User talk:Tulkolahten: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:01, 30 March 2008

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you.

Click here to add a new message

Read Signpost Archive

Archives
No.1. No.2. No.3. No.4. No.5. No.6. No.7. No.8. No.9. No.10. No.11. No.12.

Re

Nemam poneti. Viditelne jsou vsichni unaveni temi nekonecnymi putkami. - Darwinek (talk) 21:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Corps (Czechoslovakia)

Sorry its such a small article, but its a start ;o)--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 13:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye

Unfortunately I've decided to retire for indefinite. Please don't write anything on my page now. I may only wish you the best of the luck. MarkBA ^{what's up?/my mess} 20:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AE

FYI, I am starting to look into the AE complaint. I haven't gotten very far into it yet, but just to start with, I would like to advise you to stop using the word "vandalism" in referring to other editors' contributions, unless you are dealing with real vandalism. "Real" vandalism is things like blanking a page and replacing it with a picture of someone's genitals; or changing a birth year to something in a different century, or wiping out a paragraph and replacing it with "HA HA U R DUMB." That's vandalism. :) Simply disagreeing about content though, is not vandalism. And calling it vandalism can actually escalate a dispute. So I recommend that you stop this practice right away.

Stay tuned for more as I dig deeper into it... --El on ka 06:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Also, as I look through this, it does appear that whatever Matthead was doing on March 23, that you were just following along behind him reverting all the way, but you never actually stopped to talk to him about it. I see no message from you to his talkpage, or any other talkpages about it. Or am I missing something? --El on ka 08:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I saw that, but that was days before you started reverting him. --El on ka 09:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 Unfortunately I've decided to retire for indefinite. Please don't write anything on my page now. I may only wish you the best of the luck. [[User:MarkBA|MarkBA]] <sup>[[User talk:MarkBA|what's up?]]/[[Special:Contributions/MarkBA|my mess]]</sup> 20:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
+==AE==
+FYI, I am starting to look into the AE complaint.  I haven't gotten very far into it yet, but just to start with, I would like to advise  you to stop using the word "vandalism" in referring to other editors' contributions, unless you are dealing with real vandalism.  "Real" vandalism is things like blanking a page and replacing it with a picture of someone's genitals; or changing a birth year to something in a different century, or wiping out a paragraph and replacing it with "HA HA U R DUMB."  That's vandalism.  :)  Simply disagreeing about content though, is not vandalism.  And ''calling'' it vandalism can actually escalate a dispute.  So I recommend that you stop this practice right away.
+Stay tuned for more as I dig deeper into it... --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 06:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
+: Thanks.  Also, as I look through this, it does appear that whatever Matthead was doing on March 23, that you were just following along behind him reverting all the way, but you never actually stopped to talk to him about it.  I see no message from you to his talkpage, or any other talkpages about it.  Or am I missing something? --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 08:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
+:: Yes, I saw that, but that was days before you started reverting him. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 09:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)