User talk:89.216.115.159: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 05:40, 7 November 2017

This is 89.216.115.159's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oransi (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alpha Quadrant was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The content of this article is fairly well written, but unfortunately the references in this article haven't established why this company is particularly notable. This particular company has only been around for eight years, references provided only mention this company in passing, and a google search does not show any significant coverage in reliable third party sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oransi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 05:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 89.216.115.159, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 05:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 {{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in ''published'', [[WP:RS|''reliable'']], [[WP:SECONDARY|''secondary'']] sources that are ''[[Wikipedia:Identifying and using independent sources|independent]]'' of the subject—see the [[WP:CORP|guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies]],  [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]] and [[Help:Introduction to referencing/1]])</small>, so that the information is [[WP:V|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.|}}&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:
-{{divbox|blue|3=The content of this article is fairly well written, but unfortunately the references in this article haven't established why this company is particularly notable. This particular company has only been around for eight years, references provided only mention this company in passing, and a google search does not show any [[WP:GNG|significant coverage]] in [WP:RS}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.  You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
+{{divbox|blue|3=The content of this article is fairly well written, but unfortunately the references in this article haven't established why this company is particularly notable. This particular company has only been around for eight years, references provided only mention this company in passing, and a google search does not show any [[WP:GNG|significant coverage]] in [[WP:RS|reliable third party sources]].}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.  You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
 {{clear}}
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Oransi]] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.