User talk:AnAimlessRoad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Hello, AnAimlessRoad! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!   — Jess· Δ 01:41, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

April 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Holocaust denial are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:48, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 01:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Eustace Mullins, you may be blocked from editing. Jayjg (talk) 01:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shrike (talk) 06:28, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you continue with the behavior on USS Liberty incident ‎, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

Edits such as this [1] are not acceptable as they go against WP:NPOV--Shrike (talk) 14:03, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

I see you have already been advised to stop treating Wikipedia as a forum for general discussion, but I'll reiterate. This edit[2], which contains not an iota of actionable information or evidence, amounts to using Wikipedia as a platform for the promotion of your fringe theories on the subject. The suggestion that other editors are getting paid for their work is an inflammatory accusation of bad faith. The use of religious slurs and propensity for attempting to "out" another editor's religious affiliation is similarly inappropriate.[3] I would direct you to read WP:ASG and WP:CIVIL, but given your familiarity with Wikipedia shorthand, I have a feeling you already know this stuff. I suggest you stop.Homunculus (duihua) 14:12, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Arbitration Enfocement[edit]

A request has been filed against you here[4]. —Zujine|talk 21:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Talk:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion ‎. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Dougweller (talk) 17:06, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Complete lack of effort to even attempt to conform to community standards, especially lack of civility and using talkpages as a forum despite repeated warnings. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 23:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Note: although I made this block in response to an AE report here, this block is explicitly not an AE block, and may be reviewed by another admin as a standard block. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 23:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)