User contributions for Puhlaa
A user with 1,902 edits. Account created on 10 December 2010.
29 January 2014
- 06:5506:55, 29 January 2014 diff hist +4,267 Talk:Chiropractic Puhlaa discusses recent edits by Alexbrn
- 06:5306:53, 29 January 2014 diff hist +456 Chiropractic Reverted controversial edits to the lede per WP:BRD - see talk page for concerns
- 06:5106:51, 29 January 2014 diff hist +296 Chiropractic Reverted controversial edits to "scope of practice" section - see talk page for concerns
- 06:4406:44, 29 January 2014 diff hist +2,502 Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: reply to QG
28 January 2014
- 16:4016:40, 28 January 2014 diff hist +233 User talk:Bon courage →Chiropractic edits: reply
- 16:3616:36, 28 January 2014 diff hist +474 User talk:Bon courage →Chiropractic edits: reply
- 16:2616:26, 28 January 2014 diff hist +1,746 User talk:Bon courage Controversial edits at chiropractic
26 January 2014
- 20:4420:44, 26 January 2014 diff hist +1,408 Talk:Chiropractic →Edit warning: comment
- 20:0820:08, 26 January 2014 diff hist +3,035 Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: reply to QG
- 02:1802:18, 26 January 2014 diff hist +234 m Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: ce
- 01:1001:10, 26 January 2014 diff hist +74 m Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: ce
25 January 2014
- 23:1123:11, 25 January 2014 diff hist +2,126 Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: reply to QG
24 January 2014
- 23:5623:56, 24 January 2014 diff hist +13 Joint cracking Undid revision 592248310 by 201.240.132.108 (talk) source provided clearly says "more than sixty years", not sure where 50 years comes from?
- 23:5223:52, 24 January 2014 diff hist −20 m Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: wording
- 22:1322:13, 24 January 2014 diff hist +219 m Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: wording
- 22:0322:03, 24 January 2014 diff hist +905 Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: reply to QG
- 05:1605:16, 24 January 2014 diff hist +82 m Talk:Chiropractic →Not pseudoscience: linked to source
- 03:0203:02, 24 January 2014 diff hist +275 m Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: wording
- 02:4202:42, 24 January 2014 diff hist +112 Talk:Chiropractic →Edit warning: thanks
- 02:3802:38, 24 January 2014 diff hist +1,841 Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: reply to QG
- 02:0802:08, 24 January 2014 diff hist +1,102 Talk:Chiropractic →Not pseudoscience: comment
23 January 2014
- 22:0622:06, 23 January 2014 diff hist +508 Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: reply
- 22:0222:02, 23 January 2014 diff hist −8 Chiropractic WHO guidelines are a much better source here
- 20:3120:31, 23 January 2014 diff hist +79 m Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: c/e
- 20:2820:28, 23 January 2014 diff hist +735 User talk:Bon courage notification
- 20:1920:19, 23 January 2014 diff hist +12 m Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: fixed link
- 20:1920:19, 23 January 2014 diff hist +712 Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: seems you have also removed some consensus edits
- 20:0920:09, 23 January 2014 diff hist −180 Chiropractic removed second, redundant reference to CAM that was just added to the first paragraph
- 20:0820:08, 23 January 2014 diff hist +652 Talk:Chiropractic →Massive deletion and manipulation of text throughout the article: comment - why add redundancy?
22 January 2014
- 04:3104:31, 22 January 2014 diff hist +606 Talk:Chiropractic →Proposal for new wording: comment/proposal
21 January 2014
- 21:2821:28, 21 January 2014 diff hist +1,121 User talk:Valjean →Controversy at Chiropractic again: any more advice?
- 04:0604:06, 21 January 2014 diff hist +196 User talk:Valjean →Controversy at Chiropractic again: thanks
- 03:3103:31, 21 January 2014 diff hist +232 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →Comment from accused editor: understood
- 03:1503:15, 21 January 2014 diff hist +261 User talk:Valjean →Controversy at Chiropractic again: reply and note that I mentioned you at 3RR noticeboard
- 03:1303:13, 21 January 2014 diff hist +666 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →Comment from accused editor: comment about canvassing accusation
20 January 2014
- 23:5623:56, 20 January 2014 diff hist +3,534 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Puhlaa reported by User:Roxy the dog (Result: ): Comment from the accused
- 20:5820:58, 20 January 2014 diff hist +796 User talk:Zad68 Chiropractic - changes to the text that you helped to form consensus for
- 20:5420:54, 20 January 2014 diff hist +1 m Talk:Chiropractic →Removal of verified fact that chiropractic is a profession: indent
- 20:5420:54, 20 January 2014 diff hist +425 Talk:Chiropractic →Removal of verified fact that chiropractic is a profession: reply
- 20:4620:46, 20 January 2014 diff hist +908 User talk:Puhlaa →January 2014: reply - I dont think you understand WP:BRD Roxy
- 20:3920:39, 20 January 2014 diff hist +661 User talk:Valjean Controversy at Chiropractic again
- 20:3520:35, 20 January 2014 diff hist +2,838 Talk:Chiropractic →Removal of verified fact that chiropractic is a profession: Providing WP:V for consensus version and linking (again) to previous discussion which achieved consensus
- 18:5718:57, 20 January 2014 diff hist +34 Chiropractic Undid revision 591590406 by Roxy the dog (talk) Restoring consensus version - do John and Roxy not agree that discussion should proceed removal of consensus and verified text from the lede?
- 18:5418:54, 20 January 2014 diff hist +893 Talk:Chiropractic →Removal of verified fact that chiropractic is a profession: question for John and Roxy
- 17:3317:33, 20 January 2014 diff hist +34 Chiropractic Undid revision 591584419 by John Snow II (talk) Reverted edit against consensus again - see talk page - need to discuss controversial changes that are against consensus
- 17:3217:32, 20 January 2014 diff hist +795 Talk:Chiropractic →Removal of verified fact that chiropractic is a profession: read the previous discussion, then come with sources or new ideas...your POV is not enough
- 16:0316:03, 20 January 2014 diff hist +990 Talk:Chiropractic Reminder of previous consensus and verified fact that chiropractic is a profession
- 15:5015:50, 20 January 2014 diff hist +34 Chiropractic Undid revision 591549311 by Roxy the dog (talk) It is a profession - but consensus was to include 'approach' - see talk
17 January 2014
- 17:3917:39, 17 January 2014 diff hist +34 Chiropractic Undid revision 591117854 by John Snow II (talk) It is a profession as well as an approach - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chiropractic/Archive_36#Recent_controversial_edits_-_profe
25 December 2013
- 20:5320:53, 25 December 2013 diff hist +2,117 Talk:Vertebral artery dissection →Here we go again: reply to BR - If consensus is to specify the most notable proponents/users it's ok, but lets find a less repetitive way to do it
