Talk:Post Carbon Institute

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 99.109.126.73 (talk) at 22:58, 10 November 2011 (http://www.scribd.com/doc/65968040/CULTURE-AND-BEHAVIOR-Dangerously-Addictive-Why-We-Are-Biologically-Ill-Suited-to-the-Riches-of-Modern-America ... http://www.postcarbon.org/Reader/PCReader-Whybrow-Addictive.pdf). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconUnited States Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Why were the author of their book removed?

Why was the list of authors added? One or two, maybe, but not four (with one fake link). — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:54, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What is fake about https://www.worldcat.org/title/post-carbon-reader-managing-the-21st-centurys-sustainability-crises/oclc/681376694?referer=list_view ? 99.119.128.169 (talk) 01:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
One of the Wikilinks is an WP:EGG. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No reason to be vague, which one are you suggesting? 99.181.131.7 (talk) 04:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If if was Will_Allen_(urban_farmer)#Urban_farming for Erika Allen, it appears to have been removed in the IP User's attempt to compromise, Art. So what is the issue? 97.87.29.188 (talk) 01:31, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
True since October 29th: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Post_Carbon_Institute&diff=457909320&oldid=455813624 99.181.135.155 (talk) 04:34, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's still questionable, as a tangential reference, but (if you would actually verify Whybrow's contribution), it's not actively harmful. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 11:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See http://www.postcarbon.org/Reader/PCReader-Whybrow-Addictive.pdf
from http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x628778 on Democratic Underground
Also see http://www.scribd.com/doc/65968040/CULTURE-AND-BEHAVIOR-Dangerously-Addictive-Why-We-Are-Biologically-Ill-Suited-to-the-Riches-of-Modern-America
99.109.126.73 (talk) 22:58, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]