Template talk:Afd-merge to: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:52, 26 February 2009

Very difficult to use

I have to say, this template is really hard to use, and I don't see myself using this template again. I much prefer mergeto. Not only is it less instrusive to the main articlespace (this infobox is a real monster!), but it's incredibly hard to use when you consider that the main users of this template have to plough through tonnes of AfD closures. The only possible way this template could be used is through a user script, but even then, there's too much information that needs to be pasted. --Deathphoenix ʕ 21:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion continued at Template talk:Afd-mergefrom.

Added a category parameter to supress cats.

Rich Farmbrough, 18:50 20 January 2007 (GMT).

"If the merger is not completed promptly, this article might be re-nominated for deletion."

Shouldn't this sentence be removed, given that

There is no deadline.
A page that should be merged should not be re-nominated for deletion...because it should just be merged. 160.39.213.152 (talk) 01:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ==Added a category parameter to supress cats. ==
 ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 18:50 [[20  January]] [[2007]] (GMT).
+== "If the merger is not completed promptly, this article might be re-nominated for deletion." ==
+Shouldn't this sentence be removed, given that
+#There is no deadline.
+#A page that should be merged should not be re-nominated for deletion...because it should just be merged. [[Special:Contributions/160.39.213.152|160.39.213.152]] ([[User talk:160.39.213.152|talk]]) 01:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)