User talk:Decltype: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:50, 6 February 2010

This administrator has volunteered for an administrator review. You may comment on his or her administrative actions at Wikipedia:Administrator review/Decltype.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

Re: Removal of warnings

Hello, Decltype. You have new messages at Jamesofur's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you!

Thanks for your help with article deletion issue. :) I appreciate your assistance and guidance.

Bernie

WikiProject Films January 2010 Newsletter

The January 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Watcom Assembler

Hi, Decltype. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JWASM, a discussion in which you participated, was closed as redirect to Open Watcom Assembler. Open Watcom Assembler has now been nominated for deletion due to notability concerns. If you would like to participate in the discussion, please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Watcom Assembler. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:16, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification. Will see if I can bring something constructive to the debate. decltype (talk) 09:22, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Polhøgda

FYI. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification. The article is neat, which is unsurprising, considering the fact that two of the most prolific Norwegian content contributors worked on it. decltype (talk) 22:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After I posted a note here I noticed there is quite a lot of Norwegian content work going on. good to see. Take care. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is indeed a small group of very dedicated and thorough editors who write about Norwegian topics. We're a small country, but I feel that we're well-represented on en.wp. decltype (talk) 23:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re printf, oops. ps I added a comment to the end too.

By the way, I got there via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_commands#List

printf Shell programming Write formatted output 4.3BSD-Reno

which sent me to

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Printf_(Unix)&action=edit&redlink=1

Before creating an article, please read Wikipedia:Your first article. ...

What could you do to help send this to a better place??

Thanks for your efforts.

Dennis —Preceding unsigned comment added by DGerman (talk • contribs) 01:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replying at your talk. decltype (talk) 07:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hey decltype, hur mar du? I hope you can help me with something. I'm trying to fix Second Unitarian Church (Brooklyn, New York), which is a terrible mess, without deleting too much. One of the problems is the images: they have names like untitled1.jpg, and I don't think I can rename them (that is, there's no "Move" button under my Twinkle pull-down). Can you do something there, with your unlimited administrative powers? Maybe a quick renaming based on the content of the images, as best as you can judge? Anything better than those names! Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, will take a look. decltype (talk) 17:27, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the "untitled" from the image titles, and attempted to correct their license tags. File:The entrance to the Second Unitarian Church in Brooklyn.png seems to be a copyrighted image unlikely to meet WP:NFCC so I tagged it for deletion. decltype (talk) 17:39, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thank you so much! I'm always a bit at a loss with those files, and know little about licenses. It is correct that you could do this 'cause you're an admin, right? Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, admins recently got the ability to move files. Regards, decltype (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re:Speedy deletion declined: Al Chaek

Hello, decltype. Thank you for the notification. I hit the wrong parameter when I added the template to the totally unsourced article with questionable notability. I thought I could click every buttons pertinent to the article's poor status quo. That was my first time tagging the template with the Twinkle tool. Anyway, I googled the person's name before the tagging, but all I could see was an entry at IMDb, so the article both fails its notability and WP:V regardless of the claim appeared on the article. So well, I still think that the article should be deleted, but you may have other opinions. Regards.--Caspian blue 20:49, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 74: / Line 74: @@
 :::Hey, thank you so much! I'm always a bit at a loss with those files, and know little about licenses. It is correct that you could do this 'cause you're an admin, right? Thanks, [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 19:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 ::::Yes, admins recently got the ability to move files. Regards, <tt>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</tt> ([[User talk:Decltype|talk]]) 19:09, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
+== re:Speedy deletion declined: Al Chaek ==
+Hello, decltype. Thank you for the notification. I hit the wrong parameter when I added the template to the totally unsourced article with questionable notability. I thought I could click every buttons pertinent to the article's poor status quo. That was my first time tagging the template with the Twinkle tool. Anyway, I googled the person's name before the tagging, but all I could see was an entry at [[IMDb]], so the article both fails its notability and [[WP:V]] regardless of the claim appeared on the article. So well, I still think that the article should be deleted, but you may have other opinions. Regards.--[[User talk:Caspian blue|'''Caspian''' blue]] 20:49, 6 February 2010 (UTC)