User talk:Neetandtidy: Difference between revisions
welcome |
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Notice of Troubles remedies: new section |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
You are familar with here but just a little welcome note anyhow. Think of it as a welcome back. [[User:Murry1975|Murry1975]] ([[User talk:Murry1975|talk]]) 14:51, 28 March 2012 (UTC) |
You are familar with here but just a little welcome note anyhow. Think of it as a welcome back. [[User:Murry1975|Murry1975]] ([[User talk:Murry1975|talk]]) 14:51, 28 March 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Notice of Troubles remedies == |
|||
{| class="messagebox" style="width: 100%; background: ivory;" |
|||
| [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] |
|||
| |
|||
| The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to [[The Troubles]]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], any expected [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standards of behavior]], or any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles#Final decision]] section of the decision page. |
|||
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]], with the appropriate sections of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures]], and with the case decision page.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> |
|||
|} The high level of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=484427685 your interest] in extremely disputed matters leads me to notify you officially of the [[WP:TROUBLES]] Arbcom case. If you have any questions about how you might avoid difficulties in the future please let me know. For some inexplicable reason, when a brand-new editor (created 28 March 2012) comes bursting out of the gate into the middle of a fight, we admins tend to take notice. Thanks, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 21:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:01, 28 March 2012
Welcome!
Hi Neetandtidy! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Murry1975 (talk) 14:51, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
You are familar with here but just a little welcome note anyhow. Think of it as a welcome back. Murry1975 (talk) 14:51, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Notice of Troubles remedies
|
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to The Troubles. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles#Final decision section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page. |
The high level of your interest in extremely disputed matters leads me to notify you officially of the WP:TROUBLES Arbcom case. If you have any questions about how you might avoid difficulties in the future please let me know. For some inexplicable reason, when a brand-new editor (created 28 March 2012) comes bursting out of the gate into the middle of a fight, we admins tend to take notice. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 21:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC)