Talk:Huaiwen Xu: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Instantnood (talk | contribs)
32,683 edits
mNo edit summary
Instantnood (talk | contribs)
32,683 edits
→‎Survey: Oppose
Line 5: Line 5:
}}
}}
<!-- {{move|Xu Huaiwen}} -->
<!-- {{move|Xu Huaiwen}} -->
This page has been moved back and forth between Xu Huaiwen and Huaiwen Xu. Quote from [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Names]]: " ''Another special case is for a figure whose Chinese name is familar but used English ordering (for example, [[Wen Ho Lee]]). In this case, the primary entry should be under the English ordering with a redirect from the Chinese ordering. ''". Other similar examples include [[Chen-Ning Yang]], [[Ang Lee]] and [[Tsung-Dao Lee]]. &mdash; [[User:Instantnood|Insta]][[User_talk:Instantnood|ntnood]] 20:00, September 12, 2005 (UTC) (modified 16:16, 15 September 2005 (UTC))
<cite id=Naming_conventions> </cite> This page has been moved back and forth between Xu Huaiwen and Huaiwen Xu. Quote from [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Names]]: " ''Another special case is for a figure whose Chinese name is familar but used English ordering (for example, [[Wen Ho Lee]]). In this case, the primary entry should be under the English ordering with a redirect from the Chinese ordering. ''". Other similar examples include [[Chen-Ning Yang]], [[Ang Lee]] and [[Tsung-Dao Lee]]. &mdash; [[User:Instantnood|Insta]][[User_talk:Instantnood|ntnood]] 20:00, September 12, 2005 (UTC) (modified 16:16, 15 September 2005 (UTC))
:So far [[user:Huaiwei]] has not produced any valid justification why the title of this article should be Xu Huaiwen not Huaiwen Xu (see edit history [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huaiwen_Xu&action=history&limit=14&dir=prev&offset=20050716180700] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Xu_Huaiwen&action=history&limit=16&dir=prev&offset=20050716180700]), that this article is different from the other examples mentioned above. Even worse, it was a cut and paste move. &mdash; [[User:Instantnood|Insta]][[User_talk:Instantnood|ntnood]] 16:16, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
:So far [[user:Huaiwei]] has not produced any valid justification why the title of this article should be Xu Huaiwen not Huaiwen Xu (see edit history [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huaiwen_Xu&action=history&limit=14&dir=prev&offset=20050716180700] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Xu_Huaiwen&action=history&limit=16&dir=prev&offset=20050716180700]), that this article is different from the other examples mentioned above. Even worse, it was a cut and paste move. &mdash; [[User:Instantnood|Insta]][[User_talk:Instantnood|ntnood]] 16:16, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
::Quite on the contrary, there has been plenty of discussion on this matter. Your habit of bringing content discussions to individual user talkpages, and in utilising only edit summaries instead of talkpages helped bury these discussions within the deep realms of wikispace, thus legitimising your attempt to slander the name of those whom you disagree with. I do not think this persistently dishonest behavior should go unnoticed.--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 11:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
::Quite on the contrary, there has been plenty of discussion on this matter. Your habit of bringing content discussions to individual user talkpages, and in utilising only edit summaries instead of talkpages helped bury these discussions within the deep realms of wikispace, thus legitimising your attempt to slander the name of those whom you disagree with. I do not think this persistently dishonest behavior should go unnoticed.--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 11:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Line 22: Line 22:
===Survey===
===Survey===
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>
*'''Oppose'''. See [[#Naming_conventions|above]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Huaiwen_Xu&oldid=23117164]. ~~~~
*
*
*
*
Line 28: Line 29:
*
*
*
*
--><!--
Don't forget to nominate it on WP:RM#Current_proposals. Do remember to read the introduction and instructions there. Thanks.
-->
-->

Revision as of 20:09, 19 September 2006

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This page has been moved back and forth between Xu Huaiwen and Huaiwen Xu. Quote from Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Names: " Another special case is for a figure whose Chinese name is familar but used English ordering (for example, Wen Ho Lee). In this case, the primary entry should be under the English ordering with a redirect from the Chinese ordering. ". Other similar examples include Chen-Ning Yang, Ang Lee and Tsung-Dao Lee. — Instantnood 20:00, September 12, 2005 (UTC) (modified 16:16, 15 September 2005 (UTC))[reply]

So far user:Huaiwei has not produced any valid justification why the title of this article should be Xu Huaiwen not Huaiwen Xu (see edit history [1] [2]), that this article is different from the other examples mentioned above. Even worse, it was a cut and paste move. — Instantnood 16:16, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Quite on the contrary, there has been plenty of discussion on this matter. Your habit of bringing content discussions to individual user talkpages, and in utilising only edit summaries instead of talkpages helped bury these discussions within the deep realms of wikispace, thus legitimising your attempt to slander the name of those whom you disagree with. I do not think this persistently dishonest behavior should go unnoticed.--Huaiwei 11:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Did I ever say that there's not plenty of discussion on this matter? Quote me if I had ever say such thing on this matter. Don't put your words in my mouth. That's not what civilised wikipedians should have done.

Meanwhile, please stop moving the entry by cut-and-paste. Nominate it at WP:RM if you are genuinely serious to editing on Wikipedia. Stop creating any more trouble, please. If the proposal to move it from Huaiwen Xu to Xu Huaiwen is passed administrators will delete the redirect at Xu Huaiwen and move this entry there. — Instantnood 07:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History merge

I merged the cut and paste move's history into this article. However, be warned that if there are future revert wars going on for the content dispute/naming I'll definitely protect both names. --WinHunter (talk) 06:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for taking action against it. Nevertheless I don't think it'd be a good way to merge an entry with its cut-and-paste fork. The edit history is now like a mess.. Nobody can now tell which edit was made under which title, and who made which edit under which title. Is there any better alternative way that we can preserved edit history in a neat and tidy manner? — Instantnood 07:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Protected

This page is protected because of recent edit-warring in here. Please discuss the matter and come up with a concensus rather than reverting each other. Many thnaks. --WinHunter (talk) 09:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Huaiwen_Xu&oldid=76647585"