User talk:Al-Andalusi

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Pamela Geller shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jason from nyc (talk) 10:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Your addition to Motives for the September 11 attacks has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The content was removed by another user for reasons unrelated to copyright, but it was also a copyright violation, and has been revision deleted. — Diannaa (talk) 22:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

WP:ARBPIA notice

As I am sure you know all pages that are part of the Israeli-Arab conflict topic area are subject to a 1RR restriction. Yu have been repeateldy vialotign that restriction by edit warrign on artilces liek 1948 Palestinian exodus and Israeli disengagement from Gaza. You need to stop , or you will be blocked form editing. Epson Salts (talk) 02:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

• As far as I can tell the edit warring has stopped but, Al-Andalusi, it is true, you are clearly edit warring, and as an uninvolved administrator I will not hesitate to block you if you continue. Please do not let it get that far. Drmies (talk) 03:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

@Drmies:, I did not revert in 1948 Palestinian exodus. Besides, being an administrator, I find it strange that you had nothing to say about the blanket reverting going on and the dismissal of the concerns raised on the talk page. Al-Andalusi (talk) 03:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

• I was looking at Israeli disengagement from Gaza, where you reverted on 12 and 14 September. There is no reference in any edit summary to talk page discussion. I'm about to warn your counterpart. If there is hanky-panky going around in other articles, and you think it is in violation of ARBPIA, by all means report it. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 04:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

@Drmies:, I was referring to 1948 Palestinian exodus, where one user blanket reverted multiple unrelated edits that I made. Plus the removal of dubious tag by another user (Epson Salts), with no follow-up in the talk page section. Al-Andalusi (talk) 04:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Muslim National Associations into Musa Hadeib. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:42, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ibn al-Jawzi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ibn al-Jawzi (disambigutation)

Ibn al-Jawzi (disambiguation) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ibn al-Jawzi (disambigutation)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abu Nasr (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kunya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.