User talk:Aeonx: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:Aeonx/Archive/2020/April. (BOT) |
Doug Weller (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
:: Oh here we go, the Mafia is back. Your threat is a disappointing, straight to a 3rr? Firstly I am not changing content. Read up on wiki policy and then read talk page you idiot. [[User:Aeonx|Aeonx]] ([[User talk:Aeonx#top|talk]]) 12:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC) |
:: Oh here we go, the Mafia is back. Your threat is a disappointing, straight to a 3rr? Firstly I am not changing content. Read up on wiki policy and then read talk page you idiot. [[User:Aeonx|Aeonx]] ([[User talk:Aeonx#top|talk]]) 12:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
== You've been warned before for personal attacks - calling people idiots & references to the mafia shows you haven't learned == |
|||
{{u|EdJohnston}} left you wise words at [[User talk:Aeonx/Archive/2015/December]]. Your failure to show [[WP:AGF|good faith}} above and at [[WP:RSN#Ad Fontes Media and AllSides]], the personal attack, all leave me wondering if you will ever change. Note that Discretionary sanctions apply to talk pages, not just articles. If you wish to continue editing in the area of American politics, you need to drop the stick. You can start by removing your comments above and at RSN. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 10:44, 15 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:44, 15 April 2020
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
| This is Aeonx's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
The Bugle: IssueICLXVI, February 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
March Madness 2020
G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team
The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 12:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXVIII, April 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
Your recent editing history at One America News Network shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. O3000 (talk) 12:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
You've been warned before for personal attacks - calling people idiots & references to the mafia shows you haven't learned
EdJohnston left you wise words at User talk:Aeonx/Archive/2015/December. Your failure to show [[WP:AGF|good faith}} above and at WP:RSN#Ad Fontes Media and AllSides, the personal attack, all leave me wondering if you will ever change. Note that Discretionary sanctions apply to talk pages, not just articles. If you wish to continue editing in the area of American politics, you need to drop the stick. You can start by removing your comments above and at RSN. Doug Weller talk 10:44, 15 April 2020 (UTC)