Talk:Parag Khanna: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 7: Line 7:
== NPOV/Advert issues ==
== NPOV/Advert issues ==


Please note 6/2/2013 edits by username "Paragkhanna." See also problematic text including: "A widely cited global intellectual." Without citation. I think it would be beneficial to work in a discussion of his book reviews, which are the most thoughtful and least biased discussion of Mr. Khanna and his work. Despite all of his service, unfortunately for him, the reviews I have read are generally unfavorable. Two have already been cited in the article. Morozov and Drezner's reviews are helpful.--[[User:Jp07|Jp07]] ([[User talk:Jp07|talk]]) 18:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Please note 6/2/2013 edits by username "Paragkhanna." See also lots of problematic text including: "A widely cited global intellectual." Without citation. I think it would be beneficial to work in a discussion of his book reviews, which are the most thoughtful and least biased discussion of Mr. Khanna and his work. Despite all of his service, unfortunately for him, the reviews I have read are generally unfavorable. Two have already been cited in the article. Morozov and Drezner's reviews are helpful.--[[User:Jp07|Jp07]] ([[User talk:Jp07|talk]]) 18:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:34, 3 June 2016

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

NPOV/Advert issues

Please note 6/2/2013 edits by username "Paragkhanna." See also lots of problematic text including: "A widely cited global intellectual." Without citation. I think it would be beneficial to work in a discussion of his book reviews, which are the most thoughtful and least biased discussion of Mr. Khanna and his work. Despite all of his service, unfortunately for him, the reviews I have read are generally unfavorable. Two have already been cited in the article. Morozov and Drezner's reviews are helpful.--Jp07 (talk) 18:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]