Talk:Very important person: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate; result was Keep (non-admin closure)
afd not over yet
Line 1: Line 1:
{{oldafdmulti|date=2006-12-28|page=Very Important Person|result='''Keep'''|
{{oldafdfull|date=2006-12-28|page=Very Important Person|result='''Keep'''}}
date2=2009-02-19 | result2 = '''Keep''' | page2 = Very Important Person (2nd nomination) | small = yes | collapse = no | numbered = yes
}}


== 2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message ==
== 2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message ==

Revision as of 00:10, 20 February 2009

2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 13:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IRRITATING WORD

This is against the basic principle of equality, so it cannot be accepted by free and democratic countries. Val — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.55.182.251 (talkcontribs)

VIP can also be an important criminal witness especially under witness protection programs although cases of having an important criminal witness as a VIP is rare. Mail J. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.234.119 (talk) 10:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

derivation? origin?

Very Important seems so low-brow. Was VIP maybe originally a latin phrase? Inquiring minds want to know. Kingturtle (talk) 18:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]