User talk:Zereshk

Archive 1.
Archive 2.
Archive 3.
Archive 4.

---

Doroud

Hi dude ! I was just passing by (....) Well if everything goes as planed, Sassanid Empire will be a featured article. The first Iranian article. I'm diligently working on it and it has just received the good article banner (man its damn tough !). Could you please check and review the article, in other words Peer review it ? and also image tags, could you check those too ? 9:27 23 February 2006 (UTC)

See what the Anti-Iranians are Doing?

They are not trying to change the definition of Iranian peoples iinto just a alnguage to work around what is happening in the Kurdish articles, becuase they know reality is going to hit them and Kurds will soon be defined as an Iranian people. They no work to undermine the definition of Iranian people into just a lingustic group with no cultural or historic or ethncial relationship those making seperation between Iranians easier.

About Gilaki

An open letter written by Gilaki students and university profs. about their mother tongue, in which they clearly call it Zaban-e Gilaki(Gilaki language), not dialect (Gooyesh). [1] Take a look at this on-line dictionary [2]. Also from a technical point of view: Unlike Persian, most possessives and adjectives precede the head noun, similar to English.Encyclopaedia Iranica Heja Helweda 05:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Azeris and Indo-Scythians

-Zereshk, this is Afghan Historian, you probably remember me. I'm working on a new page dealing with Azeri's and I would like to know if you have done any work regarding them. I would appreciate your help. Specifically I would like to know whether you would classify them as Turkic or Iranian. Several people claim them to be a Persian people that have been Turkified and others claim vice versa. Also, I was wondering if you knew anything about the Scythians and their invasion of the area now known as Pakistan and India and of the groups descended from them. On the Rajput page, I try bringing to light the Scythian ancestry of these groups but many other users instead revert to discussion about the mythological origins of these groups. You seem to have a good knowledge of Iranian studies from what read of your comments on the Freddie Mercury discussion (hope no hard feelings there). -User: Afghan Historian

Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive

Please vote in favour of improvement of History of Iran in Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive. It requires a massive amount of work. Amir85 11:44, February 24, 2006 (UTC)

Hi, alaraqme inke hichkodoom az editorha hanooz natoonestand hiiich madrake qane konandei erAe bedan ama man baz ham hazer shodeam be harfayshan goosh bedam bebinam chi migan. Yek safhaye bahs barangiz w nashenakhte, bedon manba, wa qeyre qabel eslah.Diyako Talk + 23:31, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

اولا همین بدبینی و پیش قضاوت های نادرست شماهاست که‌ عامل اصلی این همه‌ بحرانها و وقت کشی ها میشود. دوما طبق قوانین ویکیپدیا این شمایید که‌ باید ثابت کنید همچنین چیزی با همچین معنی وجود دارد نه‌ من معنی دقیق آن را همه‌ شما ها بهتر از من میدانید. حتی با اولین سرچ ها در گوگل میتوان چندین منبع برای معنی دقیق ان به‌ دست اورد که‌ به‌ معنی مردمانی است که‌ در ایران زندگی میکنند. معنی ادعا شده‌ در مقاله‌ غیر حقیقی و نتیجه‌ استنباط و نتیجه‌ گیریهای شخصی است که‌ هیچ انسان نوترالی نمیتواند آن را قبول کند Diyako Talk + 23:56, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Iranian peoples

Hello Zereshk. I've already noticed the discussion regarding the word "Aryan". As you might know, I am currently busy with removing POV from Safavids. I'll focus on Iranian peoples when I've more time.

Btw, the expression "Iranian peoples" and "Aryans" is also used by the The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies.

And here is another interesting article: "THE ORIGIN OF THE PRE-IMPERIAL IRANIAN PEOPLES" by Dr. Oric Basirov

Tajik 00:29, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

---

I have written a little bit, I mean when it comes to 'Iranian people', it brings up the whole Pan-Iranism in my opinion, perhaps we should put it up for votes? I am sure one or two Kurds will not win this over. This video is quite funny by the way: http://www.pan-iranism.com/test6.swf - If there is anything else I can do let me know. I didn't take that picture, I was told it was done in Tehran, but that guy also visited Kish in his visit to Iran too, so it could have been there too --Kash 01:27, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

That tag is only a suggestion. Do not revert it please. Diyako Talk + 01:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 82.194.62.22. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.

