Talk:Antigentilism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:42, 22 April 2012

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antigentilism redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Psychology NA‑class

	Psychology portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
NA	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Discrimination NA‑class

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
NA	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Farse

This article is a pure farse. I think one could hardly find a single more biased article in the whole wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.12.91.242 (talk) 11:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Propaganda

"Antigentilism is a form of xenophobia which may occur as one response to long Jewish experience of Gentile antisemitism."

This is a false statement and is not verifiable. How do you verify that "antigentilism" only arises as a direct response to "antisemitism"? Following the same logic, one could assert that antisemitism arises in response to Jewish ethnocentrism. There may be some truth to both assertions but it's far more complicated and multi-dimensional than that.

"Some white nationalists[13] have discerned Anti-Christian sentiment in the Talmud."

Another false statement. Emphasising the term "white nationalist" implies that these criticisms arise solely from the white-nationalist community, which is patently false, since Louis Farrakhan was not a white nationalist, last I checked. It also insinuates a racist origin for such criticisms (how can it be racist to merely perceive anti-christian sentiment in a book)?

Anyway, nice propaganda and all, but this article needs more balance.