Talk:Samsun Golf Course: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
* Several golf courses in Singapore are on reclaimed land, including the [[Marina Bay, Singapore|Marina Bay]] course and the courses next to [[Singapore Changi Airport|Changi Airport]]
* Several golf courses in Singapore are on reclaimed land, including the [[Marina Bay, Singapore|Marina Bay]] course and the courses next to [[Singapore Changi Airport|Changi Airport]]
[[User:Eckaslike|Eckaslike]] ([[User talk:Eckaslike|talk]]) 15:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
[[User:Eckaslike|Eckaslike]] ([[User talk:Eckaslike|talk]]) 15:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

I agree. And it's not cited by anything. Fake news. [[Special:Contributions/96.57.1.171|96.57.1.171]] ([[User talk:96.57.1.171|talk]]) 19:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:43, 24 July 2017

WikiProject iconTurkey Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGolf Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

First golf course on reclaimed land?

The claim that this course is the first in the world on land reclaimed from the sea is surely preposterous. (The claim was featured in "Did you know?" on the main page on 24 July.) Counter-examples:

Eckaslike (talk) 15:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. And it's not cited by anything. Fake news. 96.57.1.171 (talk) 19:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]