Enfield poltergeist

Coordinates: 51°39′18″N 0°02′06″W / 51.655°N 0.035°W / 51.655; -0.035
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Enfield Poltergeist)

284 Green Street, claimed home of the Enfield poltergeist

The Enfield poltergeist was a claim of supernatural activity at 284 Green Street, a council house in Brimsdown, Enfield, London, England, United Kingdom, between 1977 and 1979. The alleged poltergeist activity centred around sisters Janet (11) and Margaret Hodgson (13).[1]

Some members of the Society for Psychical Research (SPR), such as inventor Maurice Grosse and writer Guy Lyon Playfair, believed the haunting to be genuine, while others such as Anita Gregory and John Beloff were "unconvinced" and found evidence the girls had faked incidents for the benefit of journalists. Members of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), including stage magicians such as Milbourne Christopher and Joe Nickell, criticized paranormal investigators for being credulous whilst also identifying elements of the case as being indicative of a hoax.[2][3][4]

The story attracted press coverage in British newspapers, has been mentioned in books, featured in television and radio[5] documentaries, and dramatized in the 2016 horror film The Conjuring 2.


In August 1977, single parent Peggy Hodgson called the Metropolitan Police to her rented home at 284 Green Street in Enfield, London, claiming she had witnessed furniture moving and that two of her four children had heard knocking sounds on the walls. The children included Janet, aged 11, and Margaret, aged 13. A woman police constable reported witnessing a chair "wobble and slide" but "could not determine the cause of the movement."[3] Later claims included disembodied voices, loud noises, thrown toys, overturned chairs, and children levitating.[1]

Over a period of eighteen months, more than thirty people, including the Hodgsons' neighbours, paranormal investigators and journalists, said they variously saw heavy furniture moving of its own accord, objects being thrown across a room and the sisters seeming to levitate several feet off the ground. Many also heard and recorded knocking noises and a gruff voice.[6] The story was regularly covered in the Daily Mirror newspaper until reports came to an end in 1979.[3][7]



Society for Psychical Research (SPR) members Maurice Grosse and Guy Lyon Playfair reported "curious whistling and barking noises coming from Janet's general direction." Although Playfair maintained the paranormal activity was genuine and wrote in his later book This House Is Haunted: The True Story of a Poltergeist (1980) that an "entity" was to blame for the Enfield disturbances, he often doubted the children's veracity and wondered if they were playing tricks and exaggerating. Still, Grosse and Playfair believed that even though some of the alleged poltergeist activity was faked by the girls, other incidents were genuine.[3][7][8] Other paranormal investigators who studied the case included American demonologists Ed and Lorraine Warren, who visited the Enfield house in 1978 and were convinced that the events had a supernatural explanation.[3]

Janet was detected in trickery; a video camera in an adjoining room caught her bending spoons and attempting to bend an iron bar.[9][10] Grosse had observed Janet banging a broom handle on the ceiling and hiding his tape-recorder.[11] According to Playfair, one of Janet's voices, who she called "Bill", displayed a "habit of suddenly changing the topic—it was a habit Janet also had".[4] When Janet and Margaret admitted "pranking" to journalists, Grosse and Playfair compelled the girls to retract their confessions.[3] The two men were mocked by other researchers for being easily duped.[12]

Psychical researcher Renée Haynes noted that doubts were raised about the alleged poltergeist voice at the SPR conference at Cambridge in 1978, where videocassettes from Enfield were examined.[13] SPR investigator Anita Gregory stated the Enfield case had been "overrated", characterising several episodes of the girls' behaviour as "suspicious" and speculated that the girls had "staged" some incidents for the benefit of journalists seeking a sensational story.[3][7] John Beloff, a former president of the SPR, investigated and suggested Janet was practicing ventriloquism. Both Beloff and Gregory came to the conclusion that Janet and Margaret were playing tricks on the investigators.[14]


Milbourne Christopher, an American stage magician, briefly investigated the Enfield occurrences and failed to observe anything that could be called paranormal. He was dismayed by what he felt was suspicious activity on the part of Janet, later concluding that "the poltergeist was nothing more than the antics of a little girl who wanted to cause trouble and who was very, very clever."[3] Ventriloquist Ray Alan visited the house and concluded that Janet's male voices were simply vocal tricks.[3]

Skeptical interpretations[edit]

Criticisms of investigations[edit]

Skeptic Joe Nickell of the US-based Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP) examined the findings of paranormal investigators and criticized them for being overly credulous; when a supposedly disembodied demonic voice was heard, Playfair noted that "as always Janet's lips hardly seemed to be moving." He states that a remote-controlled still camera—the photographer was not present in the room with the girls—timed to take a picture every fifteen seconds was shown by investigator Melvin Harris to reveal "pranking" by the girls. He argues that a photo allegedly depicting Janet levitating actually shows her bouncing off the bed as if it were a trampoline. Harris called the photos examples of common "gymnastics" and said, "It's worth remembering that Janet was a school sports champion!"

