Talk:William Nordhaus: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 30: Line 30:
::Incomplete without whole thread, and not up-to [[Wikipedia:Encyclopedic]] standards if left-out. [[Special:Contributions/99.181.148.240|99.181.148.240]] ([[User talk:99.181.148.240|talk]]) 04:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
::Incomplete without whole thread, and not up-to [[Wikipedia:Encyclopedic]] standards if left-out. [[Special:Contributions/99.181.148.240|99.181.148.240]] ([[User talk:99.181.148.240|talk]]) 04:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
:::??? — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 08:13, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
:::??? — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 08:13, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

== Nordhaus item in 2012 to include ==

{{Quotation|'''The Wall Street Journal of January 27, 2012 response'''

An opinion piece in the January 27, 2012 Wall Street Journal<ref>[[Claude Allègre]] et al., “ No Need to Panic About Global Warming,” The [[Wall Street Journal]], January 27, 2012; “ Concerned Scientists Reply on Global Warming” </ref>
made a number of attacks on the science and credibility of the case for global warming, including quoting Nordhaus' research to argue that economics does not support policies to slow climate change in the next half-century.

Nordhaus rebutted their contentions point-by-point in an article <ref>[http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/mar/22/why-global-warming-skeptics-are-wrong/ Why the Global Warming Skeptics Are Wrong] March 22, 2012 by Nordhaus regarding [[climate change denial]]</ref>, drawing analogy with the well-documented use of PR by the Tobacco industry faced with financially disastrous scientific findings, to manufacture doubt, rather than by to establish the facts. He quotes their stated aim of fostering confusion
“Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the ‘body of fact’ that exists in the mind of the general public.”

Three signatories of the original piece [[Richard Lindzen]], [[William Happer]] and an ex-[[ExxonMobil]] manager of Strategic Planning & Programs Roger W. Cohen responded to Nordhaus' comments, and Nordhaus replied to the three's response.<ref>[http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/apr/26/climate-casino-exchange/ In the Climate Casino: An Exchange] in April 26, 2012 [[New York Review of Books]]</ref>.}}
[[Special:Contributions/99.181.150.169|99.181.150.169]] ([[User talk:99.181.150.169|talk]]) 02:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:15, 10 June 2012

WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
WikiProject iconEconomics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEnergy Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

``social cost of carbon`` relates to Effects of climate change on humans

Add link. 166.252.201.27 (talk) 19:41, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Explain. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nybooks.com resource october 27, 2011 Vol. LVIII, Number 16 page 29-31.

Energy: Friend or Enemy?

  • The End of Energy: The Unmaking of America’s Environment, Security, and Independence by Michael J. Graetz; MIT Press, 369 pp., $29.95
  • Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use, a report by the National Research Council’s Committee on Health, Environmental, and Other External Costs and Benefits of Energy Production and Consumption; National Academies Press, 506 pp., $47.00 (paper), available for free at www.nap.edu

97.87.29.188 (talk) 23:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added the latter to Talk:United States National Research Council, but not sure about the Graetz book yet. 99.190.82.204 (talk) 03:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nordhaus and the WSJ "16" ... example.

99.181.133.170 (talk) 07:36, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The followup is unnecessary and inappropriate in this, or possibly any, article. I'm not sure the "review" is necessary or appropriate in the article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:40, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Incomplete without whole thread, and not up-to Wikipedia:Encyclopedic standards if left-out. 99.181.148.240 (talk) 04:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
??? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:13, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nordhaus item in 2012 to include

The Wall Street Journal of January 27, 2012 response

An opinion piece in the January 27, 2012 Wall Street Journal[1]

made a number of attacks on the science and credibility of the case for global warming, including quoting Nordhaus' research to argue that economics does not support policies to slow climate change in the next half-century.

Nordhaus rebutted their contentions point-by-point in an article [2], drawing analogy with the well-documented use of PR by the Tobacco industry faced with financially disastrous scientific findings, to manufacture doubt, rather than by to establish the facts. He quotes their stated aim of fostering confusion

“Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the ‘body of fact’ that exists in the mind of the general public.”


Three signatories of the original piece Richard Lindzen, William Happer and an ex-ExxonMobil manager of Strategic Planning & Programs Roger W. Cohen responded to Nordhaus' comments, and Nordhaus replied to the three's response.[3].

99.181.150.169 (talk) 02:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Claude Allègre et al., “ No Need to Panic About Global Warming,” The Wall Street Journal, January 27, 2012; “ Concerned Scientists Reply on Global Warming”
  2. ^ Why the Global Warming Skeptics Are Wrong March 22, 2012 by Nordhaus regarding climate change denial
  3. ^ In the Climate Casino: An Exchange in April 26, 2012 New York Review of Books
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:William_Nordhaus&oldid=496837247"