Talk:2017 Venezuelan constitutional crisis: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:48, 31 March 2017

Military history: South America Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	South American military history task force

Venezuela Stub‑class

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article title

The opposition may call it a "self-coup", but is it neutral phrasing? Only an opinion piece is referenced in the article. I think it should be described simply as a court ruling. Everyking (talk) 06:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Something similar to the 1992 Peruvian constitutional crisis maybe?--ZiaLater (talk) 07:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {{WikiProject Venezuela|class=stub|b1=n|b2=n|b3=n|b4=y|b5=n|importance=}}
+==Article title==
 The opposition may call it a "self-coup", but is it neutral phrasing? Only an opinion piece is referenced in the article. I think it should be described simply as a court ruling. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] ([[User talk:Everyking|talk]]) 06:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
+:Something similar to the [[1992 Peruvian constitutional crisis]] maybe?--[[User:ZiaLater|<span style="text-shadow:#C0C0C0 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em"><span style="color: ForestGreen">''ZiaLater''</span>]] ([[User talk:ZiaLater|<span style="color: ForestGreen">talk</span></span>]]) 07:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)