Talk:AN/PRC-77 Portable Transceiver: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:21, 3 May 2008

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AN/PRC-77 Portable Transceiver article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / North America / United States B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Radio Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Vacuum tubes?

I'm pretty sure the PRC-25 used a tube in the final amp, whereas the 841 used transistors. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 21:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is correct no RT-841 had tubes, the RT-505 (in manpack config is AN/PRC-25) had the tube-type amplifier. The last sentence is incorrect in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TroyF67 (talk • contribs).

Yes- 505. That model was before my time. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 09:41, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Australia

"The 77 set is also used by the Australian Army Cadets and the Australian Air Force Cadets. The Australian Army does not use the 77 anymore; it has now been superseded by the RAVEN series."

I don't know the official status, but 5/7 RAR still has a lot of PRC-77s that they use, and also, I wonder why the cadets were mentioned? Cadet Units aren't issued with PRC-77s in my experience, but borrow them from Army units when they're willing.

US Centric

From the article:

Today it has largely been replaced by SINCGARS radios

I'd like to see a cite for that, and I know of many exceptions. In fact many NATO countries have had their own digital radio projects such as the British Bowman (communications system). This looks like a US centric view. --21:31, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Operators

Finland is one operator, there is mention in pic but not in Operators chapter. here is link to it:

http://www.mil.fi/maavoimat/kalustoesittely/index.dsp?level=80&equipment=133

they also have digital version 217M. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuju (talk • contribs) 10:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== Source that says that Norway use it? ==

It says that only elite or prioritized Norwegian units use the MRR, and the others use the older POS. Is there any source that backs this up, or is it mere speculation? 212.17.141.54 (talk) 21:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 21:02, 3 May 2008 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,546,196 edits m Signing comment by 212.17.141.54 - "" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:21, 3 May 2008 edit undo 212.17.141.54 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 47:		Line 47:
	== Source that says that Norway use it? ==		== Source that says that Norway use it? ==

	It says that only elite or prioritized Norwegian units use the MRR, and the others use the older POS. Is there any source that backs this up, or is it mere speculation? ~~<small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by~~ [[Special:Contributions/212.17.141.54\|212.17.141.54]] ([[User talk:212.17.141.54\|talk]]) 21:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)~~</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->~~		It says that only elite or prioritized Norwegian units use the MRR, and the others use the older POS. Is there any source that backs this up, or is it mere speculation? [[Special:Contributions/212.17.141.54\|212.17.141.54]] ([[User talk:212.17.141.54\|talk]]) 21:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)