User talk:Секретное общество: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m DELETED old/resolved topic
→‎April 2024: new section
Line 5: Line 5:
:I'm confused as to what I did wrong, as the only external link I provided was to Social Blade, of which is a perfectly reasonable source the last time I checked. I did add INTERNAL links that were relevant to the given sentence, as the subject worked in said companies. If that is FLOWERY, then it's a simple mistake.
:I'm confused as to what I did wrong, as the only external link I provided was to Social Blade, of which is a perfectly reasonable source the last time I checked. I did add INTERNAL links that were relevant to the given sentence, as the subject worked in said companies. If that is FLOWERY, then it's a simple mistake.
:I feel that threatening a blockage/ban for something of this sort is flirting with [[WP:ADMINABUSE]], especially when there was nothing even close to advertising or promotion, but rather aforementioned structure to a sentence. [[User:Секретное общество|Секретное общество]] ([[User talk:Секретное общество#top|talk]]) 06:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
:I feel that threatening a blockage/ban for something of this sort is flirting with [[WP:ADMINABUSE]], especially when there was nothing even close to advertising or promotion, but rather aforementioned structure to a sentence. [[User:Секретное общество|Секретное общество]] ([[User talk:Секретное общество#top|talk]]) 06:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

== April 2024 ==

Hi. I have reverted your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Di_Paolo&diff=prev&oldid=1175236651 edit] on [[Nick Di Paolo]] in which you removed a reliable source for age and added an unsourced birthdate. Please refer to [[WP:DOB]] and refrain from doing this in the future. Thanks! [[User:Rift|Rift]] ([[User talk:Rift|talk]]) 03:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:05, 17 April 2024

March 2024

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Dutch Mantel, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Drmies (talk) 04:38, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused as to what I did wrong, as the only external link I provided was to Social Blade, of which is a perfectly reasonable source the last time I checked. I did add INTERNAL links that were relevant to the given sentence, as the subject worked in said companies. If that is FLOWERY, then it's a simple mistake.
I feel that threatening a blockage/ban for something of this sort is flirting with WP:ADMINABUSE, especially when there was nothing even close to advertising or promotion, but rather aforementioned structure to a sentence. Секретное общество (talk) 06:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hi. I have reverted your edit on Nick Di Paolo in which you removed a reliable source for age and added an unsourced birthdate. Please refer to WP:DOB and refrain from doing this in the future. Thanks! Rift (talk) 03:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]