Iranian Kurdistan

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Iranian Kurdistan. I understand your fustration with the edit conflict on Iranian peoples: Diyako should absolutely not have re-applied the tag after you had removed it. But responding in a similar fashion violates WP:POINT. I know it's hard to keep calm when someone else is behaving unreasonably, but one can sure try! Thank you. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 02:04, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

I don't like your personal attacks

This is the third time. This time you called me an ethnically driven bigot [3]. What are you so enraged about? Please calm down.Heja Helweda 02:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Stop attacking Persia and Iran.--Zereshk 04:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

I don't like personal attacks

This is the fourth time Edit summary of Iranian Kurdistan (where you said I know you hate Persians. Take your hatred elsewhere). We just have a technical disagreement, which can be worked out by compromise. Heja Helweda 04:10, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Stop attacking Persia and Iranians.--Zereshk 04:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Re: Iranian peoples pic

Ok, I can't think of who to add right now, but I'll try to do it sometime. Ah, I see you've met the Kurdish editors. I've had some disputes with them awhile back, mainly over adding the fact that the Kurds are an Iranian people, which all of them deny. Oh, I was wondering, were the Safavids of Azeri origin? I've had a very long revert war with User:Tajik over this. Thanks. --Khoikhoi 06:19, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for you reply. I'd appreciate it that next time Tajik reverts (and when he's cooled down) that you edit the page - perhaps he'll listen to you.

Interesting theory. What do you think about the current president of Iran? He's a bit of extreme on issues, don't you think? And about Heja and Diyako trying to break up the ethnic groups of Iran, I recall watching the BBC once, and they were interviewing the son of the Shah, who lives somewhere outside of Los Angeles. He was saying, "It's not about the past, it's not about me, it's not about monarchy - it's about the right of the Iranian people to choose freely they want for themselves. What I want people to understand is that it's a race against time. Will Iran become a democracy first or will this regime have it's bomb?" [4] And I was thinking, this is exactly what the US government wants him to say! But what they really want to do is have the old regime once again.

About the poetry, does it have to be at the very top of the page? Just wondering.

I originally thought that you were an admin but I guess you aren't. Are there any Iranian admins? --Khoikhoi 07:16, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Ibn Sina

Someone in the Ibn Sina page is deleting the word Persian everyday and I have to put it back on. I gave him three sources that Ibn Sina was identified as Iranian or Persian (including Britannica) and he still edits it. Is there anyway I can stop him? In my opinion he is breaking the rules since I have sources and he does not. I would appreciate your help.

He is also saying that Uzbekistan and Afghanistan were not parts of Persia at the time of his birth but instead parts of the Islamic Caliphate

Is this true? Of course this does not make Ibn Sina any less Persian/Iranian but I just wanted to make sure.

Thanks

Gol 17:39, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Temptation

As much as I love our Kurdish brothers, they seem to be hassling us too much. It looks like their articles e.g. Kurdish culture, Kurdish dance, Kurdish clothing, etc are not up to wiki standards and not always referenced. Shouldn't they be focusing on them instead?! if they are such proud nationalists. --Kash 21:24, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Iranian Watchdog

Aucaman and a few others like Heja Helweda and Diyako have been repeatedly and systematically vandalizing the Iran-related topics such as Persian people and Iranian peoples, propagating false information, maliciously editing/disputing/deleting without one shred of proof to backup their wild claims, applying the strawman falsification approach, trying to establish new 'facts" based on their own personal assumptions and beliefs.

In order to prevent this situation, we need to create an Iranian Watchdog on Wikipedia and guard the integrity and quality of all the Wikipedia articles that are related to Iran and Iranians. Please let me know if you think that's a good idea. --ManiF 13:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

i am kicking the ass of this idiot salafi zora can u help me in kicking her ass please --82.194.62.22 17:26, 27 February 2006 (UTC)