being "very unique".
- 01:4501:45, 22 April 2020 diff hist +31 Idiocracy Improve references. author.
- 01:3301:33, 22 April 2020 diff hist +438 User talk:Aquillion →Sticks and Stones: new section
- 01:2501:25, 22 April 2020 diff hist −76 Sticks & Stones (2019 film) Audience response is still under discussion see talk page. Discuss on talk page if you want but I don't think that needs to be highlighted in the intro, it is only a small part of the article. WP:LEDE WP:UNDUE
- 01:1801:18, 22 April 2020 diff hist −149 Rise of the Guardians IMDB not a reliable source, also the film itself should the source of the cast, no references needed usually. Tag: references removed
- 01:1401:14, 22 April 2020 diff hist −52 The Legend of Billie Jean Best stick to primary genre only. Undid revision 950276576 by CejeroC (talk) Tag: Undo
- 00:3800:38, 22 April 2020 diff hist +257 City Slickers Copyedit.
- 00:2700:27, 22 April 2020 diff hist 0 Big Momma's House Undid revision 946913350 by 2607:FEA8:6000:D12:5C69:464D:7B9D:8D0F (talk) Tag: Undo
21 April 2020
- 23:4923:49, 21 April 2020 diff hist −3,265 Twin films Revert. You must be kidding. Discuss on talk page if you are actually being serious. Also you will need to show some sources where anyone other than you claims these films are twins, or even interesting coincidences. Undid revision 952383532 by Duc4Wikmedia (talk) Tag: Undo
- 23:4523:45, 21 April 2020 diff hist +727 Talk:Twin films →Flushed Away & Ratatouille ?
- 23:3223:32, 21 April 2020 diff hist +5 Sherlock Gnomes Critical response section needs reviews. A dead youtube link is useless, and archived version also useless, Better Reference needed.
- 23:2623:26, 21 April 2020 diff hist −1,520 Gnomeo & Juliet Details about the sequel best left to the article about the sequel. Sherlock Gnomes. Various fixes to correct out of date or irrelevant information. Tag: references removed
- 23:1723:17, 21 April 2020 diff hist +216 Big Momma's House 2 Improve Cinemascore reference.
- 23:1223:12, 21 April 2020 diff hist −822 Shark Tale Revert unexplained plot bloat by Special:Contributions/68.225.119.98. Please follow the WP:SIMPLE rules and explain your changes with an edit summary.
- 23:1023:10, 21 April 2020 diff hist +159 We Summon the Darkness Restore source comment to help editors who might want to WP:VERIFY because I know I thought it was weird that this had 8 named producers. (In most film articles you wouldn't have so many producers listed without incorrectly also including executive producers).
- 22:3922:39, 21 April 2020 diff hist +119 Gomorrah (film) Copyedit. Trueism. If it wasn't widespread it wouldn't really be critical acclaim. Like saying "very unique". Reception, needs to be expanded, a film with "widespread" critical acclaim should include some actual reviews from film critics, international and Italian critics too ideally.
- 21:5221:52, 21 April 2020 diff hist +563 Brightburn Sources
- 21:4021:40, 21 April 2020 diff hist +1,981 Future Man (TV series) →Reception: Season 3
- 21:1921:19, 21 April 2020 diff hist +43 Sharpe's Siege (TV programme) Better to reformat using Template:Interlanguage link so the non-English page doesn't come as a surprise.
- 19:4719:47, 21 April 2020 diff hist −80 Ma (2019 film) Copyedit intro/Revert. We cannot presume to know what audiences thought.
- 19:3919:39, 21 April 2020 diff hist −408 Twin films Revert. Overreaching, no real link between the films. Would need sources to prove otherwise.
- 19:0519:05, 21 April 2020 diff hist +478 Brightburn →Critical response: Special:Contributions/2804:D4B:62C4:900:9859:1281:A523:BA0C utterly failed to provide any sources when expanding the Critical reponse section. Why did everyone else fail to add any sources since then? More sources needed.
- 18:4618:46, 21 April 2020 diff hist +42 Brightburn →Plot: Long plot, over a thousand words.
- 15:5015:50, 21 April 2020 diff hist +531 Future Man (TV series) Rotten Tomatoes season 1, season 2, season 3. Will try to add reviews soon. Probably reviews from AV Club and Collider since they seem to be the only ones to consistently review all three seasons.
- 15:4315:43, 21 April 2020 diff hist +91 Future Man (TV series) Help:List.
- 15:1215:12, 21 April 2020 diff hist +78 Talk:List of films considered the worst →MOS:ANDOR
- 15:0615:06, 21 April 2020 diff hist −27 Howard the Duck (film) Undid revision 951514339 by 2A02:C7F:8EEB:3100:4948:BBD9:56AA:28D1 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 14:5514:55, 21 April 2020 diff hist +14 American Ultra Wikiquote
- 14:3514:35, 21 April 2020 diff hist +294 Doomsday (2008 film) →See also: Don't repeat films already listed in the Production section.
- 14:2514:25, 21 April 2020 diff hist −5 Doomsday (2008 film) Copyedit.
- 14:2414:24, 21 April 2020 diff hist −26 Stuber (film) Remove unnecessary '''Plot''' from Cast section. (was added by User:Ridwan97 as part of a larger edit to add the name Tedjo throughout the article, edit dated as of 08:01, 24 July 2019.)
- 05:0305:03, 21 April 2020 diff hist +73 Slap Her... She's French Archived copy is a bad citation title. Category:CS1_maint:_archived_copy_as_title
- 04:5404:54, 21 April 2020 diff hist +39 The Shiny Shrimps Rotten Tomatoes 73% 26 reviews.
- 04:5104:51, 21 April 2020 diff hist +100 Enough (film) Archived copy is a bad citation title. Fix error.
- 04:3604:36, 21 April 2020 diff hist −3 Doomsday (2008 film) Dead link. Fix.
24 July 2019
- 00:0100:01, 24 July 2019 diff hist +170 Talk:The Brothers Grimm (film) →Budget: $80 million budget (but millions more in other costs).
23 July 2019
- 23:5623:56, 23 July 2019 diff hist +73 The Brothers Grimm (film) Various sources put the budget at $80 million, see Talk page. Quote miss-attributed to Gilliam, USA Today source clearly says Damon. Variety.com redirects to wrong page, serves "Hot Picks" article instead of "Bellucci gigs. Change to page that matches the Cite title
- 23:4623:46, 23 July 2019 diff hist +111 Talk:The Brothers Grimm (film) →Budget
- 23:4123:41, 23 July 2019 diff hist +1,059 The Brothers Grimm (film) Cinemascore C. Rotten Tomatoes, state the site's consensus instead of badly paraphrasing it.
- 23:4023:40, 23 July 2019 diff hist +1,982 Talk:The Brothers Grimm (film) →Budget: new section
- 20:2120:21, 23 July 2019 diff hist −83 The Legend of Billie Jean →Reception: The absence of information is not worth mentioning. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:3613:36, 23 July 2019 diff hist −56 Stuber (film) Crawl not relevant unless larger context of Spider-Man also mentioned, see talk page.
- 13:1813:18, 23 July 2019 diff hist +22 Crawl (2019 film) Restore source. Not the usual WP:SYNTH in this case it is paraphrased from the source.
- 00:2500:25, 23 July 2019 diff hist −7 Kedi (2016 film) WP:MOSFILM Accolades.