User talk:Kenatipo

Sandboxes

PRCs

My username

My username is from the Old Elbonian and means provocateur or "bomb-thrower". --Kenatipo ^speak! 21:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Wah-ching

Colors Top Secret

Time-lapse video of 9-12-2009 Taxpayer March on Washington

A time-lapse video of the march has been posted on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sjvc6baor8

James V. Schall

No problem. I agree wholeheartedly with your comment re automatic creation of a ref section!VirtualDave 01:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Shelly Shannon

I don't know a whole lot about the case and I only glanced at the page but I didn't see anything on it that indicated that she was religiously motivated. Doesn't anything spring to mind for you? - Schrandit (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

I see that she has had some interaction with that group during her incarceration but did she have any before? Is there any indication that she was motivated by religion when she pulled the trigger?

I guess that's the next question - when did she write that? - Schrandit (talk) 17:19, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Good advice from Kelly

• Don't get upset about the block. Take the night off, watch a movie or something, then come back and continue with constructive work. Just be sure that when you revert someone (especially on a high-profile controversial subject like Tea Party movement), and it's not obviously vandalism, you initiate a discussion on the talk page. I think any reasonable editor would have agreed those links were not spam. Don't lose your cool. With respect - Kelly ^hi! 01:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

I hadn't been aware of the report on you, although I did post the warning above. As you had stopped editing after the warning, I hadn't seen a need to report. I am glad it was a short block, which should have minimal impact on your editing.

On the links and tags, I'll post to the article talk page in a few minutes explaining my reasoning for reverting your edit (a post I should have made immediately after reverting). I hope you and the others involved join me in the discussion. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:19, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Enoch

Good show on that, I always figured our peripheral sources had been telling the truth but a primary source had been elusive. Thanks for digging that up. - Haymaker (talk) 16:52, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Randy Loughner

Good eye! KimChee (talk) 16:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Re. Jared Lee Loughner, atheism and WP:BLPCAT

I think you are probably right about WP:BLPCAT not applying to the article itself, though I think in a situation like that the sourcing needs to be made explicit - the article seems to do this now. Thanks for your input. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:25, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Garry Wills opinion

Hello, You've done an outstanding job summarizing what Wills wrote, and I have no problem with it. I am even more impressed since I know you are not fond of Wills. By the way, I think it was a very good speech, and of historical significance, but not of the caliber of Gettysburg. That's a pretty high bar, though, isn't it? Thanks again. Cullen328 (talk) 15:31, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Sandbox (cpc rewrite, Haymaker)

I had actually seen that in my musings, it is well written and I plan on introducing most of it when I have more time and the flame war on that page has died down a bit. I have been through this sort of ANI drama before, everything will end up where it should end up for the rest of the folks involved sooner or later, all you have to do is wait. The old adage to keep a cool head has saved my neck at least twice in these sorts of things. - Haymaker (talk) 21:31, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Age and stuff

Haha, I'm 19 - I haven't updated the userbox for years (I started editing when I was 15). Thanks for reminding me! Cheers, m.o.p 01:49, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Officers of the Tower of London

The Constable came first in rank; the Lieutenant was his deputy. Balfour was Lieutenant; but for much of his tenure, there was no Constable and he had the chief command. (The Constableship was in commission during the reign of James I, and the first Constable appointed by Charles I, in 1640, was soon withdrawn owing to Parliamentary opposition.) See W. L. Rutton's list of constables and lieutenants in "Notes and Queries" of 1908 and subsequent correspondence, which can be found in Google Books. Choess (talk) 07:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome! If you're interested in the duties of the office, I think George Younghusband's "The Tower from Within," also on Google Books, may have some material on the function of Constables, Lieutenants, and other officers of the Tower. Choess (talk) 01:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

New article

Hi Kenatipo, I created a new article, Joseph Maraachli case, I thought you might be interested in. Feel free to get involved. Thanks! NYyankees51 (talk) 00:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Please accept this invite to join the Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism. Simply click here to accept! Lionel (talk) 10:55, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

RFA support

Thanks for that.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Your question re: Masonry and Catholicism

Took a stab at answering your question from Masonry's perspective. see my talk page. Blueboar (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Re: Medugorje & Canon Law

YOU HAVE A NEW MESSAGE AT USER TALK: CANON LAW JUNKIE

be clearer

RE: and which username do you suspect that is? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 00:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

What, and be accused of "outing" him again? But, I will give you one oblique hint: mathsci. Kenatipo ^speak! 00:50, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Well, it's not "outing" to name a suspected sock. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 00:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

It's not a matter of sockpuppetry. The user, in consultation with admins, is being allowed to "retire" the name Wikimanone and edit under a different username. Something about "CLEANSTART", which I know nothing about. Kenatipo ^speak! 01:20, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Editors generally should be discouraged from changing usernames. In the case of a disruptive editor like Wikimanone, his checkered past, especially his block log, should follow him wherever he goes. If it doesn't follow him, the next admin to block him (it's only a matter of time) won't know his history, and won't mete out an appropriate "remedy", and the disruption and drama will continue. Kenatipo ^speak! 02:18, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Can I play? How many guesses do I get? Lionel (talk) 12:42, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

One. Kenatipo ^speak! 12:54, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

OK. Lemme see... How many letters? Sounds like...? (kidding) Lionel (talk) 22:52, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Kenatipo, have you seen this [1]? Looks like fun. If you have time to spare you may want to check it out. Lionel (talk) 00:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

I nominate "Any conservatism-related article that wMo/bW has worked on first"! (You sure aren't very selective about who can join that project. But like the man said, it's only a matter of time). Kenatipo ^speak! 01:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WikiManOne for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Jasper Deng (talk) 02:42, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Threats of violence

If you make another threat of violence as you did on my talk page you will be blocked. However, I redact the SPI.Jasper Deng (talk) 02:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Please do not make personal attacks on others, as you did on my talk page.Jasper Deng (talk) 18:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Is this what you're describing as "a personal attack"?

BW, it shouldn't surprise you that people have to follow you around undoing your POV edits. The edit you're complaining about is a good edit -- we don't need Cottrell's full biography following his name, he's already wikilinked to his own article. Kenatipo ^speak! 15:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

If so, (and combined with your over-reaction to my collegial desire to knuckle your head in a purely friendly way), I'm wondering if you may not be a little too thin-skinned for this game. If you're going to be an admin some day, you need to start growing a thick skin, NOW! --Kenatipo ^speak! 18:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)