User talk:Here come the Suns

Discretionary sanctions alerts, please read

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 11:11, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Nothing wrong with your edits here, but need to make sure you're aware of the restrictions too. Thanks. – bradv🍁 21:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

repeating links is ok in some circumstances

Read what the policy says but if helpful for readers, a link may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, hatnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead --SharabSalam (talk) 00:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

and also read MOS:TERRORIST--SharabSalam (talk) 00:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

I think you should read it. There's nothing there that prevents using a category that says an organization was designated as a terrorist organization. Here come the Suns (talk) 00:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

I am not talking about the category. I am talking about the label term in the project i.e terrorism. For the category, it a parent category. We dont put parent categories. Read WP:DIFFUSE. Category designated by Saudi Arabia, by UAE bluh bluh are already there.--SharabSalam (talk) 01:03, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

That is incorrect. [[Category:Organizations designated as terrorist in Asia]] is not a parent category of either [[Category:Organizations designated as terrorist by Saudi Arabia]] nor [[Category:Organizations designated as terrorist by the United Arab Emirates]]. Click on [[Category:Organizations designated as terrorist in Asia]] and see. Here come the Suns (talk) 01:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

prior accounts

Have you ever used another account on Wikipedia? nableezy - 21:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

No, as I explained here, I am not ModerateMikayla/Daryl.jensen . I wasn't even aware that they had previously removed the same content as I did until someone drew my attention to a previous discussion. I just happen to think they are correct. Here come the Suns (talk) 03:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Well I meant NoCal100, but sure, fine. Thanks, nableezy - 14:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Canvassing

[1] [2] [3] [4] form an open and shut violation of WP:CANVASS. Next time you will be reported. Zero^talk 06:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Stop blustering. I contacted every single person who was involved in that debate, with a neural message. Here come the Suns (talk) 15:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

You know what you did. Zero^talk 08:49, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Indeed - I notified every single editor who participated in the previous discussion about this topic, to make sure it is appropriate notification. Read WP:CANVASS, as you seem unfamiliar with what it says. Under "Appropriate notification" it says you may notify "Editors who have participated in previous discussions on the same topic (or closely related topics)", and do so with a message that is "polite, neutrally worded with a neutral title, clear in presentation" - which is exactly what I did.

And you know this of course, otherwise, instead of blustering here, you'd be reporting. Here come the Suns (talk) 15:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

1RR violation

This is a second revert in less than 24 hours. It is also not in the source. This is your opportunity to self-revert. Zero^talk 08:49, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

It is not a revert, but the addition of new information,. Read the definitions if you are unclear about it. Here come the Suns (talk) 15:09, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Icewhiz

I think you missed the fact that he's blocked. He won't be back, at least not with that account. Doug Weller talk 11:17, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

And יניב הורון is a blocked sock so shouldn't even have been editing. Doug Weller talk 11:19, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

And Avaya1, also a blocked sock. Looks like 3 for 3. Doug Weller talk 11:21, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Tulsi Gabbard

FWIW: Both of you (SharabSalam & Here Comes the Sun) are in violation of both of the special DS on Tulsi Gabbard's BLP. (1RR + "enforced BRD") Please consider discussing on the talk page if you think it is important, and please try to avoid getting yourselves in trouble with the wikipolice. Best, 🌿 SashiRolls ^{t · c} 16:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

apologies, I wasn't aware of these restrictions. Here come the Suns (talk) 16:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Use of chemical weapons in the Syrian Civil War

Please read this notification carefully; it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--SharabSalam (talk) 18:42, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 1

Hi Suns,

You and Huldra appear to have some history (the details of which I am not aware and into which I do not want to wade) but I ask you to please keep your comments on topic. The discussions do not need commentary about other redirects (e.g., here) or about editors (e.g., here). If you believe another editor has done something actionable, you can report it at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; otherwise, focus your comments on the content. I am looking at Shit Happens in Gaza right now, and will likely either nominate it or speedily delete it.

To clarify, this is not intended as a caution or warning (nothing at the RfD rises to that level, in my opinion), just friendly and sincere advice. I just see there's some tension and don't want it to turn into something bigger.

Cheers, -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 04:38, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate the advice. I'd rather you not nominate that link for deletion. Here come the Suns (talk) 04:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Why? I already did before I saw your comment, but I could withdraw the nomination. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 04:54, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

That's ok, you don't need to undo it. I thought it would be useful for other editors to see what kind of editor we're dealing with here, but I can always refer back to the redirect deletion discussion. Here come the Suns (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:55, 2 December 2019‎ (UTC)

You can, but again I urge you not to focus on that. If you believe there is something actionable to report, do so at WP:AN/I or another appropriate venue; otherwise, it's best to let it be. Happy editing, -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 05:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Sage advice, no doubt. Thank you. Here come the Suns (talk) 05:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

1RR

You have added the same material twice under 24 hours on Khalida Jarrar: please undo. (This, besides he fact that it is completely WP:UNDUE: not even the Israeli military spokespeople have claimed that she was involved with the [Dolev]] killing), regards, Huldra (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

I'll do this tomorrow, then. You are not here to build an encyclopedia but to push a POV and play games. Here come the Suns (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)