User talk:86.6.111.196

Welcome!

Hello, 86.6.111.196, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest
• FAQ for Organizations

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! LuckyLouie (talk) 15:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your question

You need to read the encyclopedia's policies in the section above this one. We include only material cited from reliable sources and do not include an editor's personal opinions in the body of the article. Thanks. LuckyLouie (talk) 16:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Enfield Poltergeist, you may be blocked from editing. LuckyLouie (talk) 17:22, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Enfield Poltergeist. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ruby Murray 13:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for Abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Through a recent sequence of comments on my talk page, it has become clear that you are the same editor at User:Judgejoker. Using multiple accounts to participate in an edit war at Enfield Poltergeist violates WP:SOCK. This article was the subject of a recent complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 20:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

86.6.111.196 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked due to the fact that im living in a house with 6 students and 4 are studying Parapsychology, so the comments attributed to me are in fact not me. Reason number two is that Wikipedia is based upon fact not POV. The user which has complained about me is not willing to come to a civil and friendly consensus. The complaining user just undid my changes. I would really like the chance to (In a friendly way discuss this in a sensible fashion. Thank you to who ever is adjudicating

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I would like to be unblocked due to the fact that im living in a house with 6 students and 4 are studying Parapsychology, so the comments attributed to me are in fact not me. Reason number two is that Wikipedia is based upon fact not POV. The user which has complained about me is not willing to come to a civil and friendly consensus. The complaining user just undid my changes. I would really like the chance to (In a friendly way discuss this in a sensible fashion. Thank you to who ever is adjudicating |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to be unblocked due to the fact that im living in a house with 6 students and 4 are studying Parapsychology, so the comments attributed to me are in fact not me. Reason number two is that Wikipedia is based upon fact not POV. The user which has complained about me is not willing to come to a civil and friendly consensus. The complaining user just undid my changes. I would really like the chance to (In a friendly way discuss this in a sensible fashion. Thank you to who ever is adjudicating |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to be unblocked due to the fact that im living in a house with 6 students and 4 are studying Parapsychology, so the comments attributed to me are in fact not me. Reason number two is that Wikipedia is based upon fact not POV. The user which has complained about me is not willing to come to a civil and friendly consensus. The complaining user just undid my changes. I would really like the chance to (In a friendly way discuss this in a sensible fashion. Thank you to who ever is adjudicating |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

.--Judgejoker 21:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)