Nickell pointed out that a tape-recorder malfunction that Grosse attributed to supernatural activity and which SPR president David Fontana described as an occurrence "which appeared to defy the laws of mechanics" was a peculiar threading jam occurring with older model reel to reel tape-recorders.[15] He also said that Ed Warren was "notorious for exaggerating and even making up incidents in such cases, often transforming a 'haunting' case into one of 'demonic possession.'"[3]

In 2015, Deborah Hyde commented that there was no solid evidence for the Enfield poltergeist: "The first thing to note is that the occurrences didn't happen under controlled circumstances. People frequently see what they expect to see, their senses being organised and shaped by their prior experiences and beliefs."[4]

Response to claims[edit]

Skeptics have argued that the alleged poltergeist voice that originated from Janet was produced by false vocal cords above the larynx and had the phraseology and vocabulary of a child.[11] In a television interview for BBC Scotland, Janet was observed to gain attention by waving her hand, and then putting her hand in front of her mouth while a claimed "disembodied" voice was heard. During the interview both girls were asked the question, "How does it feel to be haunted by a poltergeist?" Janet replied, "It's not haunted," and Margaret, in a hushed tone, interrupted, "Shut up". These factors have been regarded by skeptics as evidence against the case.[11]

As a "magician experienced in the dynamics of trickery", Nickell examined Playfair's account as well as contemporary press clippings. He noted that the supposed poltergeist "tended to act only when it was not being watched" and concluded that the incidents were best explained as children's pranks.[3]

Although Grosse made tape-recordings of Janet and believed no trickery was involved, the magician Bob Couttie said, "He made some of the recordings available to me and, having listened to them very carefully, I came to the conclusion that there was nothing in what I had heard that was beyond the capabilities of an imaginative teenager."[11] All of the recordings have been catalogued and digitalised by the SPR, and a book of their content, The Enfield Poltergeist Tapes: White Crow, was produced by Dr Melvyn Willin in 2019.

A 2016 article by psychology professor Chris French in Time Out magazine described five reasons why he believed the case to have been a hoax.[16] His reasons are:

  • The two sisters involved admitting hoaxing some of the activity
  • The photo of Janet levitating above her bed could just as easily be explained as Janet jumping
  • The "spirit" of an old man who supposedly possessed Janet took a great deal of interest in menstruation
  • Eyewitnesses are notoriously unreliable
  • Other schoolgirl pranks before and after have gotten out of hand

In popular culture[edit]


  1. ^ a b Storr, Will. (2015). "The Real Story of the Enfield Haunting". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 3 May 2015.
  2. ^ Couttie, Bob. (1988). Forbidden Knowledge: The Paranormal Paradox. Lutterworth Press. p. 62. ISBN 978-0-7188-2686-4 "The case remains very controversial. Grosse, Playfair, Hasted and others believe it was genuine, Anita Gregory and other members of the SPR were unconvinced. Magicians and ventriloquists came to the conclusion that Janet was cheating."
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Nickell, Joe (July 2012). "Enfield Poltergeist". CSI. Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. Retrieved 14 April 2018.
  4. ^ a b c Hyde, Deborah. The Enfield 'Poltergeist': A Sceptic Speaks. The Guardian. 1 May 2015. Retrieved 2 May 2015.
  5. ^ a b "The Reunion - The Enfield Poltergeist (Original TX on BBC R4 on 26/12/1978) - BBC Sounds". www.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 15 July 2022.
  6. ^ "The Reunion, The Enfield Poltergeist". BBC Radio 4. British Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 13 April 2018.
  7. ^ a b c Joe Nickell (3 July 2012). The Science of Ghosts: Searching for Spirits of the Dead. Prometheus Books. pp. 281–. ISBN 978-1-61614-586-6.
  8. ^ Playfair, Guy Lyon (1980). This House Is Haunted: The True Story of a Poltergeist. Stein and Day. ISBN 978-0-7387-1867-5.
  9. ^ Guiley, Rosemary (1994). The Guinness Encyclopedia of Ghosts and Spirits. Guinness World Records Limited. p. 109. ISBN 978-0851127484
  10. ^ Clarkson, Michael. (2006). Poltergeists: Examining Mysteries of the Paranormal. Firefly Books. p. 135. ISBN 978-1554071593 "Anita Gregory, of the Society for Psychical Research, who had spent just a short time at the Hodgson home, said the mysterious men's voices were simply the result of Janet and Margaret putting bed sheets to their mouths. In addition, Gregory said that a video camera had caught Janet attempting to bend spoons and an iron bar by force and 'practicing' levitation by bouncing up and down on her bed."
  11. ^ a b c d Couttie, Bob. (1988). Forbidden Knowledge: The Paranormal Paradox. Lutterworth Press. pp. 62–64. ISBN 978-0-7188-2686-4
  12. ^ Carlson, H. G. (1994). Mysteries of the Unexplained. Contemporary Books. p. 46. ISBN 978-0809234974
  13. ^ Haynes, Renée. (1982). The Society for Psychical Research 1882–1982: A History. MacDonald & Co. p. 112. ISBN 978-0356078755
  14. ^ Clarkson, Michael. (2006). Poltergeists: Examining Mysteries of the Paranormal. Firefly Books. p. 131. ISBN 978-1554071593
  15. ^ Nickell, Joe (September 1995). "The Haunted Tape Recorder". CSI. Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. Retrieved 14 April 2018.
  16. ^ "Five reasons why London's most famous poltergeist case is a hoax". Chris French.
  17. ^ Jagodzinski, Jan (2004). Youth Fantasies: The Perverse Landscape of the Media. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 145. ISBN 978-1-4039-6164-8.
  18. ^ Hawkes, Rebecca (25 April 2016). "What did the Enfield Haunting have to do with Ed and Lorraine Warren?". The Telegraph. The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 4 September 2016.
  19. ^ Whistledown (8 April 2018). "The Enfield Poltergeist". The Reunion. BBC. BBC Radio 4. Retrieved 14 April 2018.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]

51°39′18″N 0°02′06″W / 51.655°N 0.035°W / 51.655; -0